BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

15 results for “TDS”+ Section 234E(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune665Chennai523Patna466Indore414Bangalore390Cochin373Delhi339Mumbai185Nagpur132Visakhapatnam82Hyderabad55Cuttack47Jaipur40Kolkata33Amritsar29Raipur28Jabalpur28Dehradun26Karnataka26Surat17Rajkot15Lucknow15Ahmedabad13Allahabad12Panaji11Agra10Jodhpur7Chandigarh6Guwahati6Ranchi4

Key Topics

Section 234E88Section 200A27TDS15Section 220(2)12Condonation of Delay10Deduction10Natural Justice10Section 1549Section 143(3)8Limitation/Time-bar

JAMUNA DEVI NARESH CHANDRA MAHAVIDYALAYA,JALAUN vs. ITO-TDS, KANPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 464/LKW/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow21 May 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, DR
Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

234E of Rs.14,600/-. Subsequently, it seems that the A.Y. 2013-14 Jamuna Devi Naresh Chandra Mahavidyalaya assessee also filed a correction statement but the TDS CPC, on processing of the said correction statement reiterated the late filing fee of Rs.14,600/- and also levied interest under section 220(2

SHIVANSH INFRAESTATE PVT. LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTERALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS, GHAZIABAD

7
Section 2504
Section 372

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 125/LKW/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 154Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned counsel

SHIVANSH INFRAESTATE PVT. LTD.,3RD. FLOOR, BLOCK-A , SURAJDEEP COMPLEX, JOPLING ROAD, LUCKNOW vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 121/LKW/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 154Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned counsel

SHIVANSH INFRAESTATE PVT. LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS, , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 122/LKW/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 154Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned counsel

SHIVANSH INFRAESTATE PVT.LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. CENTERALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS\, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 123/LKW/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 154Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned counsel

SHIVANSH INFRAESTATE PVT. LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS, , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 124/LKW/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 154Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned counsel

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TUBEWELL DIVISION,BARABANKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-II, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 104/LKW/2021[2015-2016(26 Q - Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 Nov 2022

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned counsel

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TUBEWELL DIVISION,BARABANKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-II, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 106/LKW/2021[2015-2016 (26 Q - Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 Nov 2022

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned counsel

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TUBEWELL DIVISION ,BARABANKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-II, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 107/LKW/2021[2015-2016 (26 Q - Q 4)]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 Nov 2022

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned counsel

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TUBEWELL DIVISION,BARABANKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-II, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 103/LKW/2021[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 Nov 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned counsel

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TUBEWELL DIVISION,BARABANKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-II, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 105/LKW/2021[2015-2016 (26 Q - Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 Nov 2022

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned counsel

SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT JAIL,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, for statistical purposes, both the appeals are treated as allowed

ITA 252/LKW/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow05 Feb 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Shailendra Misra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

234E of the I.T. Act, 1961, is mentioned in section 200A by Finance Act, 2015 with effect from 1st June 2015 . 2. The brief facts are that the assessee preferred appeals before the ld. CIT(A) against the orders, both dated 5/5/2016, passed by the ITO(TDS

SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT JAIL,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, for statistical purposes, both the appeals are treated as allowed

ITA 253/LKW/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow05 Feb 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Shailendra Misra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

234E of the I.T. Act, 1961, is mentioned in section 200A by Finance Act, 2015 with effect from 1st June 2015 . 2. The brief facts are that the assessee preferred appeals before the ld. CIT(A) against the orders, both dated 5/5/2016, passed by the ITO(TDS

AMAN INFRAPROPERTIES P. LTD,LUCKNOW vs. ACIT RANGE-1, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 386/LKW/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow16 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

For Appellant: Shri Shubham Rastogi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 234ESection 250Section 37

section 234E of 1. T. Act for F. Y. 2014-15 in Form 2402 was also filed on 16.10.2021 against Order dated 23.09.2021 of ACIT-TDS, CPC and Ld. C.I.T. (A) decided the issue of TDS in the Quantum Appeal and thereby closed the quantum appeal proceedings without deciding the quantum issue. WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ABOVE

AMAN INFRAPROPERTIES P. LTD,LUCKNOW vs. ACIT RANGE-1, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 387/LKW/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow16 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

For Appellant: Shri Shubham Rastogi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 234ESection 250Section 37

section 234E of 1. T. Act for F. Y. 2014-15 in Form 2402 was also filed on 16.10.2021 against Order dated 23.09.2021 of ACIT-TDS, CPC and Ld. C.I.T. (A) decided the issue of TDS in the Quantum Appeal and thereby closed the quantum appeal proceedings without deciding the quantum issue. WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ABOVE