BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

48 results for “section 68”+ Section 80Gclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai164Delhi146Bangalore57Kolkata48Ahmedabad46Jaipur42Pune37Chennai36Lucknow22Hyderabad19Chandigarh16Indore11Rajkot8Cuttack6Panaji3Surat3Amritsar3Patna2Visakhapatnam1Jabalpur1Jodhpur1Nagpur1Raipur1Ranchi1SC1Telangana1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 6859Section 80G39Section 14A31Section 143(3)29Addition to Income28Section 271(1)(c)20Deduction20Disallowance18Section 12A17Section 80I

M/S ABHIJEET ENTERPRISE LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 308/KOL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Mar 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 68

68 of the Act and submitted that the phrase ‘any sum credited’ also included book entries & outstanding dues. He submitted that the assessee’s reliance on the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of H.H. Sri Rama Verma vs CIT (supra) was distinguishable since in that decision the provision in question was Section 80G

ITO, WARD - 13(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. GOURI NANDAN REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD.,, HOWRAH

In the result, we uphold the same and dismiss the appeal of the Revenue

ITA 2102/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Nov 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Shri S.S. Godara]

Showing 1–20 of 48 · Page 1 of 3

16
Section 27415
Exemption8
Section 144Section 250Section 56(2)(vii)Section 68Section 80G

80G. Various other decisions as cited in the above submission support the view that sum stands for cash money. Case of Komal Kr. Bader (33 SSOT 58) of ITAT Jaipur Bench interpreting the word sum as used in section 56(2)(vii) has also been relied upon. Case of Jatia Investment Company of Calcutta High Court reported

ITO, WARD - 6(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. DHANKAMAL COMMOSAES PVT. LTD.,, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2089/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Jun 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri Aby T. Varkey) Assessment Year: 2012-13

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

section 68 to make the said addition in the appellant's hand. to make the said addition in the appellant's hand. Transactions purportedly executed by entry o Transactions purportedly executed by entry operators involve perators involve multiple layers and other complexities, introducing delays in multiple layers and other complexities, introducing delays in multiple layers and other complexities, introducing

ITO, WARD - 1(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. JOSAN DEPOSITS & ADVANCES PVT. LTD., , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2096/KOL/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Dec 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap, Vice- & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 133(6)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263Section 68

68, Section 56, Section 80G, Section 88 and various other section which were relevant for the purpose

M/S. ACCESS GLOBAL LIMITED ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

ITA 13/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Apr 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey, J.M. & Dr.A.L.Saini, A.M.)

For Appellant: Shri S. M Surana, Advocate, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, CIT, ld.Sr.DR
Section 144(1)Section 68

section 68 to make the said addition in the appellant’s hand. Transactions purportedly executed by entry operators involve multiple layers and other complexities, introducing delays in introduction of unaccounted cash/money and multiple players being incorporated entities. Measures taken by the AO in the course of the assessment proceeding falls much short of what is required to be done

M/S. MOHANLAL MAHENDRA KUMAR PATNI CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1463/KOL/2017[--------------]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Jul 2018

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 1463/Kol/2017 Assessment Years : 2016-17 M/S Mohanlal Mahendra Kumar Patni. -Vs- Cit(E), Kolkata [Pan: Aaatm 8500 F ] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri S. M. Surana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Tiwari, CIT
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

80G – Deduction in respect of donations to certain funds, charitable institutions, etc. …………… (5) This section applies to donations to any institution or fund referred to in sub-clause (iv) of clause (a) of sub-section (2), only if it is established in India for a charitable purpose and if it fulfils the following conditions, namely :— 53[(i) where

ITO, WARD-46(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. ANUPAM NANDI, HOWRAH

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 774/KOL/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Dec 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri Aby T.Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No.774/Kol/2012 Assessment Year : 2007-08 I.T.O., Ward-46(1) -Vs.- Shri Anupam Nandi Kolkata Kolkata [Pan : Abipn 4303 N] (Appellant) (Respondent) For The Appellant : Md.Ghayas Uddin, Jcit,Sr.Dr For The Respondent : Shri Miraj D.Shah, Ar

