Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “TDS”+ Section 206Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore239 Pune236 Delhi184 Chennai155 Mumbai62 Raipur44 Kolkata41 Cochin28 Ahmedabad26 Karnataka26 Jodhpur20 Jaipur18 Nagpur16 Rajkot15 Indore14 Panaji10 Lucknow8 Dehradun8 Himachal Pradesh6 Amritsar4 Chandigarh4 Guwahati4 Visakhapatnam3 Hyderabad3 Cuttack2 Telangana2 Rajasthan1 SC1 Surat1 Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 206C64 TDS8 Natural Justice7 Limitation/Time-bar6 Section 206C(1)2

M/S SINGHAL CONCAST PVT. LTD,LUCKNOW vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-1, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 10/LKW/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow27 Apr 2022AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 206Section 206CSection 206C(1)Section 206C(6)

section 206C came up for consideration of the ITAT Ahmedabad ‘B’ Bench in the case of ‘Navine Fluorine International Ltd. vs. ACIT(TDS

THE DISTRICT MINING OFFICER,BAREILLY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 246/LKW/2018[2008-09]Status: Disposed

ITAT Lucknow

30 Jun 2025

AY 2008-09

Section 206CSection 250

section 206C\n(6A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The grounds of appeal are as under:-\n“1. BECAUSE, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the impugned\norder passed by the Ld. CIT (A), sustaining the order of ITO (TDS

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee for Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2015-16 are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 302/LKW/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow18 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Kumar Yadav, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigarm, D.R

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assessee is not a "person" for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee for Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2015-16 are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 303/LKW/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow18 Oct 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Kumar Yadav, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigarm, D.R

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assessee is not a "person" for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee for Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2015-16 are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 304/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow18 Oct 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Kumar Yadav, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigarm, D.R

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assessee is not a "person" for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee for Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2015-16 are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 305/LKW/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow18 Oct 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Kumar Yadav, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigarm, D.R

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assessee is not a "person" for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee for Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2015-16 are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 306/LKW/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow18 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Kumar Yadav, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigarm, D.R

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assessee is not a "person" for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee for Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2015-16 are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 307/LKW/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow18 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Kumar Yadav, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigarm, D.R

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assessee is not a "person" for the purpose of section