DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND SPONGE AND IRON PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act. 14.1. Since, we have already decided the issue in ground no. 2 & 3 in ITA No. 1395/KOL/2025 for A.Y. 2015-16 in assessee’s appeal, wherein assessee has challenged the part sustaining of addition

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act. 14.1. Since, we have already decided the issue in ground no. 2 & 3 in ITA No. 1395/KOL/2025 for A.Y. 2015-16 in assessee’s appeal, wherein assessee has challenged the part sustaining of addition

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act. 14.1. Since, we have already decided the issue in ground no. 2 & 3 in ITA No. 1395/KOL/2025 for A.Y. 2015-16 in assessee’s appeal, wherein assessee has challenged the part sustaining of addition

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act. 14.1. Since, we have already decided the issue in ground no. 2 & 3 in ITA No. 1395/KOL/2025 for A.Y. 2015-16 in assessee’s appeal, wherein assessee has challenged the part sustaining of addition

GOPAL & SONS HUF,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 32(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act. 14.1. Since, we have already decided the issue in ground no. 2 & 3 in ITA No. 1395/KOL/2025 for A.Y. 2015-16 in assessee’s appeal, wherein assessee has challenged the part sustaining of addition

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act.\n14. 1. Since, we have already decided the issue in ground no. 2 & 3 in\nITA No. 1395/KOL/2025 for A.Y. 2015-16 in assessee's appeal, wherein\nassessee has challenged the part sustaining of addition

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act.\n14. 1. Since, we have already decided the issue in ground no. 2 & 3 in\nITA No. 1395/KOL/2025 for A.Y. 2015-16 in assessee's appeal, wherein\nassessee has challenged the part sustaining of addition

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act.\n14. 1. Since, we have already decided the issue in ground no. 2 & 3 in\nITA No. 1395/KOL/2025 for A.Y. 2015-16 in assessee's appeal, wherein\nassessee has challenged the part sustaining of addition

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act.\n14. 1. Since, we have already decided the issue in ground no. 2 & 3 in\nITA No. 1395/KOL/2025 for A.Y. 2015-16 in assessee's appeal, wherein\nassessee has challenged the part sustaining of addition

BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PVT. LTD.,,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act.\n14. 1. Since, we have already decided the issue in ground no. 2 & 3 in\nITA No. 1395/KOL/2025 for A.Y. 2015-16 in assessee's appeal, wherein\nassessee has challenged the part sustaining of addition

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act.\n14. 1. Since, we have already decided the issue in ground no. 2 & 3 in\nITA No. 1395/KOL/2025 for A.Y. 2015-16 in assessee's appeal, wherein\nassessee has challenged the part sustaining of addition

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND LEASE FIN PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act.\n14. 1. Since, we have already decided the issue in ground no. 2 & 3 in\nITA No. 1395/KOL/2025 for A.Y. 2015-16 in assessee's appeal, wherein\nassessee has challenged the part sustaining of addition

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act.\n14. 1. Since, we have already decided the issue in ground no. 2 & 3 in\nITA No. 1395/KOL/2025 for A.Y. 2015-16 in assessee's appeal, wherein\nassessee has challenged the part sustaining of addition

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act.\n14. 1. Since, we have already decided the issue in ground no. 2 & 3 in\nITA No. 1395/KOL/2025 for A.Y. 2015-16 in assessee's appeal, wherein\nassessee has challenged the part sustaining of addition

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND SPONGE AND IRON PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act.\n14. 1. Since, we have already decided the issue in ground no. 2 & 3 in\nITA No. 1395/KOL/2025 for A.Y. 2015-16 in assessee's appeal, wherein\nassessee has challenged the part sustaining of addition

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND SPONGE AND IRON PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act.\n14. 1. Since, we have already decided the issue in ground no. 2 & 3 in\nITA No. 1395/KOL/2025 for A.Y. 2015-16 in assessee's appeal, wherein\nassessee has challenged the part sustaining of addition

M/S BHIKSHU AGENCY PVT. LTD.,HOWRAH vs. ITO, WD-5(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav & Dr. Manish Borad

unexplained. We notice that during the year under consideration the assessee has received share application money against issue of equity shares having face value of Rs. 10/- and security premium of Rs. 240/- and received sum of Rs. 4,07,30,000/- from the following share applicants: S.No. Name, Address & PAN of No. of Share Capital Premium (Rs.) Total

GODAVARI MULTIPURPOSE ARTICLES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 7(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee isallowed

Bench: Shri Manish Borad, Accountant Member Shri Sonjoy Sarma (Judicial Member)

unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act. 4. At the time of hearing, the appellant/assessee objected to reopening by stating that the Ld. AO has neither recorded in the cogent reasons and not brought any tangible material to suggests that escapement of income. He argued that the Ld. CIT(A) had relied merely on the information provided by the Investigation