M/S. LALA BHARAT LAL AND SONS,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed whereas the stay petitions are dismissed

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri. T.S. Kapoor

section 206C of the Act, as the same had not been generated from manufacture or mechanical working done by the assessee. It was submitted that the assessee had also relied on the order of the ITAT Ahmedabad ‘B’ Bench in the case of ‘Navine Fluorine International Ltd. vs. ACIT(TDS

M/S SINGHAL CONCAST PVT. LTD,LUCKNOW vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-1, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

section 206C came up for consideration of the ITAT Ahmedabad ‘B’ Bench in the case of ‘Navine Fluorine International Ltd. vs. ACIT(TDS

M/S. WIRE ONE,LUCKNOW vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)-I, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

section 206C came up for consideration of the ITAT Ahmedabad ‘B’ Bench in the case of ‘Navine Fluorine International Ltd. vs. ACIT(TDS

THE DISTRICT MINING OFFICER,BAREILLY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

section 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The grounds of appeal are as under:- “1. BECAUSE, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the impugned order passed by the Ld. CIT (A), sustaining the order of ITO (TDS

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee for Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2015-16 are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assessee is not a "person" for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee for Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2015-16 are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assessee is not a "person" for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee for Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2015-16 are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assessee is not a "person" for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee for Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2015-16 are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assessee is not a "person" for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee for Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2015-16 are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assessee is not a "person" for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee for Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2015-16 are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assessee is not a "person" for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DISTRICT MINING OFFICER,PILIBHIT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILY

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoor

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assesses is not a 'person' for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DISTRICT MINING OFFICER,PILIBHIT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILY

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoor

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assesses is not a 'person' for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DISTRICT MINING OFFICER,PILIBHIT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILY

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoor

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assesses is not a 'person' for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DISTRICT MINING OFFICER,PILIBHIT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILY

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoor

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assesses is not a 'person' for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DISTRICT MINING OFFICER,PILIBHIT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILY

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoor

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assesses is not a 'person' for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DISTRICT MINING OFFICER,PILIBHIT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILY

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoor

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assesses is not a 'person' for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DISTRICT MINING OFFICER,PILIBHIT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILY

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoor

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assesses is not a 'person' for the purpose of section