DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND SPONGE AND IRON PRIVATE LIMITED , PATNA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

55,514/-, M/s Ranisati Coke Trading\nco. of ₹40,38,23,767/- and M/s Steel Centre of ₹10,78,87,644/-. The\nId. AO discussed in detail the facts qua these parties and entry\noperators involved in providing accommodation entries. The Id. AO also\nnoted that the entire purchases and sales were done through same\ncommission agents and these were

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND SPONGE AND IRON PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

55,514/-, M/s Ranisati Coke Trading\nco. of ₹40,38,23,767/- and M/s Steel Centre of ₹10,78,87,644/-. The\nId. AO discussed in detail the facts qua these parties and entry\noperators involved in providing accommodation entries. The Id. AO also\nnoted that the entire purchases and sales were done through same\ncommission agents and these were

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

55,514/-, M/s Ranisati Coke Trading\nco. of ₹40,38,23,767/- and M/s Steel Centre of ₹10,78,87,644/-. The\nId. AO discussed in detail the facts qua these parties and entry\noperators involved in providing accommodation entries. The Id. AO also\nnoted that the entire purchases and sales were done through same\ncommission agents and these were

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

55,514/-, M/s Ranisati Coke Trading\nco. of ₹40,38,23,767/- and M/s Steel Centre of ₹10,78,87,644/-. The\nId. AO discussed in detail the facts qua these parties and entry\noperators involved in providing accommodation entries. The Id. AO also\nnoted that the entire purchases and sales were done through same\ncommission agents and these were

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

55,514/-, M/s Ranisati Coke Trading\nco. of ₹40,38,23,767/- and M/s Steel Centre of ₹10,78,87,644/-. The\nId. AO discussed in detail the facts qua these parties and entry\noperators involved in providing accommodation entries. The Id. AO also\nnoted that the entire purchases and sales were done through same\ncommission agents and these were

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND LEASE FIN PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

55,514/-, M/s Ranisati Coke Trading\nco. of ₹40,38,23,767/- and M/s Steel Centre of ₹10,78,87,644/-. The\nId. AO discussed in detail the facts qua these parties and entry\noperators involved in providing accommodation entries. The Id. AO also\nnoted that the entire purchases and sales were done through same\ncommission agents and these were

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND SPONGE AND IRON PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

55,514/-, M/s Ranisati Coke Trading\nco. of ₹40,38,23,767/- and M/s Steel Centre of ₹10,78,87,644/-. The\nId. AO discussed in detail the facts qua these parties and entry\noperators involved in providing accommodation entries. The Id. AO also\nnoted that the entire purchases and sales were done through same\ncommission agents and these were

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

55,514/-, M/s Ranisati Coke Trading\nco. of ₹40,38,23,767/- and M/s Steel Centre of ₹10,78,87,644/-. The\nId. AO discussed in detail the facts qua these parties and entry\noperators involved in providing accommodation entries. The Id. AO also\nnoted that the entire purchases and sales were done through same\ncommission agents and these were

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

55,514/-, M/s Ranisati Coke Trading\nco. of ₹40,38,23,767/- and M/s Steel Centre of ₹10,78,87,644/-. The\nId. AO discussed in detail the facts qua these parties and entry\noperators involved in providing accommodation entries. The Id. AO also\nnoted that the entire purchases and sales were done through same\ncommission agents and these were

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

55,514/-, M/s Ranisati Coke Trading\nco. of ₹40,38,23,767/- and M/s Steel Centre of ₹10,78,87,644/-. The\nId. AO discussed in detail the facts qua these parties and entry\noperators involved in providing accommodation entries. The Id. AO also\nnoted that the entire purchases and sales were done through same\ncommission agents and these were

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

55,514/-, M/s Ranisati Coke Trading\nco. of ₹40,38,23,767/- and M/s Steel Centre of ₹10,78,87,644/-. The\nId. AO discussed in detail the facts qua these parties and entry\noperators involved in providing accommodation entries. The Id. AO also\nnoted that the entire purchases and sales were done through same\ncommission agents and these were

BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PVT. LTD.,,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

55,514/-, M/s Ranisati Coke Trading\nco. of ₹40,38,23,767/- and M/s Steel Centre of ₹10,78,87,644/-. The\nId. AO discussed in detail the facts qua these parties and entry\noperators involved in providing accommodation entries. The Id. AO also\nnoted that the entire purchases and sales were done through same\ncommission agents and these were

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND SPONGE AND IRON PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

55,514/-, M/s Ranisati Coke Trading co. of ₹40,38,23,767/- and M/s Steel Centre of ₹10,78,87,644/-. The ld. AO discussed in detail the facts qua these parties and entry operators involved in providing accommodation entries. The ld. AO also noted that the entire purchases and sales were done through same commission agents and these were

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

55,514/-, M/s Ranisati Coke Trading co. of ₹40,38,23,767/- and M/s Steel Centre of ₹10,78,87,644/-. The ld. AO discussed in detail the facts qua these parties and entry operators involved in providing accommodation entries. The ld. AO also noted that the entire purchases and sales were done through same commission agents and these were

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

55,514/-, M/s Ranisati Coke Trading co. of ₹40,38,23,767/- and M/s Steel Centre of ₹10,78,87,644/-. The ld. AO discussed in detail the facts qua these parties and entry operators involved in providing accommodation entries. The ld. AO also noted that the entire purchases and sales were done through same commission agents and these were

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

55,514/-, M/s Ranisati Coke Trading co. of ₹40,38,23,767/- and M/s Steel Centre of ₹10,78,87,644/-. The ld. AO discussed in detail the facts qua these parties and entry operators involved in providing accommodation entries. The ld. AO also noted that the entire purchases and sales were done through same commission agents and these were

GOPAL & SONS HUF,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 32(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

55,514/-, M/s Ranisati Coke Trading co. of ₹40,38,23,767/- and M/s Steel Centre of ₹10,78,87,644/-. The ld. AO discussed in detail the facts qua these parties and entry operators involved in providing accommodation entries. The ld. AO also noted that the entire purchases and sales were done through same commission agents and these were

BALHANUMAN COMMODEAL PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-5(4), KOLKATA

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2012-13

55,000/- and the reserves and surpluses are Rs 23,95,09,565 as on 31.3.2012. Thus on first glance it may be said that this company had substantial reserves and surpluses to invest in the appellant company. However if we see Note No 3 which provides the details of these reserves and surpluses, it gives a different story. These