BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 245Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai143Delhi74Hyderabad47Jaipur21Visakhapatnam19Chandigarh14Pune12Indore11Chennai10Ahmedabad6Bangalore6Kolkata4Lucknow4SC4Guwahati3Varanasi3Rajkot2Raipur2Telangana2Cochin2Karnataka2Allahabad1Orissa1Surat1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 14814Section 245C(1)4Section 683Section 2633Section 245D(4)2Section 292B2Section 1472Section 245F2Addition to Income2Reassessment

DCIT, CC-4(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S MANI SQUARE LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1052/KOL/2015[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Nov 2017AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 245C(1)Section 245FSection 292BSection 68Section 69

68 of the Act and Rs.4,29,534/- u/s. 69 of the Act to the income of the assessee and thereby assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.54,20,360/-. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who was pleased to allow the appeal of the assessee and held that since the AO issued

2
Reopening of Assessment2

DCIT,CC-4(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S MANI SQUARE LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1053/KOL/2015[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Nov 2017AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 245C(1)Section 245FSection 292BSection 68Section 69

68 of the Act and Rs.4,29,534/- u/s. 69 of the Act to the income of the assessee and thereby assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.54,20,360/-. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who was pleased to allow the appeal of the assessee and held that since the AO issued

ACIT, KOLKATA vs. SUBHAS KUMAR KEDIA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1648/KOL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Apr 2025AY 2017-18
Section 143(1)Section 245D(4)Section 68

sections": [ "68", "245D(4)", "143(1)" ], "issues": "Whether the cash deposit in the bank account was unexplained income or adequately

M/S. MAITHAN STEEL & POWER LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-1, KOLKATA

ITA 793/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Feb 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri P.M.Jagtap, Vice- & Shri S.S.Godaraassessment Year:2014-15

Section 115JSection 245DSection 245D(4)Section 263Section 32ESection 43B

section 115JB. Therefore, the above mentioned irregularity has resulted in underassessment of income of Rs.11,04,19,703/- having potential tax effect of Rs.2,78,89,308/- ii) It is observed that the assessee deducted an amount of Rs.6,28,68,798/- from income as “Payment of excise Duty in respect of earlier years now allowable” as per details