BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “section 68”+ Section 36Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Ahmedabad45Mumbai8Kolkata5Delhi4Hyderabad3Jaipur3Pune3Telangana2Amritsar2Karnataka2Jodhpur1SC1Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 807Section 406Section 143(3)5Section 14A5Section 2634Section 153A4Section 1484Section 194C3Natural Justice2Disallowance

JHV CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., CC - 2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed but the order of the Pr

ITA 1289/KOL/2024[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Feb 2026AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 2(22)(e)Section 263Section 68

68 of the IT Act, 1961 and under section 69C of Income-tax Act, 1961 respectively. Hence, amount of Rs. 39,59,000/- (Rs. 37,00,000/- + Rs. 2,59,000/-) is added back to the total income of the assessee. [ADDITION :- Rs 39,59,000/-]” 3.1 Subsequently, the Ld. Pr. CIT observed on examination of documents that

2

SUNITA GARG,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 43(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1382/KOL/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Feb 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Sanjay Awasthii.T.A. No. 1382/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2011-2012 Sunita Garg,……………………….…..…………Appellant 36A, Sahitya Parishad Street, Kolkata-700006 [Pan:Adspg1683J] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,…………………………....Respondent Ward-43(1), Kolkata, 3, Government Place (West), Kolkata-700001 Appearances By: Shri A.K. Tibrewal, Fca & Shri Saurabh Gupta, Fca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri P.N. Barnwal, Cit, D.R. & Smt. Ranu Biswas, Sr. D.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: January 28, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: February 26, 2025 O R D E R

Section 143(2)Section 144Section 148Section 68

section 68 of the Act and dismissed the appeal of the assessee. 4. On being aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Tribunal. 5. We have heard both the sides. It was the submission of the ld. Counsel for the assessee that the assessee had made her submissions before the ld. Commissioner (Appeals), but the ld. CIT(Appeals

WEST BENGAL INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR.-6(2), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 564/KOL/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Jul 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 10(34)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 14A

36A, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Kolkata-700001 [PAN:AAACW3432D] -Vs.- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,...........................................Respondent Circle-6(2), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan, 6th Floor, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata-700069 Appearances by: Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Counsel & Shri Ananda Sen, Advocate, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Sudipta Guha, CIT(DR), appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding

D.C.I.T CC - XXVIII,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S SPML INFRA LTD (ERSTWHILE M/S SUBHAS PROJECTS& MARKETING LTD), KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 1291/KOL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Aug 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 80Section 80l

sections, plans, architectural, structural drawings and all working drawings, for approval. (para 9.2) ITA No.1291-1292/Kol/2013 A.Ys 06-07 & 09-10 DCIT CC-XXVIII, Kol. v. M/S SPML Infra Ltd Page 7 (ii) Materials: All the material required for the work was to be provided by the assessee. (page 39, para 10) (iii) Labour: The assessee was required to employ

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-36(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S SAHA AGENCY, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of revenue is partly allowed and the Cross Objection of assessee is dismissed

ITA 2453/KOL/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 May 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Respondent: Md. Ghayas Uddin Ansari, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 40

section 194C of the Act could not be made applicable to the facts of 5 ITA No.2453/K/2013 & CO No.139/K/2013 M/s. Saha Agency, AY 2010-11 this case. We find that the Learned DR was not able to advance any specific arguments before us against the order of Ld. CIT(A). Hence, the ground no. 1 of revenue appeal