BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “section 68”+ Section 271Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai56Jaipur32Mumbai27Karnataka21Kolkata12Ahmedabad9Hyderabad7Delhi6Bangalore6Indore4Pune3Varanasi2Chandigarh2Rajkot2SC2Jodhpur1Calcutta1Nagpur1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 271B42Section 25034Section 271A28Section 44A12Penalty11Section 14710Section 143(3)10Addition to Income7Section 139(1)4Section 143(1)

SARASWATI GUPTA,HOWRAH vs. I.T.O., WARD - 47(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 86/KOL/2023[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Aug 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos. 86 & 87/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2011-2012 & I.T.A. Nos. 88 & 89/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-2013 Saraswati Gupta,..................................Appellant Radha Kunj, 4D, 181, Dharamtalla Road, Salkia, Howrah-711106 [Pan: Adapg1993M] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,...............................Respondent Ward-47(1), Kolkata, 3, Government Place (West), Kolkata-700001 Appearances By: Shri Chirag Desai, Office Staff On Behalf Of Shri Miraj D. Shah,A.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Prabhakar Prakash Ranjan, Jcit, Sr. D.R.,Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : June 22, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : August 04, 2023 O R D E R

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271ASection 271B

271A of the Act is leviable in a case when the assessee does not maintain the books of account as provided under section 44AA of the Act i.e. for non- compliance of section 44AA of the Act. Whereas penalty under section 271B of the Act is leviable for not getting the books of account audited

4
Business Income4
Natural Justice4

SARASWATI GUPTA,HOWRAH vs. I.T.O., WARD - 47(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 89/KOL/2023[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Aug 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos. 86 & 87/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2011-2012 & I.T.A. Nos. 88 & 89/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-2013 Saraswati Gupta,..................................Appellant Radha Kunj, 4D, 181, Dharamtalla Road, Salkia, Howrah-711106 [Pan: Adapg1993M] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,...............................Respondent Ward-47(1), Kolkata, 3, Government Place (West), Kolkata-700001 Appearances By: Shri Chirag Desai, Office Staff On Behalf Of Shri Miraj D. Shah,A.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Prabhakar Prakash Ranjan, Jcit, Sr. D.R.,Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : June 22, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : August 04, 2023 O R D E R

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271ASection 271B

271A of the Act is leviable in a case when the assessee does not maintain the books of account as provided under section 44AA of the Act i.e. for non- compliance of section 44AA of the Act. Whereas penalty under section 271B of the Act is leviable for not getting the books of account audited

SARASWATI GUPTA,HOWRAH vs. I.T.O., WARD - 47(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 87/KOL/2023[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Aug 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos. 86 & 87/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2011-2012 & I.T.A. Nos. 88 & 89/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-2013 Saraswati Gupta,..................................Appellant Radha Kunj, 4D, 181, Dharamtalla Road, Salkia, Howrah-711106 [Pan: Adapg1993M] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,...............................Respondent Ward-47(1), Kolkata, 3, Government Place (West), Kolkata-700001 Appearances By: Shri Chirag Desai, Office Staff On Behalf Of Shri Miraj D. Shah,A.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Prabhakar Prakash Ranjan, Jcit, Sr. D.R.,Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : June 22, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : August 04, 2023 O R D E R

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271ASection 271B

271A of the Act is leviable in a case when the assessee does not maintain the books of account as provided under section 44AA of the Act i.e. for non- compliance of section 44AA of the Act. Whereas penalty under section 271B of the Act is leviable for not getting the books of account audited

SARASWATI GUPTA,HOWRAH vs. I.T.O., WARD - 47(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 88/KOL/2023[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Aug 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos. 86 & 87/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2011-2012 & I.T.A. Nos. 88 & 89/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-2013 Saraswati Gupta,..................................Appellant Radha Kunj, 4D, 181, Dharamtalla Road, Salkia, Howrah-711106 [Pan: Adapg1993M] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,...............................Respondent Ward-47(1), Kolkata, 3, Government Place (West), Kolkata-700001 Appearances By: Shri Chirag Desai, Office Staff On Behalf Of Shri Miraj D. Shah,A.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Prabhakar Prakash Ranjan, Jcit, Sr. D.R.,Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : June 22, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : August 04, 2023 O R D E R

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271ASection 271B

271A of the Act is leviable in a case when the assessee does not maintain the books of account as provided under section 44AA of the Act i.e. for non- compliance of section 44AA of the Act. Whereas penalty under section 271B of the Act is leviable for not getting the books of account audited

ANITA BASAK,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CC 1(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2174/KOL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm Anita Basak Acit, Central Circle 1(1), C/O. S.N. Ghosh & Associates, Kolkata, Advocates, Aaykar Bhawan Poorva, 2, Garstin Place, 2 Nd Floor, Suite 110 Shanti Pally, 5 Th Floor, Vs. No.203, Off Hare Street, Kolkata, Eastern Metropolitian By Pass, West Bengal-700001, Kolkata-700107, West Bengal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Ahhpb5785B Assessee By : Shri Somnath Ghosh, Ar Revenue By : Shri Ruchika Sharma, Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 19.12.2025

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ruchika Sharma, DR
Section 1Section 133Section 143(3)Section 144Section 144ASection 145(3)Section 270ASection 271Section 271ASection 44A

