Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 194clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai749 Delhi724 Bangalore284 Karnataka190 Kolkata177 Chennai133 Ahmedabad118 Chandigarh109 Jaipur77 Pune71 Cochin54 Indore54 Raipur42 Dehradun34 Hyderabad34 Cuttack33 Visakhapatnam32 Amritsar26 Jodhpur16 Telangana16 Surat13 Rajkot11 SC9 Allahabad8 Patna7 Guwahati6 Jabalpur6 Ranchi5 Panaji5 Agra4 Lucknow4 Punjab & Haryana3 J&K3 Kerala3 Calcutta2 Orissa1 Nagpur1 Varanasi1 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 2638 Section 404 Section 114 Section 143(3)3 Addition to Income3 Section 2012 TDS2 Deduction2

SHRI JASMINDER SINGH,LUCKNOW vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 562/LKW/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow22 Feb 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri T. S. Kapoorassessment Year:2013-14

Section 11Section 40

194-I of the Act, for which the assessee has not deducted any TDS. The disallowance made by invoking the provisions of section

M/S JAMA CORPORATION PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. DYT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) , KANPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 449/LKW/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow03 Feb 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 201

TDS), 8/2-B Arya Nagar, Kanpur. Kanpur. PAN:AACCM1582F (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri P. K. Kapoor, C. A. Respondent by Shri Sunil Bajpai, CIT, D.R. Date of hearing 02/02/2022 Date of pronouncement 03/02/2022 O R D E R PER T. S. KAPOOR, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of learned CIT(A)-II, Kanpur

ASTT. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW vs. M/S APCO INFRATECH PVT. LTD., LUCKNOW

In the result, appeal of the Revenue and Cross Objection of the assessee are dismissed, as indicated above

ITA 66/LKW/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow05 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri G. D. Padamahshali & Shri Subhash Malguriaassessment Year: 2014-15 The Asstt. Commissioner V. M/S Apco Infratech Pvt. Ltd Of Income Tax B-9, Vibhuti Khand Central Circle Ii Gomti Nagar Lucnow Lucknow Pan:Aadca5639H (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No.19/Lkw/2017 [In Ita No.66/Lkw/2017] Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S Apco Infratech Pvt. Ltd V. The Asstt. Commissioner Of B-9, Vibhuti Khand Income Tax Gomti Nagar Central Circle Ii Lucknow Lucnow Pan:Aadca5639H (Cross Objector) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Kumar Yadav, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Neil Jain, CIT (DR)

Section 143(3)Section 194Section 80Section 80I

194-H of I.T. Act by ignoring the facts that assessee could not produce any documentary evidences in this regard during the assessment proceedings whereas CIT(A) accepted fresh and unreliable evidence in violation of Rule 46A of LT. Rules without giving opportunity to Assessing Officer in this regard. 7. That the appellant craves to add or amend

SUBHASH JAISWAL ASSOCIATES,BAREILLY vs. PCIT BAREILLY, BAREILLY

ITA 100/LKW/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Section 143(3)Section 263

194 Taxman 57 (Delhi)(HC)\nHaryana Coach Body Builders (2006) 10 SOT 736 (Delhi)\nMere lack of inquiry by Assessing Officer is not sufficient for revision\nunder section 263.\nAsstt. Order cannot be held to be erroneous, if in opinion of the CIT order\nshould have been more elaborate or that further enquiry should have\nbeen made.\nWhether what