BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

30 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 271A(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai79Indore60Bangalore49Chennai40Jaipur38Delhi36Kolkata30Lucknow21Karnataka21Ahmedabad19Hyderabad18Rajkot15Visakhapatnam6Pune6Raipur6Amritsar6Panaji5SC4Surat3Nagpur3Jodhpur2Chandigarh2Agra1Jabalpur1Guwahati1Cochin1Varanasi1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 271A46Section 14825Section 14721Section 15120Addition to Income20Penalty20Section 133A15Section 143(3)13Section 2412

AMIT KHEMKA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 43(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 636/KOL/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

For Appellant: Shri Vikash Kumar Agarwal, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kumar Pati, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 250Section 271BSection 68

D E R PER BENCH: Both these appeals filed by the assessee are against the separate orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)”] passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) vide Order Nos. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 24/1060387478(1

Showing 1–20 of 30 · Page 1 of 2

Section 271(1)(b)12
Survey u/s 133A11
TDS7

AMIT KHEMKA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 43(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 635/KOL/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

For Appellant: Shri Vikash Kumar Agarwal, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kumar Pati, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 250Section 271BSection 68

D E R PER BENCH: Both these appeals filed by the assessee are against the separate orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)”] passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) vide Order Nos. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 24/1060387478(1

DR. MURARI MOHAN KOLEY,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WD-55(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 559/KOL/2014[2004-2005]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Mar 2017AY 2004-2005

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

271A, 73[section section (1) 271, section 271AA,] section 271B73[, section 271BA], 74[section 271C, 75[section 271BB,] section 271CA,] section 271D, section 271E, 76[section 271F, 77[section 271FA,] 78[section 271FAB,]79[section 271FB,] 80[section 271G,]] 81[section 271GA,] 81a[section 271GB,] 82[section 271H,] 83[section 271-I,] clause (c) or clause (d) of sub-section

SMT. BARNALI BANERJEE,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-31(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 2655/KOL/2013[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Aug 2016AY 2005-2006

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(2)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)Section 69

271A, [section 271AA] section 271B, [section 271BA] [section 271F,] [section 71FA,] [section 271FAB,] [section 271FB,] [section 271G,] [section 271GA,] [section 271GB,] [section 271H,] [section 271-I,] clause (c) or clause (d) of sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) of section 272A, sub-section (1) of section 272AA] or [section 272B, or] [sub- section (1) [or sub-section

SMT. BARNALI BANERJEE,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-31(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 2656/KOL/2013[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Aug 2016AY 2005-2006

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(2)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)Section 69

271A, [section 271AA] section 271B, [section 271BA] [section 271F,] [section 71FA,] [section 271FAB,] [section 271FB,] [section 271G,] [section 271GA,] [section 271GB,] [section 271H,] [section 271-I,] clause (c) or clause (d) of sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) of section 272A, sub-section (1) of section 272AA] or [section 272B, or] [sub- section (1) [or sub-section

BARNALI BANERJEE,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-31(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 2654/KOL/2013[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Aug 2016AY 2005-2006

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(2)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)Section 69

271A, [section 271AA] section 271B, [section 271BA] [section 271F,] [section 71FA,] [section 271FAB,] [section 271FB,] [section 271G,] [section 271GA,] [section 271GB,] [section 271H,] [section 271-I,] clause (c) or clause (d) of sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) of section 272A, sub-section (1) of section 272AA] or [section 272B, or] [sub- section (1) [or sub-section

TARAI TRANSPORT CORPORATION,SILIGURI vs. JCIT, RANGE-1, SILIGURI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 273/KOL/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jun 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 269SSection 271Section 271D

271A, section 271AA, section 271B, section 271BA, section 271BB, section 271C, section 271CA, section 271D, section 271E, section 271F, section 271FA, section 271FAB, section 271FB, section 271G, section 271GA, section 271GB, section 271H, section 271-I, section 271J, clause (c) or clause (d) of sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) of section 272A, sub-section (1) of section 272AA