68, 69, 269SS, 269T, 140(3) etc. in the enactment of section 44AD. Thus reading entire scheme of the Act one has to hold that profit computed as per section 44AD of the Act by application of flat rate is one recognized method of computation of total income, or part of total income. The fact that the above

AMIT KHEMKA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 43(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 635/KOL/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

For Appellant: Shri Vikash Kumar Agarwal, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kumar Pati, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 250Section 271BSection 68

68 of the Act was made. Aggrieved with the assessment order, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A)-13, Kolkata. The Ld. CIT(A) observed that the sum of actual cash and other deposits in the bank account no. 911010025080997 in Axis Bank was Rs.2,32,34,819/- and not Rs.2,25,97,324/- as considered

AMIT KHEMKA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 43(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 636/KOL/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

For Appellant: Shri Vikash Kumar Agarwal, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kumar Pati, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 250Section 271BSection 68

68 of the Act was made. Aggrieved with the assessment order, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A)-13, Kolkata. The Ld. CIT(A) observed that the sum of actual cash and other deposits in the bank account no. 911010025080997 in Axis Bank was Rs.2,32,34,819/- and not Rs.2,25,97,324/- as considered

ACIT, CIRCLE-33, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. G. D. CONSTRUCTION & CO., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands dismissed

ITA 1596/KOL/2014[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Dec 2017AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Aby.T Varkey & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 144

271A of the Act. 6.3 We also find that various Tribunal’s orders as well as judgments of various Hon'ble High Courts have held that profit declared in the contractor business @ 4 to 6% is quite reasonable some of the cases are listed below:- 3. In the case of Metropolitan Engg. Co. Opt. Society Ltd. vs. ACIT ITA No.s

RAJESH AGARWAL,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 36(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 839/KOL/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Apr 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A. Nos. 839 To 842/Kol/2017 Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Rajesh Agarwal..............................…………………………………..................................Appellant C/O S.L. Kachar, Advocate, 86, Canning Street, Kolkata – 700 001. [Pan : Adhpa 3042 Q] Ito Ward 36(1) Kolkata……………………………………………….............................Respondent 110, Shantipally, Kolkata – 700 107 Appearances By: Shri Anil Kochar, Advocate Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri A Bhattacharjee, Addl Cit Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : April 11, 2018 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 13, 2018 Order

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 271BSection 44A

68,58,239/- and Rs. 2,71,63,464/- for A.Y. 2007- 08, 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 respectively. On appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) as well as Tribunal allowed part relief to the assessee by 3 I.T.A. Nos.839 to 842/Kol/2017 Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Rajesh Agarwal reducing the rate

RAJESH AGARWAL,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 36(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 841/KOL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Apr 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A. Nos. 839 To 842/Kol/2017 Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Rajesh Agarwal..............................…………………………………..................................Appellant C/O S.L. Kachar, Advocate, 86, Canning Street, Kolkata – 700 001. [Pan : Adhpa 3042 Q] Ito Ward 36(1) Kolkata……………………………………………….............................Respondent 110, Shantipally, Kolkata – 700 107 Appearances By: Shri Anil Kochar, Advocate Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri A Bhattacharjee, Addl Cit Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : April 11, 2018 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 13, 2018 Order

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 271BSection 44A

68,58,239/- and Rs. 2,71,63,464/- for A.Y. 2007- 08, 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 respectively. On appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) as well as Tribunal allowed part relief to the assessee by 3 I.T.A. Nos.839 to 842/Kol/2017 Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Rajesh Agarwal reducing the rate

RAJESH AGARWAL,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 36(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 842/KOL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Apr 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A. Nos. 839 To 842/Kol/2017 Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Rajesh Agarwal..............................…………………………………..................................Appellant C/O S.L. Kachar, Advocate, 86, Canning Street, Kolkata – 700 001. [Pan : Adhpa 3042 Q] Ito Ward 36(1) Kolkata……………………………………………….............................Respondent 110, Shantipally, Kolkata – 700 107 Appearances By: Shri Anil Kochar, Advocate Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri A Bhattacharjee, Addl Cit Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : April 11, 2018 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 13, 2018 Order

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 271BSection 44A

68,58,239/- and Rs. 2,71,63,464/- for A.Y. 2007- 08, 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 respectively. On appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) as well as Tribunal allowed part relief to the assessee by 3 I.T.A. Nos.839 to 842/Kol/2017 Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Rajesh Agarwal reducing the rate

RAJESH AGARWAL,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 36(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 840/KOL/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Apr 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A. Nos. 839 To 842/Kol/2017 Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Rajesh Agarwal..............................…………………………………..................................Appellant C/O S.L. Kachar, Advocate, 86, Canning Street, Kolkata – 700 001. [Pan : Adhpa 3042 Q] Ito Ward 36(1) Kolkata……………………………………………….............................Respondent 110, Shantipally, Kolkata – 700 107 Appearances By: Shri Anil Kochar, Advocate Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri A Bhattacharjee, Addl Cit Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : April 11, 2018 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 13, 2018 Order

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 271BSection 44A

68,58,239/- and Rs. 2,71,63,464/- for A.Y. 2007- 08, 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 respectively. On appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) as well as Tribunal allowed part relief to the assessee by 3 I.T.A. Nos.839 to 842/Kol/2017 Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Rajesh Agarwal reducing the rate