BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 167B(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai12Ahmedabad3Cuttack3Lucknow2Hyderabad2Pune2Visakhapatnam1SC1Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 12A2Exemption2TDS2

LODGE OF HARMONY NO,438EC,KANPUR vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, KANPUR

The appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 343/LKW/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow05 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Year: 2017-18 Lodge Of Harmony V. The Assessing Officer No.438Ec Exemption Ward C/O P.C. Agarwal Kanpur 15/296, Govind Niwas Civil Lines, Kanpur Tan/Pan:Aaatl2285Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Rakesh Garg, Advocate Respondent By: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, D.R. Date Of Hearing: 09 05 2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 05 08 2024 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, D.R
Section 12ASection 143(1)

TDS, advance tax and self-assessment tax). However, the Central Processing Centre (CPC), Bangalore, while processing the return ITA No.343/LKW/2023 Page 2 of 7 of income, computed the tax liability at Rs.4,62,720/- and raised a further demand of Rs.2,12,460/-. 2.1 Aggrieved, the assessee approached the ld. First Appellate Authority, challenging the tax demand and submitted before

LODGE OF HARMONY NO.438EC,KANPUR vs. A O EXAMPTION WARD, KANPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 267/LKW/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Year: 2018-19 Lodge Of Harmony No.438Ec V. The Assessing Officer C/O P.C. Agarwal Exemption Ward 15/296, Govind Niwas Kanpur Civil Lines, Kanpur Tan/Pan:Aaatl2285Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Rakesh Garg, Advocate Respondent By: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, D.R. Date Of Hearing: 04 07 2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 30 08 2024 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, D.R
Section 12A

1. Because the CIT(A) has failed to appreciate the facts and circumstances of the case and has arbitrarily held that the assessee being an AOP is not eligible for basic exemption against the income earned for the year under consideration, the order passed is bad in law, the basic exemption as claimed be allowed. 2. Because