BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

21 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 69Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai301Delhi185Jaipur89Bangalore44Hyderabad39Indore34Chandigarh32Chennai21Kolkata21Agra19Guwahati16Ahmedabad12Surat12Pune12Nagpur9Amritsar8Jodhpur4Lucknow4Visakhapatnam4Raipur2Rajkot1Allahabad1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 14735Section 14835Addition to Income20Section 13218Section 69A17Section 115J17Condonation of Delay17Section 143(2)3Section 250

INDIAN EXPLOSIVES PVT LTD,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 272/KOL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Sept 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Sri Rajesh Kumar & Sonjoy Sarma

Section 92C

transfer pricing adjustment on account of royalty payment has been deleted. Accordingly, we direct the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 1,70,19,072/-. Hence, ground no. 5 raised by the assessee is allowed. 11. The issue raised in ground no. 6 is against the disallowance of leave encashment

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND SPONGE AND IRON PRIVATE LIMITED , PATNA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1595/KOL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2015-16
Section 115J

Showing 1–20 of 21 · Page 1 of 2

2
Section 142(1)2
Search & Seizure2
Penny Stock2
Section 132
Section 147
Section 148
Section 69A

69C of the Act. We, therefore, quash the orders u/s 263 of the Act\nand allow the appeals of the assessee.\nIt would kindly be appreciated that this decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal is also not\napplicable in the facts and circumstances of the case as the in this case the sales were\ngenuine and which were matched with

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND SPONGE AND IRON PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1597/KOL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2017-18
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

69C of the Act. We, therefore, quash the orders u/s 263 of the Act\nand allow the appeals of the assessee.\nIt would kindly be appreciated that this decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal is also not\napplicable in the facts and circumstances of the case as the in this case the sales were\ngenuine and which were matched with

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1704/KOL/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2023-24
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

69C of the Act. We, therefore, quash the orders u/s 263 of the Act\nand allow the appeals of the assessee.\nIt would kindly be appreciated that this decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal is also not\napplicable in the facts and circumstances of the case as the in this case the sales were\ngenuine and which were matched with

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1700/KOL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri Manish Rastogi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Pandey, DR
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

69C of the Act. We, therefore, quash the orders u/s 263 of the Act\nand allow the appeals of the assessee.\nIt would kindly be appreciated that this decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal is also not\napplicable in the facts and circumstances of the case as the in this case the sales were\ngenuine and which were matched with

WINSHER COMMERCIAL PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 14(2), PRESENTLY D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-11(1), KOLKATAKOLKATA, KOLKATA

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 668/KOL/2022[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 May 2024AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No. 668/Kol/2022 Assessment Year: 2014-2015 Winsher Commercial Pvt. Limited,…....….Appellant C/O. Subash Agarwal & Associates, Advocates, Siddha Gibson, 1, Gibson Lane, Suite 213, 2Nd Floor, Kolkata-700069 [Pan:Aaacw3125H] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,………………………………Respondent Ward-14(2), Kolkata, [Presently Dcit, Circle-11(1), Kolkata], Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata-700069 Appearances By: Shri Siddharth Agarwal, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri B.K. Singh, Jcit, Sr. D.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 21, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : May 13, 2024 O R D E R

Section 10(38)Section 68

transferred by way of sale proceeds. As a result, some of BSE/CSE listed penny stocks were identified, which have been used for generating bogus LTCG. The SEBI vide order No. WTM/KMA/ND/415/2011 dated 12.03.2014 had suspended the; trading of shares (Penny Stock) w.e.f. 21.03.2014 due to non- compliance of Listing agreement. The AO has observed that the appellant

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1395/KOL/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2015-2016
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

69C of the Act. We, therefore, quash the orders u/s 263 of the Act\nand allow the appeals of the assessee.\nIt would kindly be appreciated that this decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal is also not\napplicable in the facts and circumstances of the case as the in this case the sales were\ngenuine and which were matched with

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1396/KOL/2025[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2017-2018
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

