BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “section 68”+ Section 271Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur39Mumbai26Delhi26Karnataka21Chennai21Hyderabad16Ahmedabad15Indore12Pune11Kolkata9Agra8Surat7Bangalore6Rajkot4Ranchi3Jabalpur2Nagpur2Cuttack2Visakhapatnam1Cochin1Amritsar1SC1

Key Topics

Section 14720Section 143(3)15Section 14810Section 269S8Section 271E7Section 133A6Section 143(2)6Section 269T6Survey u/s 133A6Limitation/Time-bar

BINOD KUMAR AGARWAL.,UTTAR DINAJPUR vs. J.C.I.T RANGE - 2,JALPAIGURI, JALPAIGURI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed as stated above

ITA 237/KOL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Feb 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Rajeev Kumar, FCA, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri G. Mallikarjun, CIT, ld.DR
Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 271Section 271DSection 271E

section 269SS and 269T respectively. The ld. JCIT ignoring the submissions of the assessee proposed to levy the impugned penalties u/s. 271D and 271E of the Act amounting to Rs. 4,68

6
Condonation of Delay6
Reopening of Assessment5

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. MURLIDHAR RATANLAL EXPORTS LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the\nCOs of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2178/KOL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Oct 2025AY 2013-14
Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

sections": [ "147", "148", "133A", "143(3)", "139(1)", "68", "133(6)", "271D", "271E", "69C" ], "issues": "The main issues involved

M/S. SHREE SHANKAR SERVICE STATION. ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-49(1), KOL, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 594/KOL/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Dec 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 133(6)Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 269TSection 27I

Section 269T of the Act and therefore, initiated penalty proceedings 271E of the Act. Page 3 of 8 I.T.A. No.: 594/KOL/2023 Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/s. Shree Shankar Service Station. 5. During the course of penalty proceedings when the assessee was confronted with the alleged repayment of unsecured loan in cash, it was stated by the assessee that

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. MURLIDHAR RATANLAL EXPORTS LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the COs of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2187/KOL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Tulsyan &For Respondent: Shri Sallong Yaden, DR
Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Section 68 of the Act, three ingredients were necessary. Firstly, identity of the parties to the transaction of loan, second is the creditworthiness of such parties and thirdly the genuineness of the transaction. It was submitted in vain that neither of the ingredients were satisfied. 5. As discussed above, since the requisite material was furnished by assessee showing

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. MURLIDHAR RATANLAL EXPORTS LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the COs of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2179/KOL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Tulsyan &For Respondent: Shri Sallong Yaden, DR
Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Section 68 of the Act, three ingredients were necessary. Firstly, identity of the parties to the transaction of loan, second is the creditworthiness of such parties and thirdly the genuineness of the transaction. It was submitted in vain that neither of the ingredients were satisfied. 5. As discussed above, since the requisite material was furnished by assessee showing

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1 4 KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. MURLIDHAR RATANLAL EXPORTS LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the COs of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2245/KOL/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Tulsyan &For Respondent: Shri Sallong Yaden, DR
Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Section 68 of the Act, three ingredients were necessary. Firstly, identity of the parties to the transaction of loan, second is the creditworthiness of such parties and thirdly the genuineness of the transaction. It was submitted in vain that neither of the ingredients were satisfied. 5. As discussed above, since the requisite material was furnished by assessee showing

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. MURLIDHAR RATANLAL EXPORTS LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the COs of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2196/KOL/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Tulsyan &For Respondent: Shri Sallong Yaden, DR
Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Section 68 of the Act, three ingredients were necessary. Firstly, identity of the parties to the transaction of loan, second is the creditworthiness of such parties and thirdly the genuineness of the transaction. It was submitted in vain that neither of the ingredients were satisfied. 5. As discussed above, since the requisite material was furnished by assessee showing

RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA,KOLKATA vs. ACIT,CIR-47,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1340/KOL/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Apr 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Kumar Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rakesh Kumar Das, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 269SSection 68

68 of the Act. In the same assessment he also initiated the penalty proceedings u/s. 271D and 271E of the Act for violation of provisions of section

M/S ARKIT VINCOM PVT. LTD,KOLKATA vs. ADDL. CIT RANGE 9, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2397/KOL/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Mar 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 2397/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2008-09 M/S Arkit Vincom Pvt. Ltd. -Vs- Acit, Range-9, Kolkata [Pan: Aacca 3907 B] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Arvind Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Arindam Bhattacharjee, Addl. CIT
Section 269TSection 271E

271E of the Act alone. Even assuming that the receipt of share capital with premium of Rs 90 per share is not genuine, still the revenue had not taken any action on the assessee to treat the same as unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act. The powers of the ld CITA are co-terminus with that