BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 36(1)(VA)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai44Delhi21Jaipur17Ahmedabad12Indore11Raipur10Pune6Chandigarh6Kolkata3Lucknow3Rajkot3Hyderabad2Surat1Bangalore1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 689Section 271(1)(c)6Section 143(3)3Section 1473Section 1483Penalty3Double Taxation/DTAA3Addition to Income3

BMW INDUSTRIES LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2587/KOL/2025[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2026AY 2016-2017
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 68

36(1)(va) of the Act of ₹33,33,704/- on account of delayed payment of PF and ESI and the penalty was initiated for concealment of income. The Id. AO accordingly imposed penalty of ₹1 ,47 ,93,284/- being 100% of the tax sought to be evaded.\n8. The Id. CIT (A) in the appellate proceedings affirmed the order

BMW INDUSTRIES LIMITED ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2586/KOL/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2026AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 68

36(1)(va) of the Act of ₹33,33,704/- on account of delayed\npayment of PF and ESI and the penalty was initiated for concealment\nof income. The Id. AO accordingly imposed penalty of ₹1 ,47 ,93,284/-\nbeing 100% of the tax sought to be evaded.\n8.\nThe Id. CIT (A) in the appellate proceedings affirmed the order

BMW INDUSTRIES LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2585/KOL/2025[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2026AY 2012-2013
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 68

36(1)(va) of the Act of ₹33,33,704/- on account of delayed\npayment of PF and ESI and the penalty was initiated for concealment\nof income. The Id. AO accordingly imposed penalty of ₹1 ,47 ,93,284/-\nbeing 100% of the tax sought to be evaded.\n8. The Id. CIT (A) in the appellate proceedings affirmed the order