BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “section 68”+ Section 15Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi45Mumbai30Hyderabad10Bangalore10Pune8Jaipur8Kolkata6SC5Chennai5Varanasi4Telangana4Ahmedabad4Indore3Karnataka3Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 271A16Section 14A4Addition to Income4Section 153A3Section 1323Section 683Section 1313Section 2502Section 143(2)2Disallowance

D.C.I.T., CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. WISE INVESTMENT PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 163/KOL/2023[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Nov 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 163/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-13 D.C.I.T. Central Circle – 1(4), Kolkata M/S. Wise Investment Pvt. Ltd. Vs 3Rd Floor 5, Govind Chand Dhar Lane Kolkata - 700001 [Pan: Aaacw3141R] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Manish Tiwari, Fca Revenue By : Shri Abhijit Kundu, Cit D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26/09/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 09/11/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Above Captioned Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Revenue Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax, Appeals -21, Kolkata, (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 26/12/2022, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:- “1. Whether On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case Ld. Cit (A) Is Justified In Deleting Addition Made U/S. 68 Of Rs.32,50,00,000/- Ignoring The Remand Report Dated 20.07.2022 Wherein The Report Categorically Stated That The Share Applicant Company Has No Creditworthiness To Invest In The Assesses Company. 2. Whether On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case Ld. Cit (A) Was Erroneous As It Had Not Taken Cognizance Of The Fact That The 2

For Appellant: Shri Manish Tiwari, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit Kundu, CIT D/R
Section 131Section 142(1)
2
Penalty2
Undisclosed Income2
Section 143(2)
Section 250
Section 68

68 of the Act for unexplained share capital and share premium of Rs.32,50,00,000/-. The alleged sum was received towards issue of equity shares and following share applicants applied for the equity shares and paid a sum of Rs. 32,50,00,000/-:- SI. Name & PAN Address No. of Total Share capital shares (including premium) 1. Aryan Vintrade

M/S. SUPRABHA INDUSTRIES LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 4(3), , KOLKATA

Appeals are allowed

ITA 2373/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Oct 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri S. S. Godara, Jm आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A Nos.2372&2373/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15) M/S Suprabha Industries Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-4(3), Kolkata Continental Chambers, 15A Hemant Basu Sarani, Kolkata "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadcs9389J (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/R Respondent By : Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. Cit सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 19/10/2020 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 22/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri S. S. Godara: These Assessee’S Two Appeals For Assessment Years 2013-14 & 2014-15 Arise Against The Commissioner Of Income Tax (A) - 21, Kolkata’S Separate Orders Both Dated 27.08.2018 Passed In Case No.10527&10538/Dcit,Cc-4(3)/Cit(A)- 21/Kol/2016-17 Involving Proceedings U/S 271Aab Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short ‘The Act’; Respectively. Heard Both The Parties. Case Files/Records Perused. 2. The Assessee’S Identical Sole Substantive Grievance In Both These Appeals Challenges Correctness Of The Lower Authorities’ Action Imposing Section 271Aab Penalties Of Rs.44,93,035/- @30% Of The Alleged Undisclosed Income Of Rs.1,49,76,784/- Each By The Assessing Officer In His Twin Separate Orders; Both Dated 28.09.16 & Restricted To 10% Each In The Cit(A)’S Lower Appellate Discussion Reading As Under:

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/RFor Respondent: Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 2Section 271A

15A Hemant Basu Sarani, Kolkata "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AADCS9389J (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/R Respondent by : Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date of Hearing : 19/10/2020 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 22/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri S. S. Godara: These assessee’s two appeals for assessment years

M/S. SUPRABHA INDUSTRIES LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 4(3), , KOLKATA

Appeals are allowed

ITA 2372/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Oct 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri S. S. Godara, Jm आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A Nos.2372&2373/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15) M/S Suprabha Industries Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-4(3), Kolkata Continental Chambers, 15A Hemant Basu Sarani, Kolkata "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadcs9389J (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/R Respondent By : Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. Cit सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 19/10/2020 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 22/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri S. S. Godara: These Assessee’S Two Appeals For Assessment Years 2013-14 & 2014-15 Arise Against The Commissioner Of Income Tax (A) - 21, Kolkata’S Separate Orders Both Dated 27.08.2018 Passed In Case No.10527&10538/Dcit,Cc-4(3)/Cit(A)- 21/Kol/2016-17 Involving Proceedings U/S 271Aab Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short ‘The Act’; Respectively. Heard Both The Parties. Case Files/Records Perused. 2. The Assessee’S Identical Sole Substantive Grievance In Both These Appeals Challenges Correctness Of The Lower Authorities’ Action Imposing Section 271Aab Penalties Of Rs.44,93,035/- @30% Of The Alleged Undisclosed Income Of Rs.1,49,76,784/- Each By The Assessing Officer In His Twin Separate Orders; Both Dated 28.09.16 & Restricted To 10% Each In The Cit(A)’S Lower Appellate Discussion Reading As Under:

