Search: section 68

5 results for “section 68”+ Section 17Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka64 Delhi28 Ahmedabad21 Lucknow11 Jaipur10 Mumbai10 Cochin7 Bangalore7 Kolkata5 Cuttack3 Chennai2 Rajkot1 Allahabad1 Chandigarh1 Indore1 Jabalpur1 Nagpur1 Pune1

Key Topics

Section 6810 Section 2636 Addition to Income5 Section 143(3)4 Section 2504 Section 1472 Section 1482 Section 153A2 Section 69C2 Reopening of Assessment

SUBODH CHANDRA DAS,HOOGHLY vs. I.T.O.,WARD-23(3), HOOGHLY

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2246/KOL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Mar 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Hon’Ble) Ita No. 2246 & 2247/Kol/2019 Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13

Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 68

17A of the Form 3CD, the Auditor himself accepted the fact that the assessee has made certain Form 3CD, the Auditor himself accepted the fact that the assessee has made certain Form 3CD, the Auditor himself accepted the fact that the assessee has made certain payments in cash by violation of section

SUBODH CHANDRA DAS,HOOGHLY vs. I.T.O.,WARD-23(3), HOOGHLY

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

SUBODH CHANDRA DAS,HOOGHLY vs. I.T.O.,WARD-23(3), HOOGHLY

SUBODH CHANDRA DAS,HOOGHLY vs. I.T.O.,WARD-23(3), HOOGHLY

SUBODH CHANDRA DAS,HOOGHLY vs. I.T.O.,WARD-23(3), HOOGHLY

SUBODH CHANDRA DAS,HOOGHLY vs. I.T.O.,WARD-23(3), HOOGHLY

DECPUTY COMMISSION OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. CHIRAG JEWELLERS, KOLKATA

ACIT, C.C-2(1), KOLKATA. , KOLKATA vs. SHALIMAR NUTRIENTS PVT. LTD. , KOLKATA

SHRI KRISHNA AGRI PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED ,KOLKATA vs. P.C.I.T.,-4, KOLKATA