BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “section 68”+ Section 28Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi52Mumbai27Telangana26Chandigarh18Chennai16Bangalore13Kolkata10Jaipur4Varanasi4Ahmedabad2Orissa2Rajkot2SC2Raipur1Rajasthan1Hyderabad1Karnataka1Jodhpur1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 4016Addition to Income9Section 2638Section 143(3)7Disallowance7Section 80I6Deduction6Section 1955Section 25Section 36(1)(va)

EXIMCORP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED. ,KOLKATA vs. ACIT,CIR-5(2),KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 701/KOL/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 115JSection 195Section 195(1)Section 2Section 40

68,246/-debited in the P/L account of the appellant, by wrongfully invoking Section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"). 2. FOR THAT, the CIT(A) failed to appreciate that there is no obligation upon the appellant to deduct tax at source (TDS) under Section 195(1) of the Act against the amount

EXIMCORP INDIA (P) LTD. ,KOLKATA vs. ACIT,CIR-5(2),KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

5
TDS5
Section 115J4
ITA 702/KOL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Aug 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 115JSection 195Section 195(1)Section 2Section 40

68,246/-debited in the P/L account of the appellant, by wrongfully invoking Section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"). 2. FOR THAT, the CIT(A) failed to appreciate that there is no obligation upon the appellant to deduct tax at source (TDS) under Section 195(1) of the Act against the amount

KUNDU BROTHERS,SILIGURI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 2, SILIGURI, SILIGURI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1569/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 May 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap

Section 194ASection 2Section 40Section 68

28A) for the purpose of deduction of tax at source as prescribed under section 194A. Respectfully following the said decision of the Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal, I hold that the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source from the interest paid on the delayed payments to trade creditors and the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer

M/S PREMIER IRRIGATION ADRITEC (P) LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR-11(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 387/KOL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 2(24)Section 250Section 3Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68 of the Paper Book. – Kindlysee Para 10 onwards of the Judgement at Pages 63 to 66 of the Paper Book. Pleasesee Para 10 wherein the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court referred to the Judgement ofApex Court in the case of HarshadShantilal Mehta and held that tax does not includeInterest or penalty. 4.4 Now, I refer to the Judgement

M/S STANDARD FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR.7(2), KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 178/KOL/2021[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata08 Jan 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajesh Kumar & Sonjoy Sarma

Section 194ASection 2Section 40

Section 2(28A) of the Act and therefore, the AO distinguished the case laws relied by the assessee. Finally, the AO observed that TDS has not been deducted on the interest on Page 2 of 7 I.T.A. No.: 178/KOL/2021 Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/s. Standard Financial Consultants Private Limited. delayed payments and therefore, 30% of the interest payments

DCIT, CIR-10(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S CHAMPION COMMERCIAL CO. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands dismissed

ITA 1421/KOL/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Apr 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2013-14 Dcit, Circle-10(1), V/S. M/S Champion P-7, Chowringhee Commercial Co. Ltd., Square, 3Rd Floor, P-15, Cit Road, Kolkata-69 Kolkata-73 [Pan No.Aabcc 2373 G] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. Cit-Sr-Dr अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri Manoj Kataruka, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 26-02-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 27-04-2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per Waseem Ahmed:- This Appeal By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Kolkata Dated 04.04.2016. Assessment Was Framed By Dcit, Circle-10(1), Kolkata U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) Vide His Order Dated 10.02.2016 For Assessment Year 2013-14. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds:- “I. That On The Facts Of The Case Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Deleting The Addition Of Rs.2,50,938/- On A Wrong Appreciation Of Facts Ignoring The Provisions Of Section 37(1) Overrule The Judicial Pronouncement Of Cit Vs. Calcutta Agency Limited (1951) (191) Itr (Sc) Ii. That On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Deleting The Addition Of Rs.13,91,404/- On A Wrong Appreciation Of Facts Ignoring The Provisions Of Section 37 Of The It Act, 1961. Iii. That On The Facts Of The Case Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Deleting The Addition Of Rs.20,25,329/- On Wrong Appreciation Of Facts Ignoring The

Section 14Section 143(3)Section 194JSection 195Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 37Section 37(1)Section 44A

68,90,871/- aggregating to total of ₹1,41,16,439/-.The investments in shares, debentures as on 31.3.2013 was ₹5,59,44,974/- and as on 31.3.2012 was ₹6,06,58,124/-. In view of the settled position of law where the appellant was having sufficient capital it shall be presumed that the investments have been made from

M/S ADHUNIK INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. JCIT, RG-10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1281/KOL/2015[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 May 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri A.T.Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No.1281 /Kol/2015 Assessment Year : 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D.Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT, Sr.Dr
Section 143(3)Section 80I

68[ 2011];] 69[ 69a [(vi ) any undertaking carrying on the business of laying and operating a cross-country natural gas distribution network, including pipelines and storage facilities being an integral part of such network, which fulfils the following conditions, namely:— (a ) it is owned by a company registered in India or by a consortium of such companies

D.C.I.T CIR - 3,KOLATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S MANTORA OIL PRODUCTS LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 2252/KOL/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Mar 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 263Section 40A(2)

28A, Gariahat Road, Aayakar Bhawan, Kolkata-700 029 [PAN No.AACCA 3710C] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri D.S.Dmle, AR & अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri Akal Dhudwala, AR Shri Niraj Kumar, CIT-DR ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 09-03-2016 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 21-03-2016 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश

ANJALI JEWELLERS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. CIT, KOLKATA-IV, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 2252/KOL/2014[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Mar 2016AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 263Section 40A(2)

28A, Gariahat Road, Aayakar Bhawan, Kolkata-700 029 [PAN No.AACCA 3710C] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri D.S.Dmle, AR & अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri Akal Dhudwala, AR Shri Niraj Kumar, CIT-DR ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 09-03-2016 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 21-03-2016 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश

I.T.O WD - 7(3),KOLKATA., KOLKATA vs. M/S SHREE BANKE BEHARI ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 350/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Aug 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2009-10

Section 143(3)Section 145

section 145 of the IT Act, 1961 and deleted the addition of Rs.30,37,993/- under the head “Undisclosed Sales” holding that the calculation of valuation of closing stock is not done properly by the Assessing Officer as well as arbitrarily held that the assessee has shown the value of closing stock at a price more than average cost