Search: TDS | BharatTax

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 182clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 41(1)8 Section 684 Section 69C4 Disallowance4 Addition to Income4 Section 143(3)3 Section 145(3)3 Section 412 Section 372 Section 36(1)(va)

ACIT(E), LUCKNOW vs. M/S. BHAGWANT INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, BIJNOR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 219/LKW/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

For Appellant: \nShri R. K. Agarwal CIT(DR)For Respondent: \nShri Vinod Kumar, CA

Section 11Section 143(2)

section under which the addition is being made. They cannot\nbe held to be bogus and added as an income of the appellant in absence of\nany evidence being brought on record by AO. In view of the same the\naddition made by AO is deleted.\nThis ground is allowed.”\n18. The aforesaid finding

SHRI RAMESH SINGH RANA,LUCKNOW vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 576/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: Heard

ACIT(E), LUCKNOW vs. M/S. BHAGWANT INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, BIJNOR

SHRI RAMESH SINGH RANA,LUCKNOW vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, LUCKNOW

ACIT(E), LUCKNOW vs. M/S. BHAGWANT INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, BIJNOR

SHRI RAMESH SINGH RANA,LUCKNOW vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, LUCKNOW

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CC-2,, KANPUR vs. SHRI.MOHAMMAD ASFAND AKHTAR, KANPUR

MOHD. ASFAND AKHTAR,KANPUR vs. DEPUTI COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CC-2, KANPUR