Search: TDS | BharatTax

7 results for “TDS”+ Section 206clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 206C20 Section 133(6)11 Section 206C(1)8 Section 206C(6)7 TDS6 Section 1923 Deduction2

SUB REGISTRAR, TAMKUHIRAJ,KUSHINAGAR vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (I&CI), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 347/LKW/2019[2013-14]Status: FixedITAT Lucknow05 Dec 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Videshri Anadee Nath Misshra**

Section 133(6)Section 192Section 2(31)Section 272Section 272(2)(C)Section 272A(2)(C)

TDS from salaries of their state Government Employees as per the provisions of section 192 of the Income-tax Act quoted above. As the Sub-Registrars accept that they are includible in the category of "person" as per section 192 of the Act, on similar reasoning, they would be includible under "person" in any other provision of the Income

SUB REGISTRAR, TAMKUHIRAJ,KUSHINAGAR vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (I&CI), LUCKNOW

SUB REGISTRAR, TAMKUHIRAJ,KUSHINAGAR vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (I&CI), LUCKNOW

M/S. LALA BHARAT LAL AND SONS,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), LUCKNOW

M/S. LALA BHARAT LAL AND SONS,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), LUCKNOW

M/S. LALA BHARAT LAL AND SONS,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), LUCKNOW

M/S SINGHAL CONCAST PVT. LTD,LUCKNOW vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-1, LUCKNOW

M/S. WIRE ONE,LUCKNOW vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)-I, LUCKNOW

ACIT CIRCLE 3, LUCKNOW vs. RAJDHANI NAGAR SAHKARI BANK LTD, LUCKNOW