SURJA SEKHAR GANGULY,HOOGHLY vs. ITO, WARD - 17(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 275/KOL/2016[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Oct 2016AY 2005-2006
Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan, J.M. &Dr.A.L.Saini, A.M.)
For Appellant: Shri: Somnath Ghosh, Advocate, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Kumar Kureel, JCIT, ld.DR
Section 10Section 143(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148
17A) the whole of Rs, 3,82,300/- as per" A" above and Rs. 1,38,219/- as expenses out of "B" above.
The records further reflects that no supporting evidences have been filed in this regard neither for the exemption u/s.10(17 A) nor any details of expenses out out of award in foreign currency as mentioned above.
Since
