DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND SPONGE AND IRON PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

price, as such, profit on this account was returned in the books of accounts. The assessing officer added 25% of the bogus purchases booked by the assessee but ignored the sales booked to the fictitious parties. Hon'ble Tribunal deleted the addition made on account of bogus purchases on the ground that in case the bogus purchases are disallowed then

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

price, as such, profit on this account was returned in the books of accounts. The assessing officer added 25% of the bogus purchases booked by the assessee but ignored the sales booked to the fictitious parties. Hon'ble Tribunal deleted the addition made on account of bogus purchases on the ground that in case the bogus purchases are disallowed then

GOPAL & SONS HUF,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 32(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

price, as such, profit on this account was returned in the books of accounts. The assessing officer added 25% of the bogus purchases booked by the assessee but ignored the sales booked to the fictitious parties. Hon'ble Tribunal deleted the addition made on account of bogus purchases on the ground that in case the bogus purchases are disallowed then

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND SPONGE AND IRON PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

price, as such, profit on this account\nwas returned in the books of accounts. The assessing officer added 25% of the bogus\npurchases booked by the assessee but ignored the sales booked to the fictitious\nparties. Hon'ble Tribunal deleted the addition made on account of bogus purchases on\nthe ground that in case the bogus purchases are disallowed then

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

price, as such, profit on this account\nwas returned in the books of accounts. The assessing officer added 25% of the bogus\npurchases booked by the assessee but ignored the sales booked to the fictitious\nparties. Hon'ble Tribunal deleted the addition made on account of bogus purchases on\nthe ground that in case the bogus purchases are disallowed then

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND SPONGE AND IRON PRIVATE LIMITED , PATNA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

price, as such, profit on this account\nwas returned in the books of accounts. The assessing officer added 25% of the bogus\npurchases booked by the assessee but ignored the sales booked to the fictitious\nparties. Hon'ble Tribunal deleted the addition made on account of bogus purchases on\nthe ground that in case the bogus purchases are disallowed then

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

price, as such, profit on this account\nwas returned in the books of accounts. The assessing officer added 25% of the bogus\npurchases booked by the assessee but ignored the sales booked to the fictitious\nparties. Hon'ble Tribunal deleted the addition made on account of bogus purchases on\nthe ground that in case the bogus purchases are disallowed then

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

price, as such, profit on this account\nwas returned in the books of accounts. The assessing officer added 25% of the bogus\npurchases booked by the assessee but ignored the sales booked to the fictitious\nparties. Hon'ble Tribunal deleted the addition made on account of bogus purchases on\nthe ground that in case the bogus purchases are disallowed then

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

price, as such, profit on this account\nwas returned in the books of accounts. The assessing officer added 25% of the bogus\npurchases booked by the assessee but ignored the sales booked to the fictitious\nparties. Hon'ble Tribunal deleted the addition made on account of bogus purchases on\nthe ground that in case the bogus purchases are disallowed then

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND LEASE FIN PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

price, as such, profit on this account\nwas returned in the books of accounts. The assessing officer added 25% of the bogus\npurchases booked by the assessee but ignored the sales booked to the fictitious\nparties. Hon'ble Tribunal deleted the addition made on account of bogus purchases on\nthe ground that in case the bogus purchases are disallowed then

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

price, as such, profit on this account\nwas returned in the books of accounts. The assessing officer added 25% of the bogus\npurchases booked by the assessee but ignored the sales booked to the fictitious\nparties. Hon'ble Tribunal deleted the addition made on account of bogus purchases on\nthe ground that in case the bogus purchases are disallowed then

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND SPONGE AND IRON PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

price, as such, profit on this account\nwas returned in the books of accounts. The assessing officer added 25% of the bogus\npurchases booked by the assessee but ignored the sales booked to the fictitious\nparties. Hon'ble Tribunal deleted the addition made on account of bogus purchases on\nthe ground that in case the bogus purchases are disallowed then

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

price, as such, profit on this account\nwas returned in the books of accounts. The assessing officer added 25% of the bogus\npurchases booked by the assessee but ignored the sales booked to the fictitious\nparties. Hon'ble Tribunal deleted the addition made on account of bogus purchases on\nthe ground that in case the bogus purchases are disallowed then

