BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

33 results for “TDS”+ Block Assessmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi977Mumbai861Bangalore611Chennai375Kolkata264Hyderabad193Karnataka184Pune172Ahmedabad149Patna134Chandigarh99Nagpur93Jaipur77Surat59Raipur47Visakhapatnam46Lucknow33Cuttack29Indore26Dehradun23Rajkot18Guwahati17Agra15Allahabad14Cochin12Jabalpur11Telangana10Jodhpur10Amritsar7Panaji3Ranchi3J&K2Calcutta1Kerala1Gauhati1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 234E55Section 145(3)22Addition to Income22Deduction20Section 194C15Disallowance15TDS14Section 15413Section 200A10Section 54F

M/S. ADICON BUILDERS & PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED,KANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 6(1), KANPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 538/LKW/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow22 Feb 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri T. S. Kapoorassessment Year:2012-13

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 40

TDS and entire receipt has been taken in turnover and tax has been paid as per I.T. Act. The Assessing Officer however required Shivtej Developers to furnish the copy of ITR/copy of account of the assessee, balance sheet and profit & loss account but on account of non receipt of any reply, the Assessing Officer held that the contention

SUBHASH JAISWAL ASSOCIATES,BAREILLY vs. PCIT BAREILLY, BAREILLY

ITA 100/LKW/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025

Showing 1–20 of 33 · Page 1 of 2

10
Section 201(1)9
Section 143(3)9
AY 2017-18
Section 143(3)Section 263

block assessment, the\nblock period comprised the assessment years 1988-89 to 1998-99 plus a\nbroken period from April 1, 1998, to July2, 1998. For this broken period of\n3 months, the assessee had shown income of Rs.13,05,103. However,\nthis was not assessed as undisclosed income, since it was reflected in\nthe books of account. The assessee

M/S ALLIANCE BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS LTD.,KANPUR vs. ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KANPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 126/LKW/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow05 Dec 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshraassessment Year: 2011-12 M/S. Alliance Builders & Asst.Commissioner Of V. Contractors Ltd Income Tax, Central Circle-2 C/O 24/4, The Mall, Kanpur. Laxmi Niwas, 10/503, Allen Ganj, Kanpur. Pan:Aaeca8217A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Shubham Rastogi, C.A. Respondent By: Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, Addl. Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing: 28 11 2024 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Shubham Rastogi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, Addl
Section 115JSection 142Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 40aSection 80I

block assessment made against assessee under section 168BC, read with section 143(2), was wholly illegal and not maintainable [In favour of assessee]” Page 10 of 33 Copy of Order is at page - 65 – 76 - of the paper book.” 6.2 On perusal of the impugned appellate order dated 29.02.2016, we find that during the appellate proceedings in the office

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

ITA 351/LKW/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 253(3)

block for reply Draft Order Sent to Range Head for approval (as per paper book of Revenue of AY 2016-17) 21-03-2024 Approval Granted for Order (as per paper book of Revenue u/s 147/143(3) of AY 2016-17) 28-03-2024 Assessment Order u/s 147/144 In the assessment order of above said period

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

ITA 349/LKW/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 253(3)

block for reply Draft Order Sent to Range Head for approval (as per paper book of Revenue of AY 2016-17) 21-03-2024 Approval Granted for Order (as per paper book of Revenue u/s 147/143(3) of AY 2016-17) 28-03-2024 Assessment Order u/s 147/144 In the assessment order of above said period

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA U.P.

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

ITA 460/LKW/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 253(3)

block for reply Draft Order Sent to Range Head for approval (as per paper book of Revenue of AY 2016-17) 21-03-2024 Approval Granted for Order (as per paper book of Revenue u/s 147/143(3) of AY 2016-17) 28-03-2024 Assessment Order u/s 147/144 In the assessment order of above said period

BASIC SHIKSHA ADHIKARI, SERV SHIKSHA ABHIYAN,AYODHYA vs. INCOME TAX OFFCER (TDS), FAIZABAD

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 52/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow19 Mar 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Ankur Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar, D.R
Section 192Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 221

Assessing Officer, however, held that the payment to the teachers is a work of contract under section 194C of the Act and so, TDS ought to have been deducted on contract basis; that the fund had been issued from the Central/State Government, to construct new building/additional rooms in the primary schools at different blocks

BASIC SHIKSHA ADHIKARI, SERV SHIKSHA ABHIYAN,AYODHYA vs. INCOME TAX OFFCER (TDS), FAIZABAD

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 53/LKW/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow19 Mar 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Ankur Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar, D.R
Section 192Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 221

Assessing Officer, however, held that the payment to the teachers is a work of contract under section 194C of the Act and so, TDS ought to have been deducted on contract basis; that the fund had been issued from the Central/State Government, to construct new building/additional rooms in the primary schools at different blocks

BASIC SHIKSHA ADHIKARI, SERV SHIKSHA ABHIYAN,AYODHYA vs. INCOME TAX OFFCER (TDS), FAIZABAD

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 51/LKW/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow19 Mar 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Ankur Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar, D.R
Section 192Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 221