For Appellant: Md.Ghayas Uddin, JCIT,Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri Miraj D.Shah, AR
Section 28

section 68 of the Act. It is well settled by the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in 187 ITR 308 (SC) relied upon by the ld AR that the expression ‘sum’ means ‘sum of money’ only . Though this decision was rendered in the context of ITA No.774/Kol/2012 Shri Anupam Nandi A.Y.2007-08 16 applicability of deduction u/s 80G

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - VII, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. THE HOOGHLY MILLS CO. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 601/KOL/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Apr 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri S.Jhajharia, FCA &For Respondent: Shri Ashok Kumar, Addl.CIT, Sr.DR
Section 40A(7)(b)

80G in accordance with law. The same is accordingly upheld and ground no.2 of the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed. 2. C.O. 32/Kol/2011 11. The cross objection filed by the assessee in C.O. 32/Kol/2011 was not pressed at the time of hearing. Hence, the same is dismissed as not pressed. 3. 12. ITA No.746/Kol/2011 is the appeal by the Revenue

ITO, WARD-13(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S ANAND ENTERPRISES LTD., HOWRAH

In the result, the appeal of the revenue and the cross objection of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1614/KOL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Sept 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri M.Balaganesh, Am & Hon’Ble Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A No. 1614/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2012-13 Ito, Ward-13(1), Kolkata -Vs- M/S Anand Enterprises Ltd. [Pan: Aacca 1175 F] (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No. 56/Kol/2016 (Arising Out Of I.T.A No. 1614/Kol/2017 ) Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/S Anand Enterprises Ltd. -Vs- Ito, Ward-13(1), Kolkata [Pan: Aacca 1175 F] (Cross Objector) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.Hangshing, CIT DRFor Respondent: Shri S.M. Surana, Ld. AR
Section 131Section 133(6)Section 2Section 68

section 68 to make the said addition in the appellant’s hand. Transactions purportedly executed by entry operators involve multiple layers and other complexities, introducing delays in introduction of unaccounted cash/money and multiple players being incorporated entities. Measures taken by the AO in the course of the assessment proceeding falls much short of what is required to be done

ITO, WARD - 1(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. KANER INVESTMENTS LTD.,, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2095/KOL/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Jan 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.2095/Kol/2017 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Ajoy Kr. Singh, CITFor Respondent: S.M. Surana, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 68

section 68 to make the said addition in the appellant's hand. Transactions purportedly executed by entry operators involve multiple layers and other complexities, introducing delays in introduction of unaccounted cash/money and multiple players being incorporated entities. Measures taken by the AO in the course of the assessment proceeding falls much short of what is required to be done

M/S. ABA EARTHLINE COMMUNICATION LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-1(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1141/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/S. Aba Earthline Communications Ltd...........…………..……………….…...……..….…….....Appellant Rajesh Mohan & Associates Unit No. 18 5Th Floor Bagati House 34, Ganesh Chandra Avenue Kolkata – 700 013 [Pan : Aabck 4264 E] Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(4), Kolkata.……......……….………………..………….…...........Respondent

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

section 68 to make the said addition in the appellant's hand. Transactions purportedly executed by entry operators involve multiple layers and other complexities, introducing delays in introduction of unaccounted cash/money and multiple players being incorporated entities. Measures taken by the AO in the course of the assessment proceeding falls much short of what is required to be done

I.T.O.,WARD-1(3), KOLKATA vs. M/S TRILOKPATI EXIM PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 477/KOL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Sept 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.477/Kol/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2012-13)

For Appellant: Shri Ram Bilash Meena, CITFor Respondent: ShriVinod Kr. Jain, FCA
Section 143(3)Section 68

section 68 to make the said addition in the appellant’s hand. Transactions purportedly executed by entry operators involve multiple layers and other complexities, introducing delays in introduction of unaccounted cash/money and multiple players being incorporated entities. Measures taken by the AO in the course of the assessment proceeding falls much short of what is required to be done

ITO, WD-5(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. VISHWADHAM TRADERS PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 803/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Jan 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey, J.M. & Dr.A.L.Saini, A.M.) Asstt. Year : 2012-13 I.T.O. Ward 5(4), Kolkata Vs M/S. Vishwadham Traders P.Ltd Pan:Aascv 8983D (Appellant/Assessee) (Respondent/Department)

