BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

33 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 194Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai127Delhi105Bangalore65Ahmedabad48Kolkata33Chennai33Cochin25Indore21Chandigarh20Raipur17Cuttack13Hyderabad10Jaipur10Visakhapatnam8Kerala5Lucknow4Amritsar4Karnataka3Rajkot2Guwahati2Surat2SC2Telangana1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 80I45Section 143(3)28Section 115J24Deduction21Section 4016Section 8015Disallowance15Addition to Income14Section 194C11Set Off of Losses

I.T.O WD - 7(2),KOLKATA., KOLKATA vs. M/S WINSOME BREWERIES LIMITED, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of revenue is dismissed

ITA 622/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Dec 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Appellant: Shri Shital C. Das, JCIT, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kataruka, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 194JSection 40

section 194C and the circulars issued by the CBDT from time to time, it is clear that the term 'work' does not cover the following: (a) Contracts for sale of goods. (b) Where contractor undertakes to supply any article or thing fabricated according to the specifications given by the payer and the property in such article or thing passes

Showing 1–20 of 33 · Page 1 of 2

11
Section 6810
Depreciation10

M/S VODAFONE EAST LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWN AS VODAFONE ESSAR EAST LIMITED),KOLKATA vs. A.D.I.T RANGE - 7,KOL., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 1864/KOL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Sept 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 143(3)Section 194ISection 40

transfers all incoming calls to the temporary phone number which terminates at the device of VEL’s subscriber, currently roaming in Delhi and using the network of the Visiting Operator (i.e. the Visiting Network). 4.3. Accordingly, pursuant to the aforesaid roaming arrangements, VEL’s subscribers are able to make and receive calls while they are in the territory of such

ITO(TDS),WD-58(4),KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. PACEMAN SALES PROMOTION PVT LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed and cross objection of the assessee is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 1296/KOL/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 May 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: : Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Rajaram Choudhury, CA, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Tanuj Kr. Neogi, JCIT, ld.Sr.DR
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)

transfer of the property, but it is one for work and labour. 7.2. We find that the provisions of section 194C of the Act specify that any person responsible for paying any sum to any contractor for carrying out any work was ITA No. 1296/Kol/2012 & 6 & CO No.12/Kol/2013 C-AM M/s.Paceman Sales Promotion Pvt. Ltd required to deduct

M/S ADHUNIK INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. JCIT, RG-10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1281/KOL/2015[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 May 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri A.T.Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No.1281 /Kol/2015 Assessment Year : 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D.Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT, Sr.Dr
Section 143(3)Section 80I

price that such goods or services would ordinarily fetch in the open market.] (9) Where any amount of profits and gains of an 76[undertaking] or of an enterprise in the case of an assessee is claimed and allowed under this section for any assessment year, deduction to the extent of such profits and gains shall not be allowed under

D.C.I.T.-CC-2(4), KOLKATA vs. M/S GLOBAL WOOL ALLIANCE PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 260/KOL/2020[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Nov 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 92C

Section 92C(2) read with Rule 10B(1)(a) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 wherein it has been explicitly provided that where more than one uncontrolled transactions or prices are available then the ALP shall be the arithmetic mean of such prices. The Ld. CIT(A) also relied on the decision of Hon’ble ITAT, Delhi in the case

ITO, WD-33(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S SOMDATT BUILDERS SIMPLEX JV, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 287/KOL/2014[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Oct 2016AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am & Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.285, 286, 287 & 288/Kol/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years :2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2007-08) Income Tax Officer, Vs. M/S Somdatt Builders Ward-33(4), Kolkata, 10-B, Simplex Jv, 12/1, Neelie Middleton Row, 3Rd Floor, Sengupta Sarani, Kolkata- Kolkata-700071 87 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabas 9777 J .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, FCAFor Respondent: None
Section 143(3)Section 80

prices of material. A cumulative result of all these things makes out the assessee a developer of an infrastructural facility but not a mere works contractor. 7. Argument of the learned DR is that the Government is the employer of the assessee by providing investment and the assessee receives running account payment/lump sum payments as such assessee is executing