Assessing Officer, however, held that the payment to the teachers is a work of contract under section 194C of the Act and so, TDS ought to have been deducted on contract basis; that the fund had been issued from the Central/State Government, to construct new building/additional rooms in the primary schools at different blocks

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT, (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

ITA 347/LKW/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 145(3)Section 54FSection 56(2)(vii)Section 69

Assessment year:2021-22 & 20-21 Rakesh Kumar Pandey, S/o Shri Surya Narayan Pandey, Vill-Devarda, Block-Belsar, Gonda-271401 PAN:ATIPP6520B (Appellant) Vs. A.C.I.T., Central Circle-2, Lucknow. (Respondent) O R D E R PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, A.M. (A) For the sake of convenience and brevity these appeals and Cross Objections (“COs” for short) pertaining to the same

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT(CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

ITA 350/LKW/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 250Section 253(3)

Block-Belsar, Gonda-271401 PAN:ATIPP6520B (Appellant) Vs. A.C.I.T., Central Circle-2, Lucknow. (Respondent) Revenue by Shri H. S. Usmani, CIT (D.R.) Assessee by Shri Mahendra Kumar, F.C.A. Shri Reghunath Mishra, Advocate O R D E R PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, A.M. (A) For the sake of convenience and brevity these appeals and Cross Objections (“COs” for short) pertaining

SHIVANSH INFRAESTATE PVT. LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS, , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 124/LKW/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 154Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shivansh Infraestate Pvt. Ltd., Vs. ACIT, 3rd Floor, Block-A, Surajdeep Central Processing Cell-TDS, Complex

SHIVANSH INFRAESTATE PVT. LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTERALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 125/LKW/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 154Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shivansh Infraestate Pvt. Ltd., Vs. ACIT, 3rd Floor, Block-A, Surajdeep Central Processing Cell-TDS, Complex

SHIVANSH INFRAESTATE PVT. LTD.,3RD. FLOOR, BLOCK-A , SURAJDEEP COMPLEX, JOPLING ROAD, LUCKNOW vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 121/LKW/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 154Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shivansh Infraestate Pvt. Ltd., Vs. ACIT, 3rd Floor, Block-A, Surajdeep Central Processing Cell-TDS, Complex

SHIVANSH INFRAESTATE PVT.LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. CENTERALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS\, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 123/LKW/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 154Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shivansh Infraestate Pvt. Ltd., Vs. ACIT, 3rd Floor, Block-A, Surajdeep Central Processing Cell-TDS, Complex

SHIVANSH INFRAESTATE PVT. LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS, , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 122/LKW/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 154Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shivansh Infraestate Pvt. Ltd., Vs. ACIT, 3rd Floor, Block-A, Surajdeep Central Processing Cell-TDS, Complex

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA

ITA 405/LKW/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2022-23
Section 145(3)Section 54FSection 69Section 69A

Assessment year:2021-22 & 20-21\nRakesh Kumar Pandey,\nS/o Shri Surya Narayan Pandey,\nVill-Devarda, Block-Belsar,\nGonda-271401\nPAN:ATIPP6520B\n(Appellant)\nVs. A.C.I.T.,\nCentral Circle-2,\nLucknow.\n(Respondent)\nRevenue by Shri H. S. Usmani, CIT (D.R.)\nAssessee by Shri Mahendra Kumar, F.C.A.\nShri Reghunath Mishra, Advocate\nO R D E R\nPER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA UP

ITA 398/LKW/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2015-16
Section 145(3)Section 54FSection 69

Block-Belsar,\nGonda-271401\nPAN:ATIPP6520B\n(Appellant)\nVs.\nA.C.I.T.,\nCentral Circle-2,\nLucknow.\n(Respondent)\nRevenue by Shri H. S. Usmani, CIT (D.R.)\nAssessee by Shri Mahendra Kumar, F.C.A.\nShri Reghunath Mishra, Advocate\nO R D E R\nPER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, A.M.\n(A) For the sake of convenience and brevity these appeals and Cross\nObjections

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA UP

ITA 399/LKW/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2016-17
Section 145(3)Section 54FSection 69

Block-Belsar,\nGonda-271401\nPAN:ATIPP6520B\n(Appellant)\nVs. A.C.I.T.,\nCentral Circle-2,\nLucknow.\n(Respondent)\nRevenue by Shri H. S. Usmani, CIT (D.R.)\nAssessee by Shri Mahendra Kumar, F.C.A.\nShri Reghunath Mishra, Advocate\nO R D E R\nPER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, A.M.\n(A) For the sake of convenience and brevity these appeals and Cross\nObjections

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT, (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

ITA 352/LKW/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2019-20
Section 145(3)Section 54FSection 69

Block-Belsar,\nGonda-271401\nPAN:ATIPP6520B\n(Appellant)\nVs.\nA.C.I.T.,\nCentral Circle-2,\nLucknow.\n(Respondent)\n\nO R D E R\n\nPER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, A.M.\n(A) For the sake of convenience and brevity these appeals and Cross\nObjections (“COs” for short) pertaining to the same assessee are hereby\ndisposed of through this consolidated order. Grounds taken