ANUNOY MUKHERJEE,DURGAPUR vs. I.T.O., WARD-1(4), DURGAPUR, DURGAPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 555/KOL/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Feb 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 555/Kol/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Anunoy Mukherjee Income Tax Officer, Ward-1 Vs (4), Durgapur Near Hdfc Bank Bamunara Kanksa Durgapur - 713212 [Pan : Cydpm3295A] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Vishal Kr. Agrawal, C.A. & Shri Rohitash Gupta, C.A. Revenue By : Shri P.P. Barman, Addl. Cit, Sr. D/R सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 16/02/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 23/02/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dated 21/07/2022, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’), For Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. The Registry Has Pointed Out That There Is A Delay Of One (1) Day In Filing Of This Appeal In Time Before The Tribunal. The Assessee Has Filed A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Stating The Reasons Of Delay. After Perusing The Same, We Find That The Assessee Was Prevented By Sufficient Cause From Filing The Appeal In Time Before The Tribunal. Hence, The Delay Is Condoned & The Appeal Is Admitted. 3. The Only Issue That Arises For Our Consideration Is Whether The Ld. Cit(A) Was Justified In Confirming The Penalty U/S 271B Of The Act At Rs.1,36,214/-, Levied For Not Getting The Books Of Account Audited U/S 44Ab Of The Act.

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kr. Agrawal, C.A. & ShriFor Respondent: Shri P.P. Barman, Addl. CIT, Sr. D/R
Section 194CSection 250Section 271Section 271ASection 271BSection 271CSection 271DSection 271ESection 271FSection 271G

271A, [ section 271AA,] section 271B [section 271BA], [ section 271BB,] section 271C, [ section 271CA,] section 271D, section 271E, [ section 271F, [ section 271FA,] [ section 271FAB,] [ section 271FB,] [ section 271G,]] [ section 271GA,] [ section 271GB,] [ section 271H,] [ section 271-I,] [ section 271J,] clause (c) or clause (d) of sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) of section 272A, sub-section (1) of section 272AA

M/S MUKHERJEE ENTERPRISE,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O WD - 33(3),KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 401/KOL/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2004-05 M/S Mukherjee Enterprise, V/S. Income Tax Officer, 63/4, Harish Chatterjee Ward-33(3), 10B, Street, Kolkta-700 025 Middleton Row, [Pan No.Aaffm 1374 C] Kolkata - 700071 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 271ASection 274

D E R PER Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member:- This appeal by the assessee is arising out of order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XIX, Kolkata in appeal No.28/CIT(A)-XIX/Wd- 33(3)/Kol/12-13 dated 14.01.2013. Assessment was framed by ITO Ward- 33(3), Kolkata u/s 143(3)/145(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred

M/S R. K. MONDAL & BROTHERS,BURDWAN vs. ITO, WD-1(1), DURGAPUR, DURGAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee (in ITA

ITA 1145/KOL/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Jan 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.1145 & 1146/Kol/2016 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11) M/S. R.K. Mondal & Vs. I.T.O, W-1(1), Durgapur Brothers Aayakar Bithi, City Centre, Vill + P.O: Kajora Gram, Durgapur, Durgapur – 713216. Dist. Burdwan, Pin-713338. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aahfr 6294 C (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant By :Shri U. Dasgupta, Advocate Respondent By :Shri G.H. Seema, Addl. Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 15/01/2018 घोषणाकीतारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 25/01/2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am: These Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2010-11, Are Directed Against Orders Passed By The Cit(A)- Durgapur, In Appeal No.146/147/Cit(A)/Dgp/2012-13, Dated 18.02.2016, Which In Turn Arises Out Of Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer U/S 271A & 271(1)(B) Of The I.T. Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. Since, These Two Captioned Appeals Relate To The Same Assessee, Same Assessment Year, Therefore, These Have Been Clubbed & Heard Together & A Consolidated Order Is Being Passed For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity. 3. These Two Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of Cit(A) Confirming The Penalty In Respect Of Violation Of Section 271A & 271(1)(B) Of The I.T. Act, 1961. M/S. R.K. Mondal & Brothers

