BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

19 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 271A(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi21Jaipur20Chennai20Kolkata19Mumbai16Rajkot15Bangalore13Ahmedabad12Indore12Hyderabad9Visakhapatnam6Raipur6Pune4Surat3Nagpur3Chandigarh2Amritsar2Guwahati1Jabalpur1Allahabad1Varanasi1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 14825Section 271A21Section 14721Section 15120Addition to Income16Section 133A15Section 2412Section 271B11Survey u/s 133A

AMIT KHEMKA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 43(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 635/KOL/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

For Appellant: Shri Vikash Kumar Agarwal, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kumar Pati, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 250Section 271BSection 68

D E R PER BENCH: Both these appeals filed by the assessee are against the separate orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)”] passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) vide Order Nos. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 24/1060387478(1

11
Section 27410
Penalty10
TDS5

AMIT KHEMKA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 43(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 636/KOL/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

For Appellant: Shri Vikash Kumar Agarwal, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kumar Pati, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 250Section 271BSection 68

D E R PER BENCH: Both these appeals filed by the assessee are against the separate orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)”] passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) vide Order Nos. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 24/1060387478(1

TARAI TRANSPORT CORPORATION,SILIGURI vs. JCIT, RANGE-1, SILIGURI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 273/KOL/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 269SSection 271Section 271D

271A, section 271AA, section 271B, section 271BA, section 271BB, section 271C, section 271CA, section 271D, section 271E, section 271F, section 271FA, section 271FAB, section 271FB, section 271G, section 271GA, section 271GB, section 271H, section 271-I, section 271J, clause (c) or clause (d) of sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) of section 272A, sub-section (1) of section 272AA

ANUNOY MUKHERJEE,DURGAPUR vs. I.T.O., WARD-1(4), DURGAPUR, DURGAPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 555/KOL/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Feb 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 555/Kol/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Anunoy Mukherjee Income Tax Officer, Ward-1 Vs (4), Durgapur Near Hdfc Bank Bamunara Kanksa Durgapur - 713212 [Pan : Cydpm3295A] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Vishal Kr. Agrawal, C.A. & Shri Rohitash Gupta, C.A. Revenue By : Shri P.P. Barman, Addl. Cit, Sr. D/R सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 16/02/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 23/02/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dated 21/07/2022, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’), For Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. The Registry Has Pointed Out That There Is A Delay Of One (1) Day In Filing Of This Appeal In Time Before The Tribunal. The Assessee Has Filed A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Stating The Reasons Of Delay. After Perusing The Same, We Find That The Assessee Was Prevented By Sufficient Cause From Filing The Appeal In Time Before The Tribunal. Hence, The Delay Is Condoned & The Appeal Is Admitted. 3. The Only Issue That Arises For Our Consideration Is Whether The Ld. Cit(A) Was Justified In Confirming The Penalty U/S 271B Of The Act At Rs.1,36,214/-, Levied For Not Getting The Books Of Account Audited U/S 44Ab Of The Act.

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kr. Agrawal, C.A. & ShriFor Respondent: Shri P.P. Barman, Addl. CIT, Sr. D/R
Section 194CSection 250Section 271Section 271ASection 271BSection 271CSection 271DSection 271ESection 271FSection 271G

271A, [ section 271AA,] section 271B [section 271BA], [ section 271BB,] section 271C, [ section 271CA,] section 271D, section 271E, [ section 271F, [ section 271FA,] [ section 271FAB,] [ section 271FB,] [ section 271G,]] [ section 271GA,] [ section 271GB,] [ section 271H,] [ section 271-I,] [ section 271J,] clause (c) or clause (d) of sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) of section 272A, sub-section (1) of section 272AA

MADINA RICE MILL PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIR. 4(4) , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 805/KOL/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Sept 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kapil Mondal, DR
Section 133ASection 145(3)Section 148Section 271ASection 273BSection 274

D E R PER BENCH: These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the orders of Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kolkata-27 [learned CIT (A)] even dated 15th February, 2024 for A.Ys. 2013-14 to 2017-18, which are arising from the penalty under 271A of the Act framed by ld. ACIT Central Circle

MADINA RICE MILL PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CEN. CIR. 4(4), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 806/KOL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kapil Mondal, DR
Section 133ASection 145(3)Section 148Section 271ASection 273BSection 274

D E R PER BENCH: These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the orders of Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kolkata-27 [learned CIT (A)] even dated 15th February, 2024 for A.Ys. 2013-14 to 2017-18, which are arising from the penalty under 271A of the Act framed by ld. ACIT Central Circle

MADINA RICE MILL PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CEN. CIR. 4(4), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 802/KOL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Sept 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kapil Mondal, DR
Section 133ASection 145(3)Section 148Section 271ASection 273BSection 274

