ABHISHEK TRIPATHI,JHINJHAK KANPUR DEHAT vs. ITO, WARD-1(3)(1), KANPUR, KANPUR
In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 489/LKW/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow27 Oct 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Year: 2017-18 Abhishek Tripathi V. The Ito Ward No.15, Shankarganj Ward 1(3)(1) Jhinjhak Kanpur Kanpur Dehat (U.P) Tan/Pan:Atjpt8479N (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Kamlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate Respondent By: Shri R.R.N. Shukla, D.R. O R D E R
For Appellant: Shri Kamlesh Kumar Pandey, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R.R.N. Shukla, D.R
Section 144Section 271BSection 44A
sections
270A and 271B of the Act, separately.
2.2
Aggrieved, the Assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. First Appellate Authority, who dismissed the appeal of the assessee for the reason of non-compliance by the Assessee.
ITA No.489/LKW/2025 Page 3 of 8
2.1
Now, the assessee has approached this Tribunal challenging the order of the Addl/JCIT(A)-1, Nashik