SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT JAIL,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY
In the result, for statistical purposes, both the appeals are treated as allowed
ITA 252/LKW/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow05 Feb 2020AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor
For Appellant: Shri Shailendra Misra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E
3. That the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals ) has erred in law and on facts in failing to observe that fees under section 234E has been wrongly included in the intimation u/s 200A by the A.O. though section
ITA No.252&253/LKW/2019 Page 2 of 4
234E of the I.T. Act, 1961, is mentioned in section 200A by Finance