BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

145 results for “section 68”+ Section 36(1)(va)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi250Mumbai161Kolkata145Ahmedabad135Jaipur76Agra63Chennai60Bangalore48Chandigarh42Hyderabad29Raipur26Pune24Indore23Guwahati22Surat10Varanasi10Rajkot10Visakhapatnam9Lucknow9Jodhpur8Cuttack7Cochin6Allahabad5Telangana4Karnataka3SC2Dehradun2Amritsar2Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(va)213Section 2(24)(x)116Section 43B108Section 13983Disallowance81Addition to Income74Deduction54Section 139(1)50Section 143(3)26Section 14A

DALMIA LAMINATORS LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR. 7(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 106/KOL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Aug 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 143(3)Section 2(24)Section 250Section 3Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(iv)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43BSection 68

68 of the I.T. Act. iii. That the appellant craves leave to add/or amend any ground of this appeal.” 2. Brief facts of the case are that the ld. AO framed the assessment order u/s 143(3) vide order dated 14.12.2019 for the A.Y. 2017-18 of the Act. The assessee in its return of income disclosing total income

Showing 1–20 of 145 · Page 1 of 8

...
26
Section 25024
Limitation/Time-bar11

M/S PREMIER IRRIGATION ADRITEC (P) LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR-11(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 387/KOL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 2(24)Section 250Section 3Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

36(1)(va) to deposit the amounts retained by it or deducted by it from the employee's income, unless the condition that it is deposited on or before the due date, is correct and justified. The non-obstante clause has to be understood in the context of the entire provision of Section 43B which is to ensure timely

M/S SHRISTI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-11(2), KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1228/KOL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Oct 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal]

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 2(24)Section 3Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,95,685/- was claimed. Assessment proceedings were completed wherein ld.A.O made disallowance of Rs. 4,22,409/- u/s 36(1)(va) in respect of employees’ contribution to provident fund and ESI which was deposited to the Govt. Account beyond the prescribed due date. Further, disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(iii) was made of Rs. 1

JANGLOOS CHANDAK CREATION PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR. 11(1), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 495/KOL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Girish Agrawal, Am]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583/- being employers' contribution under Section 43B of the Act. CIT(A) deleted

JANGLOOS CHANDAK CREATION PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR. 11(1), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 494/KOL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Apr 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Girish Agrawal, Am]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583/- being employers' contribution under Section 43B of the Act. CIT(A) deleted

PNP ENGINEERING WORKS (P) LTD, PURBA MEDINIPUR vs. A C OF INCOME TAX CIR. 27(1) , HALDIA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 334/KOL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Mar 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am ]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583/- being employers' contribution under Section 43B of the Act. CIT(A) deleted

PNP ENGINEERING WORKS (P) LTD, PURBA MEDINIPUR vs. A C OF INCOME TAX CIR. 27(1) , HALDIA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 333/KOL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am ]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583/- being employers' contribution under Section 43B of the Act. CIT(A) deleted

PNP ENGINEERING WORKS (P) LTD, PURBA MEDINIPUR vs. A C OF INCOME TAX CIR. 27(1) , HALDIA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 332/KOL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Mar 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am ]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583/- being employers' contribution under Section 43B of the Act. CIT(A) deleted

DESANA POLY PLASTIC INDUSTRIES,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR. 34, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 452/KOL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Feb 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am ]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583/- being employers' contribution under Section 43B of the Act. CIT(A) deleted

MD. MUJIBUR RAHAMAN,DURGAPUR vs. ACIT, CIR. 2, DURGAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 381/KOL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Feb 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am ]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583/- being employers' contribution under Section 43B of the Act. CIT(A) deleted

MICROVIEWS INFOSYSTEMS PVT. LTD,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, C.P.C., BANGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 295/KOL/2021[2018-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Feb 2022AY 2018-18

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583/- being employers' contribution under Section 43B of the Act. CIT(A) deleted

FLOWLINE SERVICES PVT LTD,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-12(2), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 267/KOL/2021[2016-17]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata23 Feb 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583/- being employers' contribution under Section 43B of the Act. CIT(A) deleted

KANCHAN METALS PVT. LTD,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR. 8(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 309/KOL/2021[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata23 Feb 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583/- being employers' contribution under Section 43B of the Act. CIT(A) deleted

TRIDENT SECURITY AND ALLIED SERVICES PVT. LTD,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 2(4), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 303/KOL/2021[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata23 Feb 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583/- being employers' contribution under Section 43B of the Act. CIT(A) deleted

VICTORY SURVEILLIANCE & ESCORTS (P) LTD,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 162/KOL/2021[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata23 Feb 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583/- being employers' contribution under Section 43B of the Act. CIT(A) deleted

TRIDENT SECURITY AND ALLIED SERVICES PVT. LTD,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 2(4), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 302/KOL/2021[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata23 Feb 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583/- being employers' contribution under Section 43B of the Act. CIT(A) deleted

M/S JAIKISHANDASS MALL JUTE PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. CPC, , BANGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 342/KOL/2021[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata21 Feb 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583/- being employers' contribution under Section 43B of the Act. CIT(A) deleted

RAGHVENDRA PRATAP SINGH,KOLKATA vs. DCIT,CPC, BANGAORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 556/KOL/2021[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata18 Feb 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey & Shri Rajesh Kumar] I.T.A. No. 556/Kol/2021 Assessment Years: 2019-20 Raghvendra Pratap Singh Vs. Dcit (Cpc) Bangalore (Pan: Amaps3456L) Appellant Respondent

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583/- being employers' contribution under Section 43B of the Act. CIT(A) deleted

BOROJALINGAH TEA COMPA NY ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-34(1), KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 465/KOL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Feb 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey] I.T.A. No. 465/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Borojalingah Tea Company Vs. Ito, Ward-34(1), Kolkata (Pan: Aacfb7772N) Appellant Respondent

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583/- being employers' contribution under Section 43B of the Act. CIT(A) deleted

HINDUSTAN FIBRE GLASS WORKS,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 608/KOL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Feb 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey & Shri Rajesh Kumar] I.T.A. No. 608/Kol/2021 Assessment Years: 2018-19 Hindustan Fibre Glass Works Vs. Dcit, Cpc, Bengaluru (Pan: Aabfh6597G) Appellant Respondent

Section 139Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583/- being employers' contribution under Section 43B of the Act. CIT(A) deleted