140 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 147clear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 140 · Page 1 of 7
In the result, the appeal is partly allowed
Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra
147 dated 26 -03-2015 had initiated the penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income whereas the Assessing Officer concluded the impugned Penalty Order U/S 271(1)(c) by imposing the penalty for concealment of income. 3. That the learned CIT (Appeals) has erred in law and on facts in sustaining the penalty levied U/S 271