BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 145Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai41Delhi20Ahmedabad19Chandigarh10Bangalore5Surat4Kolkata3Jaipur3Agra2

Key Topics

Section 271A7Section 145A4Section 1454Section 271(1)4Section 271(1)(c)3Penalty3Addition to Income3Section 2742

DCIT, CENTAL CIRCLE -2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S/ ARYAN MINNING & TRADING CORPORATION LTD, KOLAKTA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1601/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Feb 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. A.T.Varkey & Sh. A.L.Sainidcit, M/S. Aryan Mining & Central Circle-2(2), Aayakar V Trading Corporation Ltd., P-1, Hide Lane, 8Th Floor, Bhawan, Poorva, 110 S Shantipally, Kolkata-700073. Kolkata-700107. Pan-Aadca7247B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. A.K.Singh, Cit Dr Respondent By Sh. A.K.Tulsyan, Fca & Ms. Sikha Agarwal, Aca 27.12.2018 Date Of Hearing 01.02.2019 Date Of Pronouncement

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 271A

145A of the Income-tax Act, which deals with the method of valuation of stock for the purposes of Section 145 of the Act, requires the assessee to follow any of accepted methods of stock valuation on the condition that the method once adopted must be followed consistently. We therefore find that following the consistent method of valuation followed

M/S KHANDELWAL CHEMICALS,KOLKATA vs. THE ITO, WD-35(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1494/KOL/2014[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Apr 2017AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri M. Balaganesh, I.T.A.No. 1494/Kol/2014 Assessment Year: 2007-08

Section 145ASection 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

penalty u/s 271(1)(c ) of the Act on sustenance of the said addition. It was pleaded before the ld AO that the Tax Auditor had reported the deviation, if any, on the value of closing stock as NIL due to the applicability of provisions of section 145A

PRAFUL KUMAR RATILAL SOMAIYA,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 43, KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in part

ITA 2445/KOL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Apr 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy) I.T.A. No. 2445/Kol/2017 Assessment Year: 2011-12

Section 145Section 145ASection 250Section 271(1)(c)

Penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) has been initiated separately in this regard.” 3.1. The ld. CIT(A) rejected the contention of the assessee by holding that Section 145 of the Act, confers sufficient power upon the Assessing Officer to make such computation in such a manner as he determines for deducing the correct profit and gains