BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Section 80Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur19Mumbai16Lucknow8Delhi8Cochin7Pune6Hyderabad5Cuttack4Bangalore4Visakhapatnam3Amritsar3Chennai3Surat2Nagpur2Ahmedabad2Kolkata2Ranchi1Varanasi1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 1442Section 682Section 1482Section 80C2Addition to Income2

SK. SAIFUL ALI,HALDIA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 27(1), HALDIA, HALDIA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 150/KOL/2023[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Jun 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. No. 150/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2011-2012 Sk. Saiful Ali,.........................................Appellant Raj Stile, Khajanchak, Durgachak, Haldia, Purba Medinipur-721602 [Pan: Akipa2468E] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,.................................Respondent Ward-27(1), Haldia, Durgachak, Haldia, Purna Medinipur-721602 Appearances By: Shri Soumitra Choudhry, A.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Vijay Kumar, Addl. Cit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : April 12, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : June 13, 2023 O R D E R

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 80C

section 144 of the Act on 26.12.2017 framed by ld. ITO, Ward-27(1), Haldia. 2. The Registry has pointed out that the appeal is time- barred by 19 days. In order to explain the delay, the assessee has filed COD along with the affidavit mentioning the reason for the delay in filing the instant appeal that the same

ASHOK CHAURASIA,PARBATIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, HALDIA

Appeal are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 358/KOL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Apr 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 144Section 250Section 44ASection 68

section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the addition is not tenable at law and liable to be deleted. 12. That the Assessing Officer has erred in law as well as in facts by making an addition to the income-from business amounting to Rs. 14,09,790 where no mention of such income is discussed