Search: reassessment

6 results for “reassessment”+ Section 40A(2)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai91 Delhi56 Chennai55 Amritsar36 Bangalore35 Jaipur27 Raipur25 Hyderabad17 Rajkot17 Agra14 Pune11 Jodhpur10 Guwahati9 Indore8 Ahmedabad8 Lucknow8 Patna8 Nagpur7 Cochin6 Kolkata6 Surat2 Dehradun1 Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 14818 Section 14711 Section 148A8 Section 2507 Section 143(3)4 Addition to Income4 Section 143(2)3 Section 36(1)(va)3 Section 197(1)3 Reassessment

M/S. JAGMAG MERCANTILES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 12(1), , KOLKATA

In the result, the both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 709/KOL/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shripradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Bansal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Prabhakar Prakash Ranjan

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 68

b) of the IT Act. Under these circumstances, in the light of the judgment of this Court in Begur's case and the judgment of the Bombay High Court in Mukesh's case supra, I am of the considered opinion that the impugned notice at Annexure - A and also consequential proceedings, orders, notices, etc., deserves to be quashed by reserving

M/S. JAGMAG MERCANTILES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 12(1), , KOLKATA

M/S. JAGMAG MERCANTILES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 12(1), , KOLKATA

M/S. JAGMAG MERCANTILES PRIVATE LIMITED.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 12(1), , KOLKATA

SAMIRUDDIN KHAN,BURDWAN vs. ITO, WARD 1(2), , BURDWAN

RAJA UDYOG (P) LTD.,24-PARGANAS (N) vs. ACIT, CC-4(3), KOL, KOLKATA

RISING RETAILS(P)LTD,KOLKATA vs. ITO,WARD-4(1), KOLKATA

M/S. DELIGHTED HOLDINGS (P) LTD. ,KOLKATA vs. DCIR, CIR-8(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA