307 results for “section 68”+ Section 2(24)(x)clear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 307 · Page 1 of 16
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed
Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, J.M. & Dr.A.L.Saini, A.M.) Asstt. Year : 2012-13 A.C.I.T, Cc-3(2), Kolkata Vs M/S. Snowtex Investment Ltd. Pan: Aaecs 0334C (Assessee/Department) (Respondent/Assessee)
section 2(24)(x). 7. The Ld. CIT(Appeals)-21/Kolkata erred in law in deleting the addition of Rs. 4,60,032/- without considering CBDT's circular no. 22/2015 on the issue of allowability of employees contribution to PF. 8 The Ld. CIT (Appeals)-21/Kolkata erred in law as well as on facts in deleting the disallowance