BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 801A(7)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai35Delhi19Hyderabad19Chennai13Indore7Patna6Jodhpur5Jaipur4Kolkata4Ahmedabad3Lucknow3Cochin1Chandigarh1Pune1Raipur1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 234B12Section 115J12Section 2504Section 1544Section 234C4Section 801A4Section 92C4Deduction4

BINANI CEMENT LTD.,MUMBAI vs. D.C.I.T., CENTRAL CIRCLE-XXVIII, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue as well as the assessee are dismissed as infructuous

ITA 1726/KOL/2014[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 May 2025AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115JSection 154Section 234BSection 234CSection 250Section 801ASection 92C

801A of the IT Act. (4) The appellant craves leave to add, alter, modify, amend and/or delete all or any of the foregoing Grounds of Appeal on or during the hearing.” IV. ITA No. 470/KOL/2018; A.Y. 2013-14: “1. That on the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting

ACIT, CIR-14(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. ULTRATECH NATHDWARA CEMENT LTD.(KNOWN AS M/S BINANI CEMENT LTD.), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue as well as the assessee are dismissed as infructuous

ITA 611/KOL/2015[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 May 2025AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115JSection 154Section 234BSection 234CSection 250Section 801ASection 92C

801A of the IT Act. (4) The appellant craves leave to add, alter, modify, amend and/or delete all or any of the foregoing Grounds of Appeal on or during the hearing.” IV. ITA No. 470/KOL/2018; A.Y. 2013-14: “1. That on the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting

M/S. ULTRATECH NATHDWARA CEMENT LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S. BINANI CEMENT LTD.,),KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue as well as the assessee are dismissed as infructuous

ITA 152/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 May 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115JSection 154Section 234BSection 234CSection 250Section 801ASection 92C

801A of the IT Act. (4) The appellant craves leave to add, alter, modify, amend and/or delete all or any of the foregoing Grounds of Appeal on or during the hearing.” IV. ITA No. 470/KOL/2018; A.Y. 2013-14: “1. That on the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. ULTRATECH NATHDWARA CEMENT LTD. (KNOWN AS M/S. BINANI CEMENT LTD.), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue as well as the assessee are dismissed as infructuous

ITA 470/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 May 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115JSection 154Section 234BSection 234CSection 250Section 801ASection 92C

801A of the IT Act. (4) The appellant craves leave to add, alter, modify, amend and/or delete all or any of the foregoing Grounds of Appeal on or during the hearing.” IV. ITA No. 470/KOL/2018; A.Y. 2013-14: “1. That on the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting