Search: penalty u/s 271

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 111Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai34 Delhi9 Hyderabad2 Surat2 Chandigarh2 Kolkata2 Ahmedabad1 Bangalore1 Indore1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)7 Section 80P6 Section 80P(2)(a)4 Section 80P(2)(d)4 Section 142(1)4 Section 143(3)2 Section 2632 Section 802

MS. LEELA MONDAL,NORTH 24 PARGANAS vs. I.T.O, WD -50(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 2383/KOL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Jun 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Appellant: ShriH. K. Mridha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.S. Alam, JCIT, Sr. DR

Section 111ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

111A of the Act. No appeal has been preferred against this order by the assessee. Therefore, that addition has become final. Thereafter, the AO has initiated the penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act. The assessee was asked to explain, vide penalty notice dated 29.12.2010 as to why penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the act should

MS. LEELA MONDAL,NORTH 24 PARGANAS vs. I.T.O, WD -50(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

MS. LEELA MONDAL,NORTH 24 PARGANAS vs. I.T.O, WD -50(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

GUNJA SAMABAY KRISHI UNNAYAN SAMITY LTD,PURULIA vs. PCIT,, ASANSOL