BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 801A(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi29Mumbai23Hyderabad23Indore15Chennai9Ahmedabad6Patna6Kolkata5Rajkot4Bangalore4Jaipur4Lucknow3Raipur1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 80I30Section 143(3)9Section 1487Section 153A5Section 1475Deduction4Section 139(1)3Addition to Income3Section 143(2)

D.C.I.T CIR - 8,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S ABCI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of revenue is dismissed

ITA 990/KOL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jan 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: "ी ऐ. ट". वक", "यायीक सद"य एवं/And "ी एम .बालागणेश, लेखा सद"य) [Before Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am]

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 801ASection 80I

reassessment has to be based on fulfillment of certain pre-condition and if the concept of 'change of opinion' is removed, as contended on behalf of the Department, then, in the garb of reopening the assessment, review would take place. One must treat the concept of 'change of opinion' as an in-built test to check abuse of power

A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-2(1), KOLKATA vs. M/S ABCI INTRASTRACTURE PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

2
Section 802

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 285/KOL/2020[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Aug 2021AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey & Dr. M. L. Meena]

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 80Section 80I

147 of the Act after issuing notice u/s. 148 on 10.09.2010 on the same reasons as stated in the present case that Assessee Company was merely a contractor and, therefore, would not be eligible to claim deduction u/s. 80IA of the Act. However, this Tribunal in that case for AY 2006-07 held that the assessee company was developing

A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-2(1), KOLKATA vs. M/S ABCI INFRASTRACTURE PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 279/KOL/2020[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Aug 2021AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey & Dr. M. L. Meena]

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 80Section 80I

147 of the Act after issuing notice u/s. 148 on 10.09.2010 on the same reasons as stated in the present case that Assessee Company was merely a contractor and, therefore, would not be eligible to claim deduction u/s. 80IA of the Act. However, this Tribunal in that case for AY 2006-07 held that the assessee company was developing

GRAPHITE INDIA LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 11, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed as indicated above and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 398/KOL/2008[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Jan 2016AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 8Section 80HSection 80I

4. Aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(Appeals), the assessee and Revenue both are in appeals before the Tribunal on the following grounds:- 1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Ld. CIT(Appeals) was not justified and grossly erred in not holding that reassessment proceedings u/s. 147/148 has been initiated in utter

D.C.I.T CC - XIII,KOLKATA., KOLKATA vs. M/S TANTIA CONSTRACTION LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee as well as the revenue are dismissed

ITA 69/KOL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Sept 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm]

For Appellant: Shri Manish Tiwari, ARFor Respondent: Shri G. Mallikarjuna, CIT, DR
Section 115JSection 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

reassess the total income in respect of each asst year falling within such six years, the said assessments have to be framed as per law and only such receipt which can be legally includible can be brought to taxation. Since the retention money is taxable only in the year of release by respective authorities as per judicial decisions referred earlier