BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 36(1)(VA)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai59Ahmedabad59Bangalore38Delhi36Jaipur31Indore18Raipur10Chandigarh6Pune6Lucknow4Rajkot4Surat3Hyderabad3Kolkata3Amritsar3Jodhpur1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 14A4Section 271(1)(c)3Section 143(3)3Section 2(24)2Disallowance2Addition to Income2

A.C.I.T., CC-1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S BHASKAR TEA & INDUSTRIES LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 1992/KOL/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 May 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri P.M.Jagtap & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Raviassessment Year:2004-05

Section 143(3)Section 2(24)Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(21)(va)Section 43B

u/s. 43B r.w.s 36(1)(va) of the Act. The AO initiated the penalty proceedings for not considering the amount of ITA No.1992/Kol/2016 A.Y. 2004-05 ACIT CC-1(1) Kol. Vs. M/s Bhaskar Tea & Inds. Ltd. Page 2 ₹80,56,794/- in its computation of income. The assessee contested the penalty proceedings by pleading that by inadvertently the said

ORIENT PAPER & INDUSTRIES LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. J.C.I.T RANGE - 6,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal in ITA 430/Kol/2013 of assessee is partly allowed and appeal in ITA 648/Kol/2013 of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 430/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Aug 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: : Shri P.M.Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Asim Chaudhury, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Niraj Kumar, CIT, ld.Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 14A

penalty for tax withholding lapse per se is separately provided for in Section 271 C, and, section 40(a)(ia) does not add to the same. The provisions of Section 40 a)(ia1 as they' existed prior to insertion of second proviso thereto, went much beyond the obvious intentions of the lawmakers and created undue hardships even in cases

PRIYO GOPAL BISHOYI GRANDSON,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-44, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1818/KOL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 133A

Va lue of the value of Cas ti ng physi ca l Pr ofi t st ock st ock a s per mi sta ke value of ele men t inven t ory MR P /se lli ng ma de i n st ock a s on s u ch arrived at price tota llin