BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 196clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi123Mumbai116Jaipur41Raipur36Bangalore32Chandigarh22Ahmedabad18Hyderabad13Surat7Guwahati5Indore5Lucknow4Pune3Kolkata3Chennai2Cochin2Dehradun1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(2)4Section 1484Section 324Section 143(3)2Section 1472Section 142(1)2Addition to Income2Penalty2

M/S GENERAL POLYTEX PVT. LTD.,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 166/KOL/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A. No. 166/Kol/2022 Assessment Year: 2015-2016 M/S. General Polytex Pvt. Limited,...........Appellant 0/2171-72, Malviniwadi, Sonifalia, Bhagatalav, Gujarat-395003 [Pan: Aaccb5335L] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,...............................Respondent Ward-1(1), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata-700069 Appearances By: Shri M.K. Patwari, Fca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Vijay Kumar, Addl. Cit, Sr. D.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 07, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : March 16, 2023 O R D E R

Section 143(2)Section 271Section 32

196 days. However, this delay is attributable to COVID period and, therefore, it is to be construed that there is no delay in filing the appeal. 3. The assessee has taken five grounds of appeal. However, its grievances revolve around a single issue, namely ld. CIT(Appeals) has erred in confirming the action of the ld. Assessing Officer

UMANG WEBTECH PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 1(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1311/KOL/2024[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Aug 2025AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c ) of the Act is initiated separately for concealment of particulars of income of Rs. 35,00,000/-. In course of assessment proceedings, it was noted that the assessee claimed loss of Rs. 18,26,160/- in the current year. In spite of given number of opportunities as discussed in foregoing para the assessee failed

NAVANSH VINIMAY PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 8(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 724/KOL/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 May 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250

penalty under section 271(1)(c) is also initiated. As discussed in the foregoing paragraphs, the assessee had arranged pre- arranged accommodation entries to the tune of Rs. 63,76,486/- through the entry operators who facilitates such accommodation entry on receipt of commission only. As reported by the Investigation Directorate, the entry operators charge a commission