Search: section 68

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 44Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi45 Mumbai19 Dehradun13 Chandigarh8 Guwahati8 Kolkata4 Bangalore3 Lucknow2 Surat1 Chennai1 Indore1 Jaipur1 Karnataka1 Nagpur1 SC1 Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Addition to Income4 Section 69C3 Reassessment3

I.T.O WD - 1(1),ASANSOL, ASANSOL vs. M/S EAST INDIA MINING & POWER ASSOCIATES, PURULIA

In the result, assessee’s CO is partly allowed

ITA 2520/KOL/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Aug 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 69C

68,126/- from M/s Patesaria Brothers. The assessee has shown outstanding balance at the year- end against the above stated party for an amount of ₹13,57,226/-. During the course of assessment proceedings, AO on confirmation from the party M/s Patesaria Brothers found that there was a cash payment made to ITA No.2520 & CO 155/Kol/2013 A.Y.2010-11

ADIT(IT)-3(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. THE TIMKEN COMPANY, KOLKATA

In the result appeals for AY 2004-05 to 2007-08 are allowed

ITA 387/KOL/2010[2002-03]Status: Disposed

I.T.O WD - 1(1),ASANSOL, ASANSOL vs. M/S EAST INDIA MINING & POWER ASSOCIATES, PURULIA

ADIT(IT)-3(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. THE TIMKEN COMPANY, KOLKATA

I.T.O WD - 1(1),ASANSOL, ASANSOL vs. M/S EAST INDIA MINING & POWER ASSOCIATES, PURULIA

ADIT(IT)-3(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. THE TIMKEN COMPANY, KOLKATA

THE TIMKEN COMPANY,KOLKATA vs. THE DDIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION - 3(1),KOLKATA, KOLKATA

THE TIMKEN COMPANY,KOLKATA vs. A.D.I.T (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) - II,KOLKATA, KOLKATA