GOPAL KUNDU ROY,SILIGURI vs. ITO, WARD 1(3),, SILIGURI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 2263/KOL/2025[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2014-2015
Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) I.T.A. No. 2263/Kol/2025 Assessment Year: 2014-2015 Gopal Kundu Roy,……………………………….…Appellant ‘Hare Krishna Bhawan’, P.O. Rabindra Sarani, Rathkhola Bazar, Siliguri-734006, West Bengal [Pan:Acgpr0359H] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,……………………………..Respondent Ward-1(3), Siliguri, Aayakar Bhawan, Paribahan Nagar, Matigara, Dist. Darjeeling-734010, W.B.
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 54F
u/s. 148 Rs.3,12,447/- plus Rs.13,18,901/- (stamp duty
Rs.15,09,374/- minus Rs.1,90,473/- as cost of acquisition)] and initiated penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act in respect of concealed the particulars of income.
2
Gopal Kundu Roy
3. On being aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(Appeals