For Appellant: Shri U. Dasgupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G.H. Seema, Addl. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)Section 271ASection 44A

D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, AM: These captioned appeals filed by the assessee, pertaining to Assessment Year 2010-11, are directed against orders passed by the CIT(A)- Durgapur, in Appeal No.146/147/CIT(A)/DGP/2012-13, dated 18.02.2016, which in turn arises out of orders passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 271A & 271(1

M/S R. K. MONDAL & BROTHERS,BURDWAN vs. ITO, WD-1(1), DURGAPUR, DURGAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee (in ITA

ITA 1146/KOL/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Jan 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.1145 & 1146/Kol/2016 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11) M/S. R.K. Mondal & Vs. I.T.O, W-1(1), Durgapur Brothers Aayakar Bithi, City Centre, Vill + P.O: Kajora Gram, Durgapur, Durgapur – 713216. Dist. Burdwan, Pin-713338. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aahfr 6294 C (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant By :Shri U. Dasgupta, Advocate Respondent By :Shri G.H. Seema, Addl. Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 15/01/2018 घोषणाकीतारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 25/01/2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am: These Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2010-11, Are Directed Against Orders Passed By The Cit(A)- Durgapur, In Appeal No.146/147/Cit(A)/Dgp/2012-13, Dated 18.02.2016, Which In Turn Arises Out Of Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer U/S 271A & 271(1)(B) Of The I.T. Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. Since, These Two Captioned Appeals Relate To The Same Assessee, Same Assessment Year, Therefore, These Have Been Clubbed & Heard Together & A Consolidated Order Is Being Passed For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity. 3. These Two Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of Cit(A) Confirming The Penalty In Respect Of Violation Of Section 271A & 271(1)(B) Of The I.T. Act, 1961. M/S. R.K. Mondal & Brothers

For Appellant: Shri U. Dasgupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G.H. Seema, Addl. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)Section 271ASection 44A

D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, AM: These captioned appeals filed by the assessee, pertaining to Assessment Year 2010-11, are directed against orders passed by the CIT(A)- Durgapur, in Appeal No.146/147/CIT(A)/DGP/2012-13, dated 18.02.2016, which in turn arises out of orders passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 271A & 271(1

MADINA RICE MILL PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CEN. CIR. 4(4), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 802/KOL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Sept 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kapil Mondal, DR
Section 133ASection 145(3)Section 148Section 271ASection 273BSection 274

D E R PER BENCH: These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the orders of Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kolkata-27 [learned CIT (A)] even dated 15th February, 2024 for A.Ys. 2013-14 to 2017-18, which are arising from the penalty under 271A of the Act framed by ld. ACIT Central Circle

MADINA RICE MILL PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CEN. CIR. 4(4), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 806/KOL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kapil Mondal, DR
Section 133ASection 145(3)Section 148Section 271ASection 273BSection 274

D E R PER BENCH: These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the orders of Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kolkata-27 [learned CIT (A)] even dated 15th February, 2024 for A.Ys. 2013-14 to 2017-18, which are arising from the penalty under 271A of the Act framed by ld. ACIT Central Circle

MADINA RICE MILL PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIR. 4(4) , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 805/KOL/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Sept 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kapil Mondal, DR
Section 133ASection 145(3)Section 148Section 271ASection 273BSection 274

D E R PER BENCH: These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the orders of Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kolkata-27 [learned CIT (A)] even dated 15th February, 2024 for A.Ys. 2013-14 to 2017-18, which are arising from the penalty under 271A of the Act framed by ld. ACIT Central Circle

