BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 80Iclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai32Delhi12Indore7Surat6Kolkata4Chennai2Cochin2Telangana1Jaipur1Karnataka1Punjab & Haryana1Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 26310Section 80I8Section 143(3)6Section 1476Addition to Income4Section 143(1)3Section 1483Deduction3Disallowance3Section 139(1)

DCIT, CIRCLE - 10(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. GOODCARE PHARMA PVT. LTD., , KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2485/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Apr 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice-(Kz) & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80I

80I(10) or 80IC(7). As against the explanation' and overwhelming evidences filed by the assessee, the AO has not brought on record any evidence to show that raw material cost or the labour cost of both the units was same and the explanation of the assessee was not acceptable. The AO has also not brought on record any evidence

DCIT, CIRCLE - 10(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. GOODCARE PHARMA PVT. LTD., , KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2486/KOL/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed
2
ITAT Kolkata
05 Apr 2019
AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice-(Kz) & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80I

80I(10) or 80IC(7). As against the explanation' and overwhelming evidences filed by the assessee, the AO has not brought on record any evidence to show that raw material cost or the labour cost of both the units was same and the explanation of the assessee was not acceptable. The AO has also not brought on record any evidence

SRI MOTILAL JAIN,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD-35(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1986/KOL/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Mar 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 69

section 80HH and 80I. The Hon’ble Delhi High Court, however, held that it was not permissible. Explaining the legal position in this regard, Hon’ble Delhi High Court observed that if even though Assessing Officer had a jurisdiction to reassess

M/S MERLINS,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T.,CILCLE-31, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1999/KOL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Jun 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap(Kz)] [Through Virtual Court] I.T.A. No. 1999/Kol/2019 Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Merlins......................................…………………………..................................................Appellant 22, Prince Anwar Shah Road, Kolkata – 700 033. [Pan: Aatfm 9672 P] Vs Acit, Circle – 31, Kolkata...................…………………………………………………..............Respondent Kolkata. Appearances By: Shri Rakesh Jain, Ar Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Jayanta Khanra, Jcit, Sr. Dr Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : May 13, 2021 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : June 23, 2021 Order

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 14ASection 80H

80I was reduced. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer had jurisdiction to reassess issues other than the issues in respect of which proceedings were initiated even when the reasons for the latter ceased to survive. The question before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court was whether the Tribunal was right in holding so or not and the same