BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

16 results for “reassessment”+ Section 153Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi402Mumbai221Hyderabad87Chennai80Bangalore69Jaipur63Guwahati38Amritsar38Chandigarh36Patna35Pune33Ahmedabad27Allahabad20Raipur19Kolkata16Agra16Dehradun14Lucknow13Cochin12Visakhapatnam10Cuttack8Nagpur8Rajkot7Surat3Ranchi2Panaji1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 26323Section 153A15Section 14715Limitation/Time-bar14Section 15313Section 143(3)12Section 80H12Section 14810Section 1329Search & Seizure

ARISTOCRAT RESIDENCES LLP ,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 34 (1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1118/KOL/2024[AY-2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm Income Tax Officer, Ward Aristocrat Residences Llp 34(1) 2 Oswal Chambers Church Lane Aaykar Bhavan, Bbd Bagh, Kolkata-700001 Vs. Kolkata-700107 West Bengal West Bengal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aavfa9997R Assessee By : Dr. Kapil Goel, Ar Revenue By : H. Robindro Singh, Dr Date Of Hearing: 06.02.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 01.04.2025

For Appellant: Dr. Kapil Goel, ARFor Respondent: H. Robindro Singh, DR
Section 132Section 139Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 149Section 151Section 153
8
Condonation of Delay7
Revision u/s 2637
Section 153A
Section 153C

153B and section 153C, all other provisions of this Act shall apply to the assessment made under this section; (ii) in an assessment or reassessment

SURESH KUMAR PODDAR,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 63(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1542/KOL/2024[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Mar 2026AY 2011-2012

Bench: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR (Accountant Member)

Section 111ASection 132Section 132(1)Section 139(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 153CSection 250Section 250o

153B and section 153C, all other provisions of this Act shall apply to the assessment made under this section; (ii) in an assessment or reassessment

ACIT, CIRCLE-7.1, KOLKATA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN vs. ITC LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed and both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 745/KOL/2024[1992-1993]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 May 2025AY 1992-1993

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Khaitan &For Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta, DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 151Section 153Section 80H

153B thereof expires on 30th June 2021 due to its extension by earlier notifications, such time-limit shall further stand extended to 30th September 2021. There is no extension of time-limit under this notification for completion of assessment or passing of any order under section 144C(13) of the Act. In our view, therefore, Notification No. 74/2021 is also

ITC LIMITED, KOLKATA. ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT,CIR-7(1),KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed and both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1318/KOL/2023[1993-94]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 May 2025AY 1993-94

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Khaitan &For Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta, DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 151Section 153Section 80H

153B thereof expires on 30th June 2021 due to its extension by earlier notifications, such time-limit shall further stand extended to 30th September 2021. There is no extension of time-limit under this notification for completion of assessment or passing of any order under section 144C(13) of the Act. In our view, therefore, Notification No. 74/2021 is also

ACIT, CIRCLE-7(1), KOLKATA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN vs. ITC LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed and both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 744/KOL/2024[1993-1994]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 May 2025AY 1993-1994

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Khaitan &For Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta, DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 151Section 153Section 80H

153B thereof expires on 30th June 2021 due to its extension by earlier notifications, such time-limit shall further stand extended to 30th September 2021. There is no extension of time-limit under this notification for completion of assessment or passing of any order under section 144C(13) of the Act. In our view, therefore, Notification No. 74/2021 is also

ACIT, CIRCLE-7(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. HI TECH SYSTEMS AND SERVICES LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed and both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1318/KOL/2024[2022-2023]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Jan 2025AY 2022-2023

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Khaitan &For Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta, DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 151Section 153Section 80H

153B thereof expires on 30th June 2021 due to its extension by earlier notifications, such time-limit shall further stand extended to 30th September 2021. There is no extension of time-limit under this notification for completion of assessment or passing of any order under section 144C(13) of the Act. In our view, therefore, Notification No. 74/2021 is also

