BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “section 68”+ Section 44Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai29Delhi19Chennai8Dehradun6Kolkata5Hyderabad5Patna2Jaipur1Chandigarh1Jodhpur1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 25032Section 271A24Section 271B16Section 143(3)9Penalty5Addition to Income5Natural Justice4

SARASWATI GUPTA,HOWRAH vs. I.T.O., WARD - 47(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 86/KOL/2023[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Aug 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos. 86 & 87/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2011-2012 & I.T.A. Nos. 88 & 89/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-2013 Saraswati Gupta,..................................Appellant Radha Kunj, 4D, 181, Dharamtalla Road, Salkia, Howrah-711106 [Pan: Adapg1993M] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,...............................Respondent Ward-47(1), Kolkata, 3, Government Place (West), Kolkata-700001 Appearances By: Shri Chirag Desai, Office Staff On Behalf Of Shri Miraj D. Shah,A.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Prabhakar Prakash Ranjan, Jcit, Sr. D.R.,Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : June 22, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : August 04, 2023 O R D E R

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271ASection 271B

68 of the Act cannot be invoked. 12. We notice that recently similar issue came for adjudication before the Coordinate Bench Ranchi in the case of Rakesh Kumar Jha –vs.- ITO (2023) 150 taxmann.com 298 and this Tribunal after considering the judicial precedence on this issue has decided it against the assessee holding that in case of not maintaining books

SARASWATI GUPTA,HOWRAH vs. I.T.O., WARD - 47(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 88/KOL/2023[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Aug 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos. 86 & 87/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2011-2012 & I.T.A. Nos. 88 & 89/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-2013 Saraswati Gupta,..................................Appellant Radha Kunj, 4D, 181, Dharamtalla Road, Salkia, Howrah-711106 [Pan: Adapg1993M] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,...............................Respondent Ward-47(1), Kolkata, 3, Government Place (West), Kolkata-700001 Appearances By: Shri Chirag Desai, Office Staff On Behalf Of Shri Miraj D. Shah,A.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Prabhakar Prakash Ranjan, Jcit, Sr. D.R.,Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : June 22, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : August 04, 2023 O R D E R

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271ASection 271B

68 of the Act cannot be invoked. 12. We notice that recently similar issue came for adjudication before the Coordinate Bench Ranchi in the case of Rakesh Kumar Jha –vs.- ITO (2023) 150 taxmann.com 298 and this Tribunal after considering the judicial precedence on this issue has decided it against the assessee holding that in case of not maintaining books

SARASWATI GUPTA,HOWRAH vs. I.T.O., WARD - 47(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 87/KOL/2023[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Aug 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos. 86 & 87/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2011-2012 & I.T.A. Nos. 88 & 89/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-2013 Saraswati Gupta,..................................Appellant Radha Kunj, 4D, 181, Dharamtalla Road, Salkia, Howrah-711106 [Pan: Adapg1993M] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,...............................Respondent Ward-47(1), Kolkata, 3, Government Place (West), Kolkata-700001 Appearances By: Shri Chirag Desai, Office Staff On Behalf Of Shri Miraj D. Shah,A.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Prabhakar Prakash Ranjan, Jcit, Sr. D.R.,Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : June 22, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : August 04, 2023 O R D E R

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271ASection 271B

68 of the Act cannot be invoked. 12. We notice that recently similar issue came for adjudication before the Coordinate Bench Ranchi in the case of Rakesh Kumar Jha –vs.- ITO (2023) 150 taxmann.com 298 and this Tribunal after considering the judicial precedence on this issue has decided it against the assessee holding that in case of not maintaining books

SARASWATI GUPTA,HOWRAH vs. I.T.O., WARD - 47(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 89/KOL/2023[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Aug 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos. 86 & 87/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2011-2012 & I.T.A. Nos. 88 & 89/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-2013 Saraswati Gupta,..................................Appellant Radha Kunj, 4D, 181, Dharamtalla Road, Salkia, Howrah-711106 [Pan: Adapg1993M] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,...............................Respondent Ward-47(1), Kolkata, 3, Government Place (West), Kolkata-700001 Appearances By: Shri Chirag Desai, Office Staff On Behalf Of Shri Miraj D. Shah,A.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Prabhakar Prakash Ranjan, Jcit, Sr. D.R.,Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : June 22, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : August 04, 2023 O R D E R

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271ASection 271B

68 of the Act cannot be invoked. 12. We notice that recently similar issue came for adjudication before the Coordinate Bench Ranchi in the case of Rakesh Kumar Jha –vs.- ITO (2023) 150 taxmann.com 298 and this Tribunal after considering the judicial precedence on this issue has decided it against the assessee holding that in case of not maintaining books

JCIT, (OSD), CIR-2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S WEST BENGAL TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., KOLKATA

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 636/KOL/2016[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 May 2018AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2009-10 Jcit(Osd), Circle-2(2), V/S. M/S West Bengal Tourism Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Development Corporation Chowringhee Sqr. Ltd., 12, Hemanta Bhawan, 4Th Floor, B.B.D. Kolkta-69 Bag East, Kolkata- 001 [Pan No.Aaacw 3093 Q] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri S. Dasgupta, Addl. Cit-Dr अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri G.R. Saha, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 16-05-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 24-05-2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S.Godara:- This Revenue’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2009-10 Arises Against Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Kolkata’S Order Dated 22.01.201, Passed In Appeal No.406/Cit(A)-10/Cir.2/2014-15/Kol, In Proceedings U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short As ‘The Act’.

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 277Section 44A

section 68, it would not be out of place to mention that one has to keep in mind the legal maxim lex non cogitad impossibila which means the law does not compel any person to do that which he cannot possibly perform. It is abundantly clear that the AO did not try to make any efforts to check