MADINA RICE MILL PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(4), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 803/KOL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kapil Mondal, DR
Section 133ASection 145(3)Section 148Section 271ASection 273BSection 274

D E R PER BENCH: These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the orders of Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kolkata-27 [learned CIT (A)] even dated 15th February, 2024 for A.Ys. 2013-14 to 2017-18, which are arising from the penalty under 271A of the Act framed by ld. ACIT Central Circle

MADINA RICE MILL PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR. 4(4), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 804/KOL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Sept 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kapil Mondal, DR
Section 133ASection 145(3)Section 148Section 271ASection 273BSection 274

D E R PER BENCH: These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the orders of Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kolkata-27 [learned CIT (A)] even dated 15th February, 2024 for A.Ys. 2013-14 to 2017-18, which are arising from the penalty under 271A of the Act framed by ld. ACIT Central Circle

SRI SURENDRA KUMAR SHARMA,BURDWAN vs. ITO, WD-1(4), ASANSOL, BURDWAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in part

ITA 497/KOL/2015[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Dec 2017AY 2005-2006

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Hon’Ble & Sri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Hon’Ble]

Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

1(4), Asansol…….……………………………………………....Respondent Sahana Apartment Lower Chelidanga PO: Asansol – 713 304 Dist: Burdwan (WB) Appearances by: Shri V.N. Purohit, FCA, appeared on behalf of the assessee. Shri Arindam Bhattacharya, Addl. CIT, DR appearing on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : December 12th, 2017 Date of pronouncing the order : December 21st, 2017 O R D

SRI SURENDRA KUMAR SHARMA,DURGAPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(4), ASANSOL, ASANSOL

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in part

ITA 206/KOL/2015[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Dec 2017AY 2005-2006

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Hon’Ble & Sri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Hon’Ble]

Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

1(4), Asansol…….……………………………………………....Respondent Sahana Apartment Lower Chelidanga PO: Asansol – 713 304 Dist: Burdwan (WB) Appearances by: Shri V.N. Purohit, FCA, appeared on behalf of the assessee. Shri Arindam Bhattacharya, Addl. CIT, DR appearing on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : December 12th, 2017 Date of pronouncing the order : December 21st, 2017 O R D

SRI SURENDRA KUMAR SHARMA,DURGAPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(4), ASANSOL, ASANSOL

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in part

ITA 207/KOL/2015[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Dec 2017AY 2005-2006

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Hon’Ble & Sri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Hon’Ble]

Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

1(4), Asansol…….……………………………………………....Respondent Sahana Apartment Lower Chelidanga PO: Asansol – 713 304 Dist: Burdwan (WB) Appearances by: Shri V.N. Purohit, FCA, appeared on behalf of the assessee. Shri Arindam Bhattacharya, Addl. CIT, DR appearing on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : December 12th, 2017 Date of pronouncing the order : December 21st, 2017 O R D

ANITA BASAK,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CC 1(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2174/KOL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm Anita Basak Acit, Central Circle 1(1), C/O. S.N. Ghosh & Associates, Kolkata, Advocates, Aaykar Bhawan Poorva, 2, Garstin Place, 2 Nd Floor, Suite 110 Shanti Pally, 5 Th Floor, Vs. No.203, Off Hare Street, Kolkata, Eastern Metropolitian By Pass, West Bengal-700001, Kolkata-700107, West Bengal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Ahhpb5785B Assessee By : Shri Somnath Ghosh, Ar Revenue By : Shri Ruchika Sharma, Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 19.12.2025

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ruchika Sharma, DR
Section 1Section 133Section 143(3)Section 144Section 144ASection 145(3)Section 270ASection 271Section 271ASection 44A

D E R Per Rajesh Kumar, AM: This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the penalty order u/s 271A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) vide order dated 25.03.2022 by Central Circle 1(1), Kolkata for A.Y. 2018-19. 2. The only issue raised by the assessee in various grounds of appeal is against the order