BASUDEV BANIK ,BENGAL ENAMAL vs. PCIT-5,KOL, KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1035/KOL/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Dec 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 1029 To 1035/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2011-12 To 2017-18 Basudev Banik Pcit -5, Kolkata 2, Ghosh Para Road, Palta Vs P.O.: Bengal Enamel 24 Pargana (N) Pin:- 743122 [Pan: Aakpy3403B] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/R Revenue By : Shri S. Datta, Cit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 14/12/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 19/12/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Bench : The Above Captioned Appeals Are Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Separate But Identical Orders Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-5, (Hereinafter The “Ld. Pr. Cit”), Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Years 2011-12 To 2017-18. 2. The Registry Has Pointed Out That There Is A Delay Of 493 Days In Filing The Present Appeals By The Assessee. The Assessee Has Filed A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Which Is Placed On Record Explaining The Reasons. The Same Is Extracted For Ready Reference:- “I Basudev Banik, Son Of Kartick Chandra Banik Of 2. Ghosh Para Road, Palta, Po: Bengal Enamel. Dist. 24. Parganas (N). Pin: 743122, By Occupation Business, Having Pan No.Ahipb4753G , Do Hereby Solemnly Declare & Affirm As Follows: 1. That I Am Carrying On Trading Business Of Two Wheeler Motor Vehicle Under The Name & Style M/S. Banik Motors.

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/RFor Respondent: Shri S. Datta, CIT, D/R
Section 132Section 132ASection 144Section 153(1)Section 153ASection 153BSection 263

153B. Time limit for completion of assessment under section 153A.—(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 153, the Assessing Officer shall make an order of assessment or reassessment

BASUDEV BANIK,BENGAL ENAMEL vs. PCIT-5, KOL, KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1029/KOL/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Dec 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 1029 To 1035/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2011-12 To 2017-18 Basudev Banik Pcit -5, Kolkata 2, Ghosh Para Road, Palta Vs P.O.: Bengal Enamel 24 Pargana (N) Pin:- 743122 [Pan: Aakpy3403B] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/R Revenue By : Shri S. Datta, Cit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 14/12/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 19/12/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Bench : The Above Captioned Appeals Are Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Separate But Identical Orders Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-5, (Hereinafter The “Ld. Pr. Cit”), Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Years 2011-12 To 2017-18. 2. The Registry Has Pointed Out That There Is A Delay Of 493 Days In Filing The Present Appeals By The Assessee. The Assessee Has Filed A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Which Is Placed On Record Explaining The Reasons. The Same Is Extracted For Ready Reference:- “I Basudev Banik, Son Of Kartick Chandra Banik Of 2. Ghosh Para Road, Palta, Po: Bengal Enamel. Dist. 24. Parganas (N). Pin: 743122, By Occupation Business, Having Pan No.Ahipb4753G , Do Hereby Solemnly Declare & Affirm As Follows: 1. That I Am Carrying On Trading Business Of Two Wheeler Motor Vehicle Under The Name & Style M/S. Banik Motors.

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/RFor Respondent: Shri S. Datta, CIT, D/R
Section 132Section 132ASection 144Section 153(1)Section 153ASection 153BSection 263

153B. Time limit for completion of assessment under section 153A.—(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 153, the Assessing Officer shall make an order of assessment or reassessment

BASUDEV BANIK ,BENGAL ENAMEL vs. PCIT-5, KOL, KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1030/KOL/2023[743122]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Dec 2023

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 1029 To 1035/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2011-12 To 2017-18 Basudev Banik Pcit -5, Kolkata 2, Ghosh Para Road, Palta Vs P.O.: Bengal Enamel 24 Pargana (N) Pin:- 743122 [Pan: Aakpy3403B] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/R Revenue By : Shri S. Datta, Cit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 14/12/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 19/12/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Bench : The Above Captioned Appeals Are Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Separate But Identical Orders Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-5, (Hereinafter The “Ld. Pr. Cit”), Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Years 2011-12 To 2017-18. 2. The Registry Has Pointed Out That There Is A Delay Of 493 Days In Filing The Present Appeals By The Assessee. The Assessee Has Filed A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Which Is Placed On Record Explaining The Reasons. The Same Is Extracted For Ready Reference:- “I Basudev Banik, Son Of Kartick Chandra Banik Of 2. Ghosh Para Road, Palta, Po: Bengal Enamel. Dist. 24. Parganas (N). Pin: 743122, By Occupation Business, Having Pan No.Ahipb4753G , Do Hereby Solemnly Declare & Affirm As Follows: 1. That I Am Carrying On Trading Business Of Two Wheeler Motor Vehicle Under The Name & Style M/S. Banik Motors.

