BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 35Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi66Mumbai63Raipur17Ahmedabad13Hyderabad5Pune5Kolkata4Jaipur1Amritsar1SC1

Key Topics

Section 316Section 143(3)5Section 271(1)(c)4Disallowance4Section 271(1)3Penalty3Addition to Income3Depreciation3Section 37(1)

ACIT, CIR-40, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S DEEPAK CONSTRUCTION CO., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of revenue is dismissed

ITA 179/KOL/2014[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Feb 2017AY 2006-2007

Bench: : Shri M.Balaganesh & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 40

section of 271 (1)( c) of the Act, there has to be concealment of particulars of income and secondly the assessee must have furnished inaccurate particulars of income. In the instant case, these two conditions are found missing. Additions made by the AO and a part of it confirmed by the CIT(A) are all based on estimates where nothing

ADDL.CIT, RANGE - 7, KOLKATA vs. OSD COKE PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of revenue are dismissed

2
Section 322
Deduction2
ITA 1874/KOL/2008[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Feb 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Appellant: Shri P. B. Pramanik, JCITFor Respondent: S/Shri J. P. Khaitan & J. M. Thard, Advocates
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 31Section 32Section 37(1)

Penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) of I. T. Act are initiated for furnishing inaccurate particulars of total income on this issue.” Aggrieved against the action of AO in both the years, assessee went in appeal before CIT(A), who allowed the claim of the assessee and the relevant finding given

ITO, WARD - 7(2), KOLKATA vs. OSD COKE PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of revenue are dismissed

ITA 1873/KOL/2008[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Feb 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Appellant: Shri P. B. Pramanik, JCITFor Respondent: S/Shri J. P. Khaitan & J. M. Thard, Advocates
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 31Section 32Section 37(1)

Penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) of I. T. Act are initiated for furnishing inaccurate particulars of total income on this issue.” Aggrieved against the action of AO in both the years, assessee went in appeal before CIT(A), who allowed the claim of the assessee and the relevant finding given

WEST BENGAL STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -2, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, ITA No. 1761& 1762/Kol/2011 are allowed and ITA No

ITA 1761/KOL/2011[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 May 2016AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Appellant: Shri T. P. Kar, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Sallong Yaden, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 254Section 35D

35D of the Act does not provide amortization of expenses which are capital in nature. Accordingly, we confirm the order of CIT(A) and this issue of assessee’s appeal is dismissed. 8. The next common issue in ITA No. 1763&1762/Kol/2011 for AY 2005-06 and 2007-08 is as regards to the order of CIT(A) disallowing leave