ITO, WD-33(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S SOMDATT BUILDERS SIMPLEX JV, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 285/KOL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Oct 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am & Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.285, 286, 287 & 288/Kol/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years :2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2007-08) Income Tax Officer, Vs. M/S Somdatt Builders Ward-33(4), Kolkata, 10-B, Simplex Jv, 12/1, Neelie Middleton Row, 3Rd Floor, Sengupta Sarani, Kolkata- Kolkata-700071 87 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabas 9777 J .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, FCAFor Respondent: None
Section 143(3)Section 80

prices of material. A cumulative result of all these things makes out the assessee a developer of an infrastructural facility but not a mere works contractor. 7. Argument of the learned DR is that the Government is the employer of the assessee by providing investment and the assessee receives running account payment/lump sum payments as such assessee is executing

ITO, WD-33(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S SOMDATT BUILDERS SIMPLEX JV, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 286/KOL/2014[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Oct 2016AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am & Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.285, 286, 287 & 288/Kol/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years :2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2007-08) Income Tax Officer, Vs. M/S Somdatt Builders Ward-33(4), Kolkata, 10-B, Simplex Jv, 12/1, Neelie Middleton Row, 3Rd Floor, Sengupta Sarani, Kolkata- Kolkata-700071 87 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabas 9777 J .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, FCAFor Respondent: None
Section 143(3)Section 80

prices of material. A cumulative result of all these things makes out the assessee a developer of an infrastructural facility but not a mere works contractor. 7. Argument of the learned DR is that the Government is the employer of the assessee by providing investment and the assessee receives running account payment/lump sum payments as such assessee is executing

ITO, WD-33(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S SOMDATT BUILDERS SIMPLEX JV, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 288/KOL/2014[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Oct 2016AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am & Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.285, 286, 287 & 288/Kol/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years :2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2007-08) Income Tax Officer, Vs. M/S Somdatt Builders Ward-33(4), Kolkata, 10-B, Simplex Jv, 12/1, Neelie Middleton Row, 3Rd Floor, Sengupta Sarani, Kolkata- Kolkata-700071 87 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabas 9777 J .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, FCAFor Respondent: None
Section 143(3)Section 80

prices of material. A cumulative result of all these things makes out the assessee a developer of an infrastructural facility but not a mere works contractor. 7. Argument of the learned DR is that the Government is the employer of the assessee by providing investment and the assessee receives running account payment/lump sum payments as such assessee is executing

D.C.I.T CC - XXVIII,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S SPML INFRA LTD (ERSTWHILE M/S SUBHAS PROJECTS& MARKETING LTD), KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 1291/KOL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Aug 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 80Section 80l

194C also, “works contract” does not include a contract wherein the contractor in addition to employing labour, procures material from a third party. Thus, contracts involving mere labour of the contractor are included in the purview of “works contract”. Further assessee submitted that explanatory memorandum in the Finance Bill, 2007 has explained the purpose extending tax benefit

DCIT, CIRCLE - 6, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. NARIMAN FINVEST (P) LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands dismissed and that of assessee’s CO is partly allowed

ITA 1614/KOL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Aug 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 43(5)

transfer of the commodity or scrips: Provided that for the purposes of this clause- (a) A contract in respect of raw materials or merchandise entered into by a person in the course of his manufacturing or merchanting business to guard against loss through future price fluctuations in respect of his contracts for actual delivery of goods manufactured

ACIT, CIR-33, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S HO HUP SIMPLEX JV, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 692/KOL/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Mar 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 692/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2010-11 Acit, Circle-33, Kolkata -Vs- M/S Ho Hup Simplex Jv [Pan: Aaaah 0653 B] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Arindam Bhattacharjee, Addl. CITFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, FCA
Section 143(3)Section 80I

194C need not be restricted to "works contracts" (i.e. labour contracts) because the sub-section expressly includes supply of labour to carry out work. In other words, it implied that works contract means supply of labour to carry out work. 6.9. Thus from the above, it could be safely concluded that a works contract constitutes a contract under which

HARSHWARDHAN GEMS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 12(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of revenue and that of assessee are dismissed

ITA 1070/KOL/2010[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Feb 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Appellant: Shri S. M. Surana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. B. Pramanik, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 133(6)Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 68

Transfer Register etc. it would constitute acceptable proof or acceptable explanation by the assessee. The revenue would not be justified in drawing an adverse inference only because the share applicant failed to respond to notices. As held by Hon’ble Delhi High Court AO is duty-bound to investigate the creditworthiness of the share applicant and the genuineness

