BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 234Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai65Delhi33Ahmedabad29Hyderabad28Bangalore24Raipur19Jaipur17Surat8Kolkata3Chandigarh3Guwahati2Rajkot2Dehradun2Varanasi1Lucknow1Nagpur1Pune1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 1479Section 2639Section 143(3)7Section 1486Section 10(38)3Addition to Income3Section 2502Section 682

BHARGAB ENGINEERING WORKS,HOWRAH vs. PCIT, CENTRAL KOLKATA 2, , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1161/KOL/2025[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Nov 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263

reassessment order under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 dated 30.03.2023, and the expenditure claimed was required to be disallowed. Therefore, a sum of ₹ 17,03,551/- to be disallowed under section 36(1)(va) of the Act and another sum of ₹ 45,236/-, which was required to be disallowed as per Explanation 1 to sub-section (1) of section

ITO, KOLKATA vs. AJIT KUMAR MINDA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue and cross objections of the\nassessee are dismissed

ITA 2668/KOL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Sept 2025AY 2015-16
Section 10(38)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 68Section 69C

reassessment was upheld.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "Sec. 147", "Sec. 148", "Sec. 10(38)", "Sec. 68", "Sec. 69C", "Sec. 250", "Sec. 234B", "Sec. 234D

MELCO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI (MAHARASHTRA) vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 9(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA (WEST BENGAL)

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1604/KOL/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Oct 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 250Section 68

234D of the Act is wrong and unjustified and Id. CIT (A) has erred in upholding the same by dismissing the appeal of the appellant as unadmitted. (7) Appellant craves leave to add, alter, delete or modify any ground of appeal.” 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessment of the assessee was reopened by issuing notice under