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/RFor Respondent: Shri S. Datta, CIT, D/R
Section 132Section 132ASection 144Section 153(1)Section 153ASection 153BSection 263

153B. Time limit for completion of assessment under section 153A.—(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 153, the Assessing Officer shall make an order of assessment or reassessment

BASUDEV BANIK,BENGAL ENAMEL. vs. PCIT-5,KOLKATA., KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1031/KOL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Dec 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 1029 To 1035/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2011-12 To 2017-18 Basudev Banik Pcit -5, Kolkata 2, Ghosh Para Road, Palta Vs P.O.: Bengal Enamel 24 Pargana (N) Pin:- 743122 [Pan: Aakpy3403B] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/R Revenue By : Shri S. Datta, Cit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 14/12/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 19/12/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Bench : The Above Captioned Appeals Are Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Separate But Identical Orders Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-5, (Hereinafter The “Ld. Pr. Cit”), Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Years 2011-12 To 2017-18. 2. The Registry Has Pointed Out That There Is A Delay Of 493 Days In Filing The Present Appeals By The Assessee. The Assessee Has Filed A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Which Is Placed On Record Explaining The Reasons. The Same Is Extracted For Ready Reference:- “I Basudev Banik, Son Of Kartick Chandra Banik Of 2. Ghosh Para Road, Palta, Po: Bengal Enamel. Dist. 24. Parganas (N). Pin: 743122, By Occupation Business, Having Pan No.Ahipb4753G , Do Hereby Solemnly Declare & Affirm As Follows: 1. That I Am Carrying On Trading Business Of Two Wheeler Motor Vehicle Under The Name & Style M/S. Banik Motors.

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/RFor Respondent: Shri S. Datta, CIT, D/R
Section 132Section 132ASection 144Section 153(1)Section 153ASection 153BSection 263

153B. Time limit for completion of assessment under section 153A.—(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 153, the Assessing Officer shall make an order of assessment or reassessment

BASUDEV BANIK,BENGAL ENAMEL vs. PCIT-5, KOLKATA., KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1032/KOL/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Dec 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 1029 To 1035/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2011-12 To 2017-18 Basudev Banik Pcit -5, Kolkata 2, Ghosh Para Road, Palta Vs P.O.: Bengal Enamel 24 Pargana (N) Pin:- 743122 [Pan: Aakpy3403B] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/R Revenue By : Shri S. Datta, Cit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 14/12/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 19/12/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Bench : The Above Captioned Appeals Are Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Separate But Identical Orders Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-5, (Hereinafter The “Ld. Pr. Cit”), Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Years 2011-12 To 2017-18. 2. The Registry Has Pointed Out That There Is A Delay Of 493 Days In Filing The Present Appeals By The Assessee. The Assessee Has Filed A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Which Is Placed On Record Explaining The Reasons. The Same Is Extracted For Ready Reference:- “I Basudev Banik, Son Of Kartick Chandra Banik Of 2. Ghosh Para Road, Palta, Po: Bengal Enamel. Dist. 24. Parganas (N). Pin: 743122, By Occupation Business, Having Pan No.Ahipb4753G , Do Hereby Solemnly Declare & Affirm As Follows: 1. That I Am Carrying On Trading Business Of Two Wheeler Motor Vehicle Under The Name & Style M/S. Banik Motors.

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/RFor Respondent: Shri S. Datta, CIT, D/R
Section 132Section 132ASection 144Section 153(1)Section 153ASection 153BSection 263

153B. Time limit for completion of assessment under section 153A.—(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 153, the Assessing Officer shall make an order of assessment or reassessment

BASUDEV BANIK,BENGAL ENAMEL vs. PCIT-5, KOL, KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1033/KOL/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Dec 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 1029 To 1035/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2011-12 To 2017-18 Basudev Banik Pcit -5, Kolkata 2, Ghosh Para Road, Palta Vs P.O.: Bengal Enamel 24 Pargana (N) Pin:- 743122 [Pan: Aakpy3403B] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/R Revenue By : Shri S. Datta, Cit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 14/12/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 19/12/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Bench : The Above Captioned Appeals Are Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Separate But Identical Orders Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-5, (Hereinafter The “Ld. Pr. Cit”), Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Years 2011-12 To 2017-18. 2. The Registry Has Pointed Out That There Is A Delay Of 493 Days In Filing The Present Appeals By The Assessee. The Assessee Has Filed A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Which Is Placed On Record Explaining The Reasons. The Same Is Extracted For Ready Reference:- “I Basudev Banik, Son Of Kartick Chandra Banik Of 2. Ghosh Para Road, Palta, Po: Bengal Enamel. Dist. 24. Parganas (N). Pin: 743122, By Occupation Business, Having Pan No.Ahipb4753G , Do Hereby Solemnly Declare & Affirm As Follows: 1. That I Am Carrying On Trading Business Of Two Wheeler Motor Vehicle Under The Name & Style M/S. Banik Motors.

