BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 12A(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi95Bangalore50Mumbai50Calcutta34Hyderabad31Ahmedabad31Lucknow16Jaipur16Visakhapatnam12Chandigarh11Indore10Pune9Amritsar9Allahabad8Cochin6Patna4Kolkata4Rajkot3Jodhpur2Raipur2Surat2Nagpur2

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)7Section 356Section 2745Section 11(1)(A)3Penalty3Addition to Income3Section 143(2)2Section 2502Section 147

JERMEL'S ACCADEMY,SILIGURI vs. I.T.O., WARD - 1(4), , SILIGURI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed as per the directions mentioned above

ITA 1652/KOL/2024[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Mar 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(A)Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the I.T Act are also initiated for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income in the return.” Page 3 of 13 I.T.A. No.: 1652/KOL/2024 Assessment Year: 2016-17 Jermel's Accademy. 4. The total income was accordingly assessed u/s 143(3)/147 of the Act at Rs. 3,98,75,551/-. Aggrieved with the assessment

2
Section 12A2

SSL EXPORTS LTD., ,HOWRAH vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 3(1), KOLKATA

In the result this ground of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2670/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Oct 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri Aby T. Varkey)

Section 133ASection 250Section 271Section 35

2 I.T.A. No. 2670/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2013-14 SSL Exports Ltd. 3. The AO disallowed the claim made by the assessee u/s 35 of the Act by holding as follows: a) Information was received from the Pr. DIT(Inv.) vide letter dated 09.10.2015 that a survey action u/s 133A was carried on dated 27.01.2015 at the registered/Administrative offices

ADWAITA DAS,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR-34, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal of the assessee is accordingly allowed

ITA 123/KOL/2014[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 May 2017AY 2008-2009
For Appellant: Shri T.K.Chakraborty, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Kumar Kureel, JCIT. Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

Section 271(1)(c) of the Act by furnishing inaccurate particulars of income and imposed penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. The CIT(A) confirmed the order of AO. Hence this appeal by the assessee before the Tribunal. 4. The ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted before us that the show cause notice issued u/s

D.C.I.T CIR - 7,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. P.K.S LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 1934/KOL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Oct 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri P.M Jagtap & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(2)

u/s 271(1)(C) determined on “Handling & Moisture loss” 14. It is observed from the penalty order, that the AO initiated the penalty proceedings by issuing a notice under section 274 of the act on two grounds. One such ground was that as discussed in the afore mentioned paras of appeal in ITA 1935/Kol/2013 wherein we arrived at a conclusion