D.C.I.T CIR - 10(1), KOLKATA vs. M/S EUREKA FORBS LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

Transfer Pricing\nOfficer, Kolkata (\"TPO\") u/s 92CA(1) of the Act. The Ld. TPO computed\nthe Arm's Length Price and passed an Order u/s 92CA(3) of the Act on\nJanuary 25, 2016. On receipt of the Ld. TPO's order, the Draft\nAssessment Order was passed on 10.03.2016 and was sent to the\nassessee. Vide letter dated 22nd

D.C.I.T CIR - 10(1), KOLKATA vs. M/S EUREKA FORBS LTD, KOLKATA

section 40A(2)(a)\nof the Act states that no disallowance on account of any expenditure being\nexcessive shall be made in respect of specified domestic transaction referred to\nin section 92A of the Act, if such transaction is at arm's length price as defined\nin clause (li) of Section 92F of the Act. Furthermore, such disallowance

HALDIA PETROCHEMICALS LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR-8, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri P.M.Jagtap, Am & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm ] Assessment Year : 2004-05

35D of the Act and was confirmed by the CIT(A) which is evident from para-3 of page-2 of impugned order. Therefore, ground No.1 raised by the revenue is misconceived and is dismissed. 14. Ground No.2 raised by the Revenue is relating to delation of disallowance of Rs.7,23,60,000/- made on account of loss

DCIT, CIR-11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S HALDIA PETROCHEMICALS LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri P.M.Jagtap, Am & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm ] Assessment Year : 2004-05

35D of the Act and was confirmed by the CIT(A) which is evident from para-3 of page-2 of impugned order. Therefore, ground No.1 raised by the revenue is misconceived and is dismissed. 14. Ground No.2 raised by the Revenue is relating to delation of disallowance of Rs.7,23,60,000/- made on account of loss