BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “section 68”+ Section 245C(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Hyderabad43Mumbai35Delhi35Visakhapatnam19Jaipur13Pune13Indore9Cochin7Kolkata5Bangalore2SC2Karnataka1Chennai1Chandigarh1Surat1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 14817Section 26415Section 119Section 1475Section 245C(1)4Section 2503Section 12A3Section 143(3)3Exemption3Addition to Income

DCIT, CC-4(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S MANI SQUARE LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1052/KOL/2015[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Nov 2017AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 245C(1)Section 245FSection 292BSection 68Section 69

245C(1) the notice u/s. 148 of the Act for AY 2006-07 being covered AYs 2005-06 to 2012-13 is without jurisdiction and, therefore, erroneous and bad in law. The assessee company in order to contend that the notice issued u/s. 148 of the Act against the amalgamating company is bad in law relied on the decision

3
Revision u/s 2633
Reassessment2

DCIT,CC-4(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S MANI SQUARE LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1053/KOL/2015[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Nov 2017AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 245C(1)Section 245FSection 292BSection 68Section 69

245C(1) the notice u/s. 148 of the Act for AY 2006-07 being covered AYs 2005-06 to 2012-13 is without jurisdiction and, therefore, erroneous and bad in law. The assessee company in order to contend that the notice issued u/s. 148 of the Act against the amalgamating company is bad in law relied on the decision

THE CRICKET ASSOCIATION OF BENGAL,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), EXEMPTION, KOLKATA

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 275/KOL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 275/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2013-14 I.T.A. No. 276/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Counsel & Shri PFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit Kundu, CIT D/R
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 2Section 250Section 264

245C of the Income Tax Act for settlement of the assessment and thus the assessee wanted to reduce its tax liability. This fact is also missing in the instant appeal and, therefore, the same is not applicable in the case of the assessee. 10.3. So far as the remaining two decisions are concerned i.e., CIT vs. Premkumar Arjundas Luthra

THE CRICKET ASSOCIATION OF BENGAL,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), EXEMPTION, KOLKATA

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 277/KOL/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 275/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2013-14 I.T.A. No. 276/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Counsel & Shri PFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit Kundu, CIT D/R
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 2Section 250Section 264

245C of the Income Tax Act for settlement of the assessment and thus the assessee wanted to reduce its tax liability. This fact is also missing in the instant appeal and, therefore, the same is not applicable in the case of the assessee. 10.3. So far as the remaining two decisions are concerned i.e., CIT vs. Premkumar Arjundas Luthra

THE CRICKET ASSOCIATION OF BENGAL,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), EXEMPTION, KOLKATA

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 276/KOL/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 275/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2013-14 I.T.A. No. 276/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Counsel & Shri PFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit Kundu, CIT D/R
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 2Section 250Section 264

245C of the Income Tax Act for settlement of the assessment and thus the assessee wanted to reduce its tax liability. This fact is also missing in the instant appeal and, therefore, the same is not applicable in the case of the assessee. 10.3. So far as the remaining two decisions are concerned i.e., CIT vs. Premkumar Arjundas Luthra