BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 194Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai65Chandigarh61Delhi28Chennai24Bangalore20Ahmedabad9Hyderabad7Kolkata7Nagpur4Rajkot3Cochin2Pune2Jaipur2Cuttack1Jodhpur1Telangana1Allahabad1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 14A9Section 406Section 194A6Section 2635Section 143(3)5Section 144C(3)3Section 43B3Section 1543Exemption3Disallowance

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS LTD., , KOLKATA

ITA 219/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Feb 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L.Saini

Section 143(3)Section 144C(3)Section 14ASection 154Section 43B

price contract and in terms of AS-7 issued by Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) made a provision for future foreseeable losses and claimed deduction of such a provision. The Revenue disallowed the provision made for such foreseeable losses. The Tribunal concurred with the stand of the assessee that such a provision was an allowable deduction. The relevant

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS LTD., , KOLKATA

ITA 218/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed
3
Deduction3
TDS3
ITAT Kolkata
28 Feb 2020
AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L.Saini

Section 143(3)Section 144C(3)Section 14ASection 154Section 43B

price contract and in terms of AS-7 issued by Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) made a provision for future foreseeable losses and claimed deduction of such a provision. The Revenue disallowed the provision made for such foreseeable losses. The Tribunal concurred with the stand of the assessee that such a provision was an allowable deduction. The relevant

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS LTD., , KOLKATA

ITA 217/KOL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Feb 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L.Saini

Section 143(3)Section 144C(3)Section 14ASection 154Section 43B

price contract and in terms of AS-7 issued by Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) made a provision for future foreseeable losses and claimed deduction of such a provision. The Revenue disallowed the provision made for such foreseeable losses. The Tribunal concurred with the stand of the assessee that such a provision was an allowable deduction. The relevant

WEST BENGAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,KOLKATA vs. THE I.T.O, WARD-11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result ITA No.213/Kol/2012 of the revenue is partly allowed

ITA 1739/KOL/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Dec 2015AY 2005-06

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am ] Assessment Year : 2005-06

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Bhattacharya, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Niraj Kumar, CIT(DR)
Section 194ASection 40

price and registration of sale deed by the competent Authority. If, however, possession of plot is delayed by HIDCO by more than 6(six) from the schedule date of possession the Corporation shall pay interest on instalments already paid by the allottee during such extended period at the prevailing fixed term deposit rates for similar period offered by the State

WEST BENGAL HOUSING INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result ITA No.213/Kol/2012 of the revenue is partly allowed

ITA 113/KOL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Dec 2015AY 2008-09

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am ] Assessment Year : 2005-06

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Bhattacharya, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Niraj Kumar, CIT(DR)
Section 194ASection 40

price and registration of sale deed by the competent Authority. If, however, possession of plot is delayed by HIDCO by more than 6(six) from the schedule date of possession the Corporation shall pay interest on instalments already paid by the allottee during such extended period at the prevailing fixed term deposit rates for similar period offered by the State

DCIT, CIRCLE - 11, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. WEST BENGAL HOUSING INFRASTRUCTURE DEV. CORPN. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result ITA No.213/Kol/2012 of the revenue is partly allowed

ITA 213/KOL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Dec 2015AY 2008-09

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am ] Assessment Year : 2005-06

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Bhattacharya, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Niraj Kumar, CIT(DR)
Section 194ASection 40

price and registration of sale deed by the competent Authority. If, however, possession of plot is delayed by HIDCO by more than 6(six) from the schedule date of possession the Corporation shall pay interest on instalments already paid by the allottee during such extended period at the prevailing fixed term deposit rates for similar period offered by the State

SRI HARTAJ SEWA SINGH,KOLKATA vs. DCIT(IT), CIRCLE-1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 1011/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Apr 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Raviassessment Year:2012-13

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

Transfer Pricing Officer for determining the Arm Length’s Price for the transactions as discussed above. The assessee during the year under consideration has stayed for the period of more than 187 days in India who was also the employee of SCPL, therefore the assessee should have been treated as PE of SCPL