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

price, as such, profit on this account\nwas returned in the books of accounts. The assessing officer added 25% of the bogus\npurchases booked by the assessee but ignored the sales booked to the fictitious\nparties. Hon'ble Tribunal deleted the addition made on account of bogus purchases on\nthe ground that in case the bogus purchases are disallowed then

BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PVT. LTD.,,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

price, as such, profit on this account\nwas returned in the books of accounts. The assessing officer added 25% of the bogus\npurchases booked by the assessee but ignored the sales booked to the fictitious\nparties. Hon'ble Tribunal deleted the addition made on account of bogus purchases on\nthe ground that in case the bogus purchases are disallowed then

D.C.I.T.-CC-2(4), KOLKATA vs. M/S GLOBAL WOOL ALLIANCE PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

purchase from bogus non-existent parties to the tune of Rs. 14,44,089/-. 3 AY: 2005-06 M/s Global Wool Alliance Pvt. Ltd. 4. Issue raised in ground nos. 1 to 4 is in respect of transfer pricing

SMT. SANGITA JHUNJHUNWALA ,HOWRAH vs. ITO, WARD - 47(2), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

Bench: Shri S.S, Godaraassessment Year:2014-15 Smt. Sangita Jhunjhunwala, Income Tax Officer, बनाम / 77/79 Sri Arobinda Road, Ward-47(2), 3, Govt. V/S. Salkia, Howrah-711106 Place (West), Kolkata- [Pan No.Aeypj 0474 M] 700 106 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shri Sanjeev Jhunjhunwala, Income Tax Officer, बनाम / 61 Ashutosh Mukherjee Ward-36(3), Aayakar V/S. Lane, Salkia, Bhawan Poorva, Howrah-711106 Kolkata-700 106 [Pan No.Acppj 8989 E] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shri Sanjeev Jhunjhunwala Income Tax Officer, बनाम / (Huf), 77/79 Sri Arobinda Ward-48(4), 3, Govt. V/S. Road, Salkia, Howrah- Place (West), Kolkata- 711106 700 101 [Pan No.Aaehs 5311 Q] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shri Ashok Jhunjhunwala, Income Tax Officer, बनाम / 109, Netaji Subhas Road, Ward-34(2), Aayakar V/S. Goyee House, Kolkata-001 Bhawan, Poorva, [Pan No.Acppj 8990 D] Kolkata-700 107

transfer of shares in the appellant's name before that date actually on 02.03.2012 whereas the consideration for the alleged purchase was debited from the appellant's bank account on 31.03.2012. The record date for bonus offering was known to the seller and yet even before the receipt of the consideration sum, it parted with the shares knowing very well

SRI SANJEEV JHUNJHUNWALA,HOWRAH vs. ITO, WARD - 36(3), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

Bench: Shri S.S, Godaraassessment Year:2014-15 Smt. Sangita Jhunjhunwala, Income Tax Officer, बनाम / 77/79 Sri Arobinda Road, Ward-47(2), 3, Govt. V/S. Salkia, Howrah-711106 Place (West), Kolkata- [Pan No.Aeypj 0474 M] 700 106 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shri Sanjeev Jhunjhunwala, Income Tax Officer, बनाम / 61 Ashutosh Mukherjee Ward-36(3), Aayakar V/S. Lane, Salkia, Bhawan Poorva, Howrah-711106 Kolkata-700 106 [Pan No.Acppj 8989 E] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shri Sanjeev Jhunjhunwala Income Tax Officer, बनाम / (Huf), 77/79 Sri Arobinda Ward-48(4), 3, Govt. V/S. Road, Salkia, Howrah- Place (West), Kolkata- 711106 700 101 [Pan No.Aaehs 5311 Q] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shri Ashok Jhunjhunwala, Income Tax Officer, बनाम / 109, Netaji Subhas Road, Ward-34(2), Aayakar V/S. Goyee House, Kolkata-001 Bhawan, Poorva, [Pan No.Acppj 8990 D] Kolkata-700 107

transfer of shares in the appellant's name before that date actually on 02.03.2012 whereas the consideration for the alleged purchase was debited from the appellant's bank account on 31.03.2012. The record date for bonus offering was known to the seller and yet even before the receipt of the consideration sum, it parted with the shares knowing very well