D E R PER BENCH: These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the orders of Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kolkata-27 [learned CIT (A)] even dated 15th February, 2024 for A.Ys. 2013-14 to 2017-18, which are arising from the penalty under 271A of the Act framed by ld. ACIT Central Circle

MADINA RICE MILL PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(4), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 803/KOL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kapil Mondal, DR
Section 133ASection 145(3)Section 148Section 271ASection 273BSection 274

D E R PER BENCH: These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the orders of Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kolkata-27 [learned CIT (A)] even dated 15th February, 2024 for A.Ys. 2013-14 to 2017-18, which are arising from the penalty under 271A of the Act framed by ld. ACIT Central Circle

MADINA RICE MILL PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR. 4(4), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 804/KOL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Sept 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kapil Mondal, DR
Section 133ASection 145(3)Section 148Section 271ASection 273BSection 274

D E R PER BENCH: These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the orders of Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kolkata-27 [learned CIT (A)] even dated 15th February, 2024 for A.Ys. 2013-14 to 2017-18, which are arising from the penalty under 271A of the Act framed by ld. ACIT Central Circle

ANITA BASAK,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CC 1(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2174/KOL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm Anita Basak Acit, Central Circle 1(1), C/O. S.N. Ghosh & Associates, Kolkata, Advocates, Aaykar Bhawan Poorva, 2, Garstin Place, 2 Nd Floor, Suite 110 Shanti Pally, 5 Th Floor, Vs. No.203, Off Hare Street, Kolkata, Eastern Metropolitian By Pass, West Bengal-700001, Kolkata-700107, West Bengal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Ahhpb5785B Assessee By : Shri Somnath Ghosh, Ar Revenue By : Shri Ruchika Sharma, Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 19.12.2025

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ruchika Sharma, DR
Section 1Section 133Section 143(3)Section 144Section 144ASection 145(3)Section 270ASection 271Section 271ASection 44A

D E R Per Rajesh Kumar, AM: This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the penalty order u/s 271A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) vide order dated 25.03.2022 by Central Circle 1(1), Kolkata for A.Y. 2018-19. 2. The only issue raised by the assessee in various grounds of appeal is against the order

RUNGTA IRRIGATION LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. A.C.I.T., CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(1), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the revenue stand dismissed

ITA 2316/KOL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm]

Section 133ASection 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151

D” BENCH, KOLKATA [Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, AM & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, JM] I.T.A. No. 2257/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2012-13 & I.T.A. No. 2315/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2013-14 & I.T.A. No. 2303/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2014-15 & I.T.A. No. 2316/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Rungta Irrigation Ltd. Vs. ACIT, Central Circle-3(1), Kolkata 101, Pragati Tower, 26, Rajendra Place, Delhi

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. RUNGTA IRRIGATION LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the revenue stand dismissed

ITA 2400/KOL/2024[2014]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 May 2025

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm]

Section 133ASection 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151

D” BENCH, KOLKATA [Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, AM & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, JM] I.T.A. No. 2257/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2012-13 & I.T.A. No. 2315/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2013-14 & I.T.A. No. 2303/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2014-15 & I.T.A. No. 2316/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Rungta Irrigation Ltd. Vs. ACIT, Central Circle-3(1), Kolkata 101, Pragati Tower, 26, Rajendra Place, Delhi

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. RUNGTA IRRIGATION LIMITED, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the revenue stand dismissed

ITA 2399/KOL/2024[2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 May 2025

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm]

Section 133ASection 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151

D” BENCH, KOLKATA [Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, AM & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, JM] I.T.A. No. 2257/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2012-13 & I.T.A. No. 2315/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2013-14 & I.T.A. No. 2303/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2014-15 & I.T.A. No. 2316/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Rungta Irrigation Ltd. Vs. ACIT, Central Circle-3(1), Kolkata 101, Pragati Tower, 26, Rajendra Place, Delhi

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. RUNGTA IRRIGATION LTD, NEW DEHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the revenue stand dismissed

ITA 2401/KOL/2024[2015]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 May 2025

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm]

Section 133ASection 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151

D” BENCH, KOLKATA [Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, AM & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, JM] I.T.A. No. 2257/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2012-13 & I.T.A. No. 2315/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2013-14 & I.T.A. No. 2303/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2014-15 & I.T.A. No. 2316/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Rungta Irrigation Ltd. Vs. ACIT, Central Circle-3(1), Kolkata 101, Pragati Tower, 26, Rajendra Place, Delhi

RUNGTA IRRIGATION LIMITED,DELHI vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(1)/KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the revenue stand dismissed

ITA 2257/KOL/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 May 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm]

