BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 56(2)(viia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai37Hyderabad28Bangalore22Chennai21Delhi7Jodhpur6Kolkata3Jaipur2Patna1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(viia)14Addition to Income3Section 1482Section 143(3)2Deduction2Disallowance2

NAVNIRMAN INFRACON PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 10(2), , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 689/KOL/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Oct 2025AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Manish Tiwari, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Kumar Mehta, Addl. Sr. DR
Section 148Section 250Section 56(2)(via)Section 56(2)(viia)

reassessment u/s 148 was invalid as it did not mention the mandatory sanction from the higher authority as required by law. Furthermore, the reasons recorded for reopening were considered to be based on suspicion rather than a 'reason to believe', constituting a 'fishing and roving inquiry'.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "147", "148", "151", "56(2)(via)", "56(2)(viia

UCO BANK,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -6, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1202/KOL/2012[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Oct 2016AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm]

For Appellant: S/Shri D.S.Damle & Akkal Dudhwewala, FCAFor Respondent: Shri G. Mallikarjuna, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(viia)

56,86,471/- on the ground that the deduction under Section 36(1)(viia) needs to be restricted to actual provision made in the books.” 2.1. The ld AR argued that this issue pertains to claim of deduction towards provision for bad and doubtful debts as per the provisions of section 36(1)(viia) of the Act in excess

DCIT,CIRCLE-6, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. UCO BANK, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1281/KOL/2012[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Oct 2016AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm]

For Appellant: S/Shri D.S.Damle & Akkal Dudhwewala, FCAFor Respondent: Shri G. Mallikarjuna, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(viia)

56,86,471/- on the ground that the deduction under Section 36(1)(viia) needs to be restricted to actual provision made in the books.” 2.1. The ld AR argued that this issue pertains to claim of deduction towards provision for bad and doubtful debts as per the provisions of section 36(1)(viia) of the Act in excess