69C of the Act. We, therefore, quash the orders u/s 263 of the Act\nand allow the appeals of the assessee.\nIt would kindly be appreciated that this decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal is also not\napplicable in the facts and circumstances of the case as the in this case the sales were\ngenuine and which were matched with

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1397/KOL/2025[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2018-2019
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

69C of the Act. We, therefore, quash the orders u/s 263 of the Act\nand allow the appeals of the assessee.\nIt would kindly be appreciated that this decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal is also not\napplicable in the facts and circumstances of the case as the in this case the sales were\ngenuine and which were matched with

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1398/KOL/2025[2023-2024]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2023-2024
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

69C of the Act. We, therefore, quash the orders u/s 263 of the Act\nand allow the appeals of the assessee.\nIt would kindly be appreciated that this decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal is also not\napplicable in the facts and circumstances of the case as the in this case the sales were\ngenuine and which were matched with

BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PVT. LTD.,,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1399/KOL/2025[2023-2024]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2023-2024
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

69C of the Act. We, therefore, quash the orders u/s 263 of the Act\nand allow the appeals of the assessee.\nIt would kindly be appreciated that this decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal is also not\napplicable in the facts and circumstances of the case as the in this case the sales were\ngenuine and which were matched with

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND LEASE FIN PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1759/KOL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2020-21
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

69C of the Act. We, therefore, quash the orders u/s 263 of the Act\nand allow the appeals of the assessee.\nIt would kindly be appreciated that this decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal is also not\napplicable in the facts and circumstances of the case as the in this case the sales were\ngenuine and which were matched with

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1699/KOL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Manish Rastogi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Pandey, DR
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

69C of the Act. We, therefore, quash the orders u/s 263 of the Act and allow the appeals of the assessee. ----------------------------------------------------------- It would kindly be appreciated that this decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal is also not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case as the in this case the sales were genuine and which were matched with

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1701/KOL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2017-18
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

69C of the Act. We, therefore, quash the orders u/s 263 of the Act\nand allow the appeals of the assessee.\nIt would kindly be appreciated that this decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal is also not\napplicable in the facts and circumstances of the case as the in this case the sales were\ngenuine and which were matched with

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1702/KOL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Manish Rastogi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Pandey, DR
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

69C of the Act. We, therefore, quash the orders u/s 263 of the Act and allow the appeals of the assessee. ----------------------------------------------------------- It would kindly be appreciated that this decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal is also not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case as the in this case the sales were genuine and which were matched with

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1703/KOL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Manish Rastogi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Pandey, DR
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

69C of the Act. We, therefore, quash the orders u/s 263 of the Act and allow the appeals of the assessee. ----------------------------------------------------------- It would kindly be appreciated that this decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal is also not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case as the in this case the sales were genuine and which were matched with

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND SPONGE AND IRON PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1596/KOL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Manish Rastogi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Pandey, DR
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

69C of the Act. We, therefore, quash the orders u/s 263 of the Act and allow the appeals of the assessee. ----------------------------------------------------------- It would kindly be appreciated that this decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal is also not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case as the in this case the sales were genuine and which were matched with

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND SPONGE AND IRON PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1598/KOL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2018-19
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

69C of the Act. We, therefore, quash the orders u/s 263 of the Act\nand allow the appeals of the assessee.\nIt would kindly be appreciated that this decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal is also not\napplicable in the facts and circumstances of the case as the in this case the sales were\ngenuine and which were matched with

GOPAL & SONS HUF,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 32(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1701/KOL/2024[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Jan 2025AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Manish Rastogi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Pandey, DR
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

69C of the Act. We, therefore, quash the orders u/s 263 of the Act and allow the appeals of the assessee. ----------------------------------------------------------- It would kindly be appreciated that this decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal is also not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case as the in this case the sales were genuine and which were matched with

NAVANSH VINIMAY PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 8(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 724/KOL/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 May 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250

69C of the Act along with the sum of Rs. 63,76,486/- added under section 68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit. 4. Aggrieved with the assessment order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), who vide order dated 25.10.2022 dismissed the appeal. The relevant extracts from the order of Ld. CIT(A) containing