BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 35Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai9Delhi5Kolkata4Bangalore3SC1

Key Topics

Section 35E8Reassessment3Reopening of Assessment3Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 282

M/S. BENGAL EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - XVI, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 361/KOL/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Nov 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm ]

For Appellant: Shri Satish Khosla, Advocate & Shri Manish Khosla AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri David Z.Chowngth, Addl. CIT(DR)
Section 148Section 28Section 35E

35E of the Act, as were necessary for assessment, in the reasons recorded, cannot per say fulfil the requirement of law when there is full disclosure of all the facts,. The requirement of the proviso to section 147 of the Act are not fulfilled in this case. 11. The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of M/s. Hindustan

ACIT, CIRCLE-2, ASANSOL, ASANSOL vs. M/S. EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD.,

In the result, ITA No. 1636/Kol/2014 (Revenue’s appeal) is dismissed, ITA No

ITA 1636/KOL/2014[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Jul 2017AY 2005-2006

Bench: "ी ऐ. ट". वक", "यायीक सद"य एवं/And डॉ. अजु"न लाल सैनी, लेखा सद"य) [Before Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 35E

35E. 3. That the Ld. CIT(A), Asansol has erred in law that the order of reassessment is bad in law since the prescribed procedure is not followed. Accordingly cancelled the order of re- assessment made by AO. and deleting the addition of Rs.1,71 ,40,000/- made by the AO on account of disallowance under the head royalty

ACIT, CIRCLE-2, ASANSOL, ASANSOL vs. M/S. EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD.,

In the result, ITA No. 1636/Kol/2014 (Revenue’s appeal) is dismissed, ITA No

ITA 1637/KOL/2014[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Jul 2017AY 2006-2007

Bench: "ी ऐ. ट". वक", "यायीक सद"य एवं/And डॉ. अजु"न लाल सैनी, लेखा सद"य) [Before Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 35E

35E. 3. That the Ld. CIT(A), Asansol has erred in law that the order of reassessment is bad in law since the prescribed procedure is not followed. Accordingly cancelled the order of re- assessment made by AO. and deleting the addition of Rs.1,71 ,40,000/- made by the AO on account of disallowance under the head royalty

EASTERN COALFILELDS LTD. vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, ASANSOL, ASANSOL

In the result, ITA No. 1636/Kol/2014 (Revenue’s appeal) is dismissed, ITA No

ITA 1654/KOL/2014[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Jul 2017AY 2006-2007

Bench: "ी ऐ. ट". वक", "यायीक सद"य एवं/And डॉ. अजु"न लाल सैनी, लेखा सद"य) [Before Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 35E

35E. 3. That the Ld. CIT(A), Asansol has erred in law that the order of reassessment is bad in law since the prescribed procedure is not followed. Accordingly cancelled the order of re- assessment made by AO. and deleting the addition of Rs.1,71 ,40,000/- made by the AO on account of disallowance under the head royalty