For Appellant: Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT, ld.DRFor Respondent: Shri Miraj D.Shah, ld.AR
Section 143(3)Section 68Section 80G

section 68 to make the said addition in the appellant's hand. Transactions purportedly executed by entry operators involve multiple layers and other complexities, introducing delays in introduction of unaccounted cash/money and multiple players being incorporated entities. Measures taken by the AO in the course of the assessment proceeding falls much short of what is required to be done

PCBL LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 11(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2034/KOL/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 35Section 35(2)(ab)Section 37Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

68,57,615/- on account of ICDS adjustment. iii) Addition of Rs. 26,23,800/- disallowance u/s 14A of the Act. iv) Addition of Rs. 3,24,18,037/- u/s 35(2)(ab) of the Act. v) Addition of Rs. 1,10,55,000/- deduction u/s Chapter VIA i.e. 80G vi) Addition of Rs. 2,01,35,978/- by declining

PRAMOD LAKRA, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILLIPS CARBON BLACK LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2458/KOL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 35Section 35(2)(ab)Section 37Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

68,57,615/- on account of ICDS adjustment. iii) Addition of Rs. 26,23,800/- disallowance u/s 14A of the Act. iv) Addition of Rs. 3,24,18,037/- u/s 35(2)(ab) of the Act. v) Addition of Rs. 1,10,55,000/- deduction u/s Chapter VIA i.e. 80G vi) Addition of Rs. 2,01,35,978/- by declining

PRAMOD LAKRA,DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILLIPS CARBON BLACK LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2457/KOL/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 35Section 35(2)(ab)Section 37Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

68,57,615/- on account of ICDS adjustment. iii) Addition of Rs. 26,23,800/- disallowance u/s 14A of the Act. iv) Addition of Rs. 3,24,18,037/- u/s 35(2)(ab) of the Act. v) Addition of Rs. 1,10,55,000/- deduction u/s Chapter VIA i.e. 80G vi) Addition of Rs. 2,01,35,978/- by declining

PRAMOD LAKRA, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILLIPS CARBON BLACK LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2456/KOL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 35Section 35(2)(ab)Section 37Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

68,57,615/- on account of ICDS adjustment. iii) Addition of Rs. 26,23,800/- disallowance u/s 14A of the Act. iv) Addition of Rs. 3,24,18,037/- u/s 35(2)(ab) of the Act. v) Addition of Rs. 1,10,55,000/- deduction u/s Chapter VIA i.e. 80G vi) Addition of Rs. 2,01,35,978/- by declining

PRAMOD LAKRA,DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILIPS CARBON BLACK LTD , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2459/KOL/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 35Section 35(2)(ab)Section 37Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

68,57,615/- on account of ICDS adjustment. iii) Addition of Rs. 26,23,800/- disallowance u/s 14A of the Act. iv) Addition of Rs. 3,24,18,037/- u/s 35(2)(ab) of the Act. v) Addition of Rs. 1,10,55,000/- deduction u/s Chapter VIA i.e. 80G vi) Addition of Rs. 2,01,35,978/- by declining

SHREE AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LTD. ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee for AY 2012-13 is allowed and appeal for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed

ITA 182/KOL/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate&Ms. PujaFor Respondent: Shri P. P. Barman, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40A(2)Section 68

68 amounting to Rs.4,12,50,000/-. in the remand report, Ld. AO has accepted the submissions of the assessee except for a sum of Rs.4,33,900/- by stating that no explanation was furnished in this respect. For the balance amount, Ld. AO has accepted the claim of the assessee. We are in agreement with the findings given

SHREE AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-10. , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee for AY 2012-13 is allowed and appeal for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed

ITA 183/KOL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate&Ms. PujaFor Respondent: Shri P. P. Barman, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40A(2)Section 68

68 amounting to Rs.4,12,50,000/-. in the remand report, Ld. AO has accepted the submissions of the assessee except for a sum of Rs.4,33,900/- by stating that no explanation was furnished in this respect. For the balance amount, Ld. AO has accepted the claim of the assessee. We are in agreement with the findings given