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/RFor Respondent: Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 2Section 271A

15A Hemant Basu Sarani, Kolkata "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AADCS9389J (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/R Respondent by : Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date of Hearing : 19/10/2020 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 22/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri S. S. Godara: These assessee’s two appeals for assessment years

ACIT, CIRCLE -15(1),KOLKATA,KOLKATA vs. BALJIT SECURITIES PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of revenue is partly allowed

ITA 346/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Feb 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 115JSection 14A

15A to 15C of paper book. Moreover Hon’ble ITAT, Kolkata had held in assessee’s own case in the A.Y.2009-10 that earning of dividend was merely incidental! to the holding of shares (as stock in trade) for the particular period within which dividend was declared - The balance sheet of the assessee does not show any investment & all the shares

MANIPUR TEA CO. PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-4, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1749/KOL/2017[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Apr 2018AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am] I.T.A. No. 1749/Kol/2017 Assessment Year: 2002-03 Manipur Tea Co. Pvt. Ltd................................…………………………………………………Appellant Continental Chambers, 4Th Floor, 15A, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Kolkata – 700 001 [Pan: Aaact 9636 I] Acit Cir 4 Kolkata...................……………………………………………...........................Respondent P-7, Chowringhee Square, Aayakar Bhawan, 3Rd Floor, Kolkata – 700 069 Appearances By: Shri M.K. Jain, Ar Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Gautam Patra, Addl. Cit Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : February 13, 2018 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 06, 2018 Order This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A) - 2, Kolkata Dated 10.04.2017 Whereby He Confirmed The Various Additions / Disallowances Made By The A.O. To The Total Income Of The Assessee.

15A, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Kolkata – 700 001 [PAN: AAACT 9636 I] ACIT CIR 4 Kolkata...................……………………………………………...........................Respondent P-7, Chowringhee Square, Aayakar Bhawan, 3rd Floor, Kolkata – 700 069 Appearances by: Shri M.K. Jain, AR appearing on behalf of the Assessee. Shri Gautam Patra, Addl. CIT appearing on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : February 13, 2018 Date

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 4(3) , KOLKATA vs. SRI SHASHANKDHAR MANTRI , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2494/KOL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Feb 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 2494/Kol/2019 Assessment Year: 2016-17 A.C.I.T., Central Circle - 4(3), Kolkata Shri Shashankdhar Mantri Vs Continental Chambers 15A, Hemant Basu Sarani Kolkata - 700001 [Pan : Ajjpm5600L] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Miraj D. Shah, A.R. Revenue By : Shri P.P. Barman, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 09/02/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 20/02/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Revenue Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-21, Kolkata, (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 12/09/2019, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act’), For Assessment Year 2016-17. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is An Individual & He E- Filed The Return Of Income For Assessment Year 2016-17 On 31/07/2016 Declaring Total Income Of Rs. 30,30,350/-. Case Selected For Limited Scrutiny Under Cass Followed By Serving Of Notice U/S 143(2) & 142(1) Of Act. In The Course Of Assessment Proceedings, The Ld. Assessing Officer Noticed That During The Year Under Consideration The Assessee Had Deposited Cash Of Rs.1,49,00,000/- In The Bank Accounts Held With Uco Bank & Kotak Mahindra Bank. The Assessee Was Asked To Explain The Source Of Said Cash Deposits. In Reply, The Assesse Submitted That It Had Offered Income Of Rs.4.10 Crores In The Income For Assessment Year 2012-13 & 2013-14 Declared , During The Course Of Search, Towards Commodity Speculation Income Earned In Those Years & The Same Were Duly Disclosed In The

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D. Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri P.P. Barman, Addl. CIT
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 250Section 68

15A, Hemant Basu Sarani Kolkata - 700001 [PAN : AJJPM5600L] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Miraj D. Shah, A.R. Revenue by : Shri P.P. Barman, Addl. CIT सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date of Hearing : 09/02/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 20/02/2023 आदेश/O R D E R PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : The present appeal is directed at the instance