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/RFor Respondent: Shri S. Datta, CIT, D/R
Section 132Section 132ASection 144Section 153(1)Section 153ASection 153BSection 263

153B. Time limit for completion of assessment under section 153A.—(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 153, the Assessing Officer shall make an order of assessment or reassessment

BASUDEV BANIK ,BENGAL ENAMEL. vs. PCIT-5, KOL, KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1034/KOL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Dec 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 1029 To 1035/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2011-12 To 2017-18 Basudev Banik Pcit -5, Kolkata 2, Ghosh Para Road, Palta Vs P.O.: Bengal Enamel 24 Pargana (N) Pin:- 743122 [Pan: Aakpy3403B] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/R Revenue By : Shri S. Datta, Cit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 14/12/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 19/12/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Bench : The Above Captioned Appeals Are Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Separate But Identical Orders Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-5, (Hereinafter The “Ld. Pr. Cit”), Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Years 2011-12 To 2017-18. 2. The Registry Has Pointed Out That There Is A Delay Of 493 Days In Filing The Present Appeals By The Assessee. The Assessee Has Filed A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Which Is Placed On Record Explaining The Reasons. The Same Is Extracted For Ready Reference:- “I Basudev Banik, Son Of Kartick Chandra Banik Of 2. Ghosh Para Road, Palta, Po: Bengal Enamel. Dist. 24. Parganas (N). Pin: 743122, By Occupation Business, Having Pan No.Ahipb4753G , Do Hereby Solemnly Declare & Affirm As Follows: 1. That I Am Carrying On Trading Business Of Two Wheeler Motor Vehicle Under The Name & Style M/S. Banik Motors.

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/RFor Respondent: Shri S. Datta, CIT, D/R
Section 132Section 132ASection 144Section 153(1)Section 153ASection 153BSection 263

153B. Time limit for completion of assessment under section 153A.—(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 153, the Assessing Officer shall make an order of assessment or reassessment

M/S. ROSEWOOD MERCANTILE PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 3(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 581/KOL/2022[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Jan 2025AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri C. Roy, ARFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Kishore, CIT DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 263

reassessment proceedings, the ld. AO issued notice u/s 133(6) of the Act to the 9 out of 20 subscribers and completed the assessment vide order dated 30.04.2012. According to the PCIT, notices u/s 133(6) of the Act were not served through postal services. In reply to notices u/s 133(6) of the Act, all replies were received

M/S. ROSEWOOD MERCANTILE PVT. LTD..,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD-3(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 582/KOL/2022[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Jan 2025AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri C. Roy, ARFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Kishore, CIT DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 263

reassessment proceedings, the ld. AO issued notice u/s 133(6) of the Act to the 9 out of 20 subscribers and completed the assessment vide order dated 30.04.2012. According to the PCIT, notices u/s 133(6) of the Act were not served through postal services. In reply to notices u/s 133(6) of the Act, all replies were received

M/S. PHILIPS INDIA LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 12(2), , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 2308/KOL/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Feb 2023AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawali.T.A. No.2308/Kol/2019 Assessment Year: 2004-05 M/S Philips India Limited.….............……….........…..........….…… Appellant 3Rd Floor, Tower A, Dlf Park, 08 Block Af, Major Arterial Road, New Town (Rajarhat), Kolkata-700156. [Pan: Aabcp9487A] Vs. Acit, Circle-12(2), Kolkata.......….....……........…...…...…..…..... Respondent Appearances By: Shri Ketan K Ved, Ca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Amal Kamat, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : November 17, 2022 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : February 06, 2023 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 31.07.2019 Of The Assessing Officer (In Short The ‘A.O’) Passed U/S 92Ca(3) & 144C Read With Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) In Pursuance Of The Directions Of The Dispute Resolution Panel (Drp) Dated 14.05.2019. 2. At The Outset, The Ld. Counsel For The Assessee Has Submitted That The Impugned Assessment Order Framed By The Assessing Officer Is Null & Void Being Framed Without Passing Of Draft Assessment Order. That The Assessing Officer Without Passing Of Draft Assessment Order & Without Giving Opportunity To The Assessee To File Objections Against The Said Draft Assessment Order As Per Provisions To Section 144C Of The

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 144C(5)Section 274Section 92C

153B], the assessment without providing any further opportunity of being heard to the assessee, within one month from the end of the month in which such direction is received." 6. A perusal of the aforesaid provision would show that the Assessing Officer before passing of the final assessment order is mandatorily required to forward a draft of the proposed order