Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

15 results for “TDS”+ Section 200Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune734 Chennai565 Patna466 Indore415 Bangalore402 Delhi356 Cochin330 Mumbai214 Nagpur121 Hyderabad113 Visakhapatnam93 Jaipur56 Cuttack55 Dehradun48 Jabalpur41 Raipur41 Kolkata40 Amritsar36 Ahmedabad32 Ranchi32 Surat31 Karnataka27 Rajkot26 Chandigarh21 Kerala19 Lucknow15 Jodhpur15 Agra12 Allahabad12 Panaji11 Guwahati6

Key Topics

Section 234E88 Section 200A27 TDS15 Section 220(2)12 Condonation of Delay10 Deduction10 Natural Justice10 Section 1549 Section 143(3)8 Limitation/Time-bar

JAMUNA DEVI NARESH CHANDRA MAHAVIDYALAYA,JALAUN vs. ITO-TDS, KANPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 464/LKW/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow21 May 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, DR

Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

TDS under section 200A of the Act. Since the provisions of section 200A had only been amended w.e.f. 1.06.2015, fee of Rs.24

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TUBEWELL DIVISION,BARABANKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-II, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

7

ITA 104/LKW/2021[2015-2016(26 Q - Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 Nov 2022

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

200A are so far as they are for the period prior to 1.6.2015 can be said as without any authority under law. Hence, the same can be said as illegal and invalid. ………….. ………….. 26. Under these circumstances, we find that no further discussion would be required for examining the constitutional validity of Section 234E of the Act. Save and except

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TUBEWELL DIVISION,BARABANKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-II, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 105/LKW/2021[2015-2016 (26 Q - Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 Nov 2022

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

200A are so far as they are for the period prior to 1.6.2015 can be said as without any authority under law. Hence, the same can be said as illegal and invalid. ………….. ………….. 26. Under these circumstances, we find that no further discussion would be required for examining the constitutional validity of Section 234E of the Act. Save and except

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TUBEWELL DIVISION,BARABANKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-II, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 106/LKW/2021[2015-2016 (26 Q - Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 Nov 2022

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

200A are so far as they are for the period prior to 1.6.2015 can be said as without any authority under law. Hence, the same can be said as illegal and invalid. ………….. ………….. 26. Under these circumstances, we find that no further discussion would be required for examining the constitutional validity of Section 234E of the Act. Save and except

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TUBEWELL DIVISION,BARABANKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-II, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 103/LKW/2021[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 Nov 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

200A are so far as they are for the period prior to 1.6.2015 can be said as without any authority under law. Hence, the same can be said as illegal and invalid. ………….. ………….. 26. Under these circumstances, we find that no further discussion would be required for examining the constitutional validity of Section 234E of the Act. Save and except

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TUBEWELL DIVISION ,BARABANKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-II, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 107/LKW/2021[2015-2016 (26 Q - Q 4)]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 Nov 2022

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

200A are so far as they are for the period prior to 1.6.2015 can be said as without any authority under law. Hence, the same can be said as illegal and invalid. ………….. ………….. 26. Under these circumstances, we find that no further discussion would be required for examining the constitutional validity of Section 234E of the Act. Save and except

SHIVANSH INFRAESTATE PVT. LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS, , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 124/LKW/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 154Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

TDS), Ghaziabad in ITA NO. 1172/PUN/2018. 3. The ld. DR, on the other hand, relied on the orders of the authorities below and submitted that the provisions of Section 234E were there in the statute w.e.f. 1.07.2012 and therefore the late fee u/s. 234E is applicable in the year under consideration. Moreover, it was argued that the assessment orders

SHIVANSH INFRAESTATE PVT. LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS, , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 122/LKW/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 154Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

TDS), Ghaziabad in ITA NO. 1172/PUN/2018. 3. The ld. DR, on the other hand, relied on the orders of the authorities below and submitted that the provisions of Section 234E were there in the statute w.e.f. 1.07.2012 and therefore the late fee u/s. 234E is applicable in the year under consideration. Moreover, it was argued that the assessment orders

SHIVANSH INFRAESTATE PVT.LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. CENTERALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS\, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 123/LKW/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 154Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

TDS), Ghaziabad in ITA NO. 1172/PUN/2018. 3. The ld. DR, on the other hand, relied on the orders of the authorities below and submitted that the provisions of Section 234E were there in the statute w.e.f. 1.07.2012 and therefore the late fee u/s. 234E is applicable in the year under consideration. Moreover, it was argued that the assessment orders

SHIVANSH INFRAESTATE PVT. LTD.,3RD. FLOOR, BLOCK-A , SURAJDEEP COMPLEX, JOPLING ROAD, LUCKNOW vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 121/LKW/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 154Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

TDS), Ghaziabad in ITA NO. 1172/PUN/2018. 3. The ld. DR, on the other hand, relied on the orders of the authorities below and submitted that the provisions of Section 234E were there in the statute w.e.f. 1.07.2012 and therefore the late fee u/s. 234E is applicable in the year under consideration. Moreover, it was argued that the assessment orders

SHIVANSH INFRAESTATE PVT. LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTERALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 125/LKW/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 154Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

TDS), Ghaziabad in ITA NO. 1172/PUN/2018. 3. The ld. DR, on the other hand, relied on the orders of the authorities below and submitted that the provisions of Section 234E were there in the statute w.e.f. 1.07.2012 and therefore the late fee u/s. 234E is applicable in the year under consideration. Moreover, it was argued that the assessment orders

SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT JAIL,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, for statistical purposes, both the appeals are treated as allowed

ITA 253/LKW/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow05 Feb 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Shailendra Misra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar, D.R

Section 200ASection 234E

section 200A by Finance Act, 2015 with effect from 1st June 2015 . 2. The brief facts are that the assessee preferred appeals before the ld. CIT(A) against the orders, both dated 5/5/2016, passed by the ITO(TDS

SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT JAIL,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, for statistical purposes, both the appeals are treated as allowed

ITA 252/LKW/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow05 Feb 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Shailendra Misra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar, D.R

Section 200ASection 234E

section 200A by Finance Act, 2015 with effect from 1st June 2015 . 2. The brief facts are that the assessee preferred appeals before the ld. CIT(A) against the orders, both dated 5/5/2016, passed by the ITO(TDS

AMAN INFRAPROPERTIES P. LTD,LUCKNOW vs. ACIT RANGE-1, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 387/LKW/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow16 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

For Appellant: Shri Shubham Rastogi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, D.R

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 234ESection 250Section 37

TDS vide order dated 2.9.2021 passed under section 154 r.w.s. 200A of the Act. Since the ld. CIT(A) has dealt

AMAN INFRAPROPERTIES P. LTD,LUCKNOW vs. ACIT RANGE-1, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 386/LKW/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow16 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

For Appellant: Shri Shubham Rastogi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, D.R

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 234ESection 250Section 37

TDS vide order dated 2.9.2021 passed under section 154 r.w.s. 200A of the Act. Since the ld. CIT(A) has dealt