BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 194(3)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai497Delhi449Bangalore209Karnataka147Kolkata103Chennai83Chandigarh71Ahmedabad62Jaipur40Cochin40Raipur36Indore31Dehradun24Pune22Hyderabad18Cuttack14Amritsar13Jodhpur12Telangana10Visakhapatnam8Surat7SC6Guwahati5Panaji5Lucknow4Rajkot3Allahabad3Agra2Ranchi2Calcutta1J&K1Nagpur1Orissa1Kerala1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 26319Section 143(3)8Deduction2TDS2Disallowance2Addition to Income2

SUBHASH JAISWAL ASSOCIATES,BAREILLY vs. PCIT BAREILLY, BAREILLY

ITA 100/LKW/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2017-18
Section 143(3)Section 263

194 Taxman 57 (Delhi)(HC)\nHaryana Coach Body Builders (2006) 10 SOT 736 (Delhi)\nMere lack of inquiry by Assessing Officer is not sufficient for revision\nunder section 263.\nAsstt. Order cannot be held to be erroneous, if in opinion of the CIT order\nshould have been more elaborate or that further enquiry should have\nbeen made.\nWhether what

FUTURE PHARMA PVT.LTD,KANPUR vs. PR. CIT-1, KANPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 263/LKW/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow18 Mar 2025AY 2018-19
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)
Section 144B
Section 194H
Section 263
Section 40A(2)(b)

3) The copy of 3CD is also not placed in file.\n(4) Hence, 30% of the above said amount of Rs.27,93,292/- [(30% of\nRs.93, 10,972) (70,06,972/+ 23,04,000/-] was required to be disallowed\nand added back to the total income of the assessee.\n(5) The Assessing Officer has not examined the issue

ACIT(E), LUCKNOW vs. M/S. BHAGWANT INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, BIJNOR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 219/LKW/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Oct 2025AY 2013-14
For Appellant: \nShri R. K. Agarwal CIT(DR)For Respondent: \nShri Vinod Kumar, CA
Section 11Section 143(2)

III it is stated:\n"A charitable establishment is a country, college, dispensary etc., while a\nreligious establishment is a mosque, temple etc. For these endowments\nmay be made.' At page 47 it is stated:\n"In English law the word ‘charity' has both a popular and a technical\nmeaning. The popular meaning of the word does not coincide with

ASTT. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW vs. M/S APCO INFRATECH PVT. LTD., LUCKNOW

In the result, appeal of the Revenue and Cross Objection of the assessee are dismissed, as indicated above

ITA 66/LKW/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow05 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri G. D. Padamahshali & Shri Subhash Malguriaassessment Year: 2014-15 The Asstt. Commissioner V. M/S Apco Infratech Pvt. Ltd Of Income Tax B-9, Vibhuti Khand Central Circle Ii Gomti Nagar Lucnow Lucknow Pan:Aadca5639H (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No.19/Lkw/2017 [In Ita No.66/Lkw/2017] Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S Apco Infratech Pvt. Ltd V. The Asstt. Commissioner Of B-9, Vibhuti Khand Income Tax Gomti Nagar Central Circle Ii Lucknow Lucnow Pan:Aadca5639H (Cross Objector) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Kumar Yadav, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Neil Jain, CIT (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 194Section 80Section 80I

194-H of I.T. Act by ignoring the facts that assessee could not produce any documentary evidences in this regard during the assessment proceedings whereas CIT(A) accepted fresh and unreliable evidence in violation of Rule 46A of LT. Rules without giving opportunity to Assessing Officer in this regard. 7. That the appellant craves to add or amend