Section 133ASection 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151

D” BENCH, KOLKATA [Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, AM & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, JM] I.T.A. No. 2257/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2012-13 & I.T.A. No. 2315/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2013-14 & I.T.A. No. 2303/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2014-15 & I.T.A. No. 2316/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Rungta Irrigation Ltd. Vs. ACIT, Central Circle-3(1), Kolkata 101, Pragati Tower, 26, Rajendra Place, Delhi

VINEET BAJORIA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 45(4), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 228/KOL/2025[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Sept 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: S/Shri & Rajesh Kumar & Pradip Kumar Choubeyita Nos.228, 229, 230 & 231/Kol/2025 Assessment Year : 2013-14 Vineet Bajoria, C/O. S.N.Ghosh Vs. Ito, Ward 45(4), Kolkata & Associates, Advocates, 2, Garstin Place, 2Nd Floor, Suite No.203, Off Hare Street, Kolkata Pan/Gir No. Adupb 1299 F (Appellant) .. ( Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Somnath Ghosh, Adv Revenue By : Shri S.B.Chakraborthy, Sr Dr

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, AdvFor Respondent: Shri S.B.Chakraborthy, Sr DR
Section 24Section 80CSection 80DSection 80T

D E R PER: RAJESH KUMAR, AM ITA No.228/Kol/2025: Asst.Year: 2013-14 This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NAFC), New Delhi NFAC), Delhi dated 26.11.2024 in Appeal No.NFAC/2012- 13/10038647 passed for Assessment Year 2013-14. P a g e 1 | 10 ITA Nos.228

VINEET BAJORIA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 45(4), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 231/KOL/2025[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Sept 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: S/Shri & Rajesh Kumar & Pradip Kumar Choubeyita Nos.228, 229, 230 & 231/Kol/2025 Assessment Year : 2013-14 Vineet Bajoria, C/O. S.N.Ghosh Vs. Ito, Ward 45(4), Kolkata & Associates, Advocates, 2, Garstin Place, 2Nd Floor, Suite No.203, Off Hare Street, Kolkata Pan/Gir No. Adupb 1299 F (Appellant) .. ( Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Somnath Ghosh, Adv Revenue By : Shri S.B.Chakraborthy, Sr Dr

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, AdvFor Respondent: Shri S.B.Chakraborthy, Sr DR
Section 24Section 80CSection 80DSection 80T

D E R PER: RAJESH KUMAR, AM ITA No.228/Kol/2025: Asst.Year: 2013-14 This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NAFC), New Delhi NFAC), Delhi dated 26.11.2024 in Appeal No.NFAC/2012- 13/10038647 passed for Assessment Year 2013-14. P a g e 1 | 10 ITA Nos.228

VINEET BAJORIA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 45(4), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 229/KOL/2025[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Sept 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: S/Shri & Rajesh Kumar & Pradip Kumar Choubeyita Nos.228, 229, 230 & 231/Kol/2025 Assessment Year : 2013-14 Vineet Bajoria, C/O. S.N.Ghosh Vs. Ito, Ward 45(4), Kolkata & Associates, Advocates, 2, Garstin Place, 2Nd Floor, Suite No.203, Off Hare Street, Kolkata Pan/Gir No. Adupb 1299 F (Appellant) .. ( Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Somnath Ghosh, Adv Revenue By : Shri S.B.Chakraborthy, Sr Dr

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, AdvFor Respondent: Shri S.B.Chakraborthy, Sr DR
Section 24Section 80CSection 80DSection 80T

D E R PER: RAJESH KUMAR, AM ITA No.228/Kol/2025: Asst.Year: 2013-14 This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NAFC), New Delhi NFAC), Delhi dated 26.11.2024 in Appeal No.NFAC/2012- 13/10038647 passed for Assessment Year 2013-14. P a g e 1 | 10 ITA Nos.228

VINEET BAJORIA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 45(4), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 230/KOL/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri & Rajesh Kumar & Pradip Kumar Choubeyita Nos.228, 229, 230 & 231/Kol/2025 Assessment Year : 2013-14 Vineet Bajoria, C/O. S.N.Ghosh Vs. Ito, Ward 45(4), Kolkata & Associates, Advocates, 2, Garstin Place, 2Nd Floor, Suite No.203, Off Hare Street, Kolkata Pan/Gir No. Adupb 1299 F (Appellant) .. ( Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Somnath Ghosh, Adv Revenue By : Shri S.B.Chakraborthy, Sr Dr

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, AdvFor Respondent: Shri S.B.Chakraborthy, Sr DR
Section 24Section 80CSection 80DSection 80T

D E R PER: RAJESH KUMAR, AM ITA No.228/Kol/2025: Asst.Year: 2013-14 This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NAFC), New Delhi NFAC), Delhi dated 26.11.2024 in Appeal No.NFAC/2012- 13/10038647 passed for Assessment Year 2013-14. P a g e 1 | 10 ITA Nos.228