ITO, WARD - 12(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. HARSHWARDHAN GEMS P. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of revenue and that of assessee are dismissed

ITA 1337/KOL/2010[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Feb 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Appellant: Shri S. M. Surana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. B. Pramanik, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 133(6)Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 68

Transfer Register etc. it would constitute acceptable proof or acceptable explanation by the assessee. The revenue would not be justified in drawing an adverse inference only because the share applicant failed to respond to notices. As held by Hon’ble Delhi High Court AO is duty-bound to investigate the creditworthiness of the share applicant and the genuineness

ANJALI JEWELLERS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. CIT, KOLKATA-IV, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 2252/KOL/2014[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Mar 2016AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 263Section 40A(2)

194C, wherever applicable. Some parties were examined u/s. 133(6) Packing material 55,72,915 Complete party-wise details submitted ITA No.2252/Kol/2014 A.Y.2010-11 Anjali Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT, Cir-10(1) Kol. Page 23 1,20,11,512 Testing & Paid to accredited agencies. TDS u/s. refining charges 194J deducted and paid 10,87,26,931 Melting loss

D.C.I.T CIR - 3,KOLATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S MANTORA OIL PRODUCTS LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 2252/KOL/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Mar 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 263Section 40A(2)

194C, wherever applicable. Some parties were examined u/s. 133(6) Packing material 55,72,915 Complete party-wise details submitted ITA No.2252/Kol/2014 A.Y.2010-11 Anjali Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT, Cir-10(1) Kol. Page 23 1,20,11,512 Testing & Paid to accredited agencies. TDS u/s. refining charges 194J deducted and paid 10,87,26,931 Melting loss

I.T.O WD - 8(4),KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S SPML INFRA LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, to sum up

ITA 2286/KOL/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Mar 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm]

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Arup Kr. Sinha, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 80I

sections, designs, working drawings etc. It was to submit the detailed design and the execution drawings such as site plans, general arrangement drawings, L-sections, plans, architectural, structural drawings and all working drawings, for approval. (ii) Materials: All the material required for the work was to be provided by the assessee. (iii) Labour: The assessee was to pay wages

M/S SMPL INFRA LTD ( EASTWHILE M/S SUBHAS PROJECTS & MARKETING LTD),KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T CC - XXVIII,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, to sum up

ITA 2035/KOL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Mar 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm]

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Arup Kr. Sinha, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 80I

sections, designs, working drawings etc. It was to submit the detailed design and the execution drawings such as site plans, general arrangement drawings, L-sections, plans, architectural, structural drawings and all working drawings, for approval. (ii) Materials: All the material required for the work was to be provided by the assessee. (iii) Labour: The assessee was to pay wages

M/S BALMER LAWRIES & CO. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(IT) WD-1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 2079/KOL/2014[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Apr 2016AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2012-13 M/S Balmer Lawrie & Co. V/S. Income Tax Officer Ltd., 21, N.S.Road, (International Taxation), Kolkata-700 001 Ward-1(1), Aayakar [Pan No. Aabcb 0984 E] Bhawan (Poorva), 2Nd Floor, R. No.215, 110, Shanti Pally, Kolkata- 700 107 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri M.K.Poddar, Sr-Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri C.P.Bhatia, Jcit-Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 18-02-2016 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 27-04-2016 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement

Section 195Section 201(1)Section 5(2)(b)

194C casts an obligation to deduct TAS in respect of "any sum paid to any resident". Similarly, sections 194EE and 194F, inter alia, provide for deduction of tax in respect of "any amount" referred to in the specified ITA No.ITA No.2079/Kol/2014 A.Y. 2012-13 M/s Blmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd. v. ITO(IT) Wd-1(1), Kol. Page 17 provisions

M/S INDIA FINANCE LTD,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T CC - VIII,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 678/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Jul 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm]

For Appellant: Shri Manoj Kataruka, ARFor Respondent: Shri Niraj Kumar, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

194C of the Act, and applying the test of human probabilities , it could be safely concluded that there was no movement of goods for alleged purchase and sale of goods. It was also contended that the transportation is loaded in the purchase and sale bills. We find that no supporting bills